LIA vs. LIA + ACB-iPACK Block for Total Knee Arthroplasty

April 24, 2023 updated by: Women's College Hospital

The Ideal Analgesic Technique for Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Comparison Between Local Infiltration Analgesia Alone or Combined With Adductor Canal and iPACK Blocks

LIA is the mainstay of postoperative analgesia in patients having knee arthroplasty. The combination of ACB-iPACK blocks has also been proposed as an effective analgesic modality for total knee arthroplasty. However, whether combining these two modalities yields any important incremental analgesic benefit remains unclear. The investigators hypothesized that the addition of ACB and iPACK blocks to LIA will yield clinically important analgesic benefits compared to LIA alone in patients having total knee arthroplasty.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

LIA is the mainstay of postoperative analgesia in patients having knee arthroplasty. Performed by surgeons, LIA provides effective postoperative pain relief and reduces opioid requirements. Similar analgesic benefits have also been attributed to adductor canal and iPACK blocks, which partially block sensory innervation to the knee and its posterior capsule. Performed by anesthesiologist preoperatively, these blocks have also been incorporated into the care standard in numerous centers. However, it is not clear whether adding the adductor canal and iPACK blocks yields any incremental analgesic benefits. The investigators aimed to evaluate the benefits of adding adductor canal and iPACK blocks to LIA in patients having total knee arthroplasty.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 83 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. ASA classification I-III
  2. BMI < 35 kg/m2
  3. Having elective unilateral total knee arthroplasty

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Bilateral knee surgery.
  2. Pre-existing neurological deficit or peripheral neuropathy in the lower the lower limbs
  3. Severe, poorly controlled cardiac conditions, significant arrhythmias, severe valvular heart diseases
  4. Severe, poorly controlled respiratory conditions (severe COPD, severe interstitial lung disease, severe / poorly controlled asthma)
  5. Contraindication to regional anesthesia (e.g. bleeding diathesis, coagulopathy, sepsis, infection at the site of potential needle puncture on the posterior chest)
  6. Patient refusal
  7. Chronic pain disorder
  8. Chronic opioid use (≥30 mg oxycodone / day)
  9. Contraindication (or allergy) to a component of multi-modal analgesia protocol
  10. Allergy to amide local anesthetics used in nerve blocks
  11. Contraindications to spinal anesthesia
  12. Significant psychiatric disorder that would preclude objective study assessment
  13. Pregnancy
  14. Inability to provide informed consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Local infiltration analgesia
Patients in this group will receive LIA intraoperatively, as per institutional standard. The injected solution will be comprised of 100cc Ropiv 2%, + Ketorolac 30 mg + Epinephrine 25 ug.
Procedure: Local infiltration analgesia performed by surgeons.
Active Comparator: Local infiltration analgesia + ACB-iPACK block

Patients in this group will receive LIA intraoperatively, as per institutional standard. The injected solution will be comprised of 100cc Ropiv 2%, + Ketorolac 30 mg + Epinephrine 25 ug.

Patients in this group will also receive preoperative nerve blocks under ultrasound guidance. These will include:

  1. Adductor canal block with 0.5% Ropivacaine w/epi 20 mL
  2. iPack block with 0.25% Ropivacaine w/epi 10 mL
Procedure: Local infiltration analgesia performed by surgeons.
Procedure: Ultrasound-guided adductor canal and iPACK blocks performed by anesthesiologists preoperatively.
Other Names:
  • iPACK block

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Postoperative pain at rest
Time Frame: over the first 24 hours
Area under the curve
over the first 24 hours
Quality of recovery (QoR-15)
Time Frame: 24 hours postoperatively

Quality of Recovery (QR15) scores at 24 hours will be the second primary outcome.

QR15 is a measurement of quality of recovery after surgery and anesthesia that has been psychometrically tested and validated. Reporting of outcome measures on a scale of 0 to 10 (0=None of the time and 10=All of the time). There are a total of 40 items/questions.

24 hours postoperatively

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean opioid analgesic consumption
Time Frame: 24 hours postoperatively
Postoperative cumulative oral morphine equivalent consumption during the first 24 hours
24 hours postoperatively
Time to first analgesic request
Time Frame: Up to 48 hours following surgery
Up to 48 hours following surgery
Pain Assessment (VAS)
Time Frame: at 0, 6, 12, 18 and 24 hours
Visual Analogue Scale(VAS) - Pain:Overall pain assessed at rest and on movement A continuous scale comprised of a 100mm (10cm) horizontal line, anchored by 2 verbal descriptions No Pain to Worst Pain
at 0, 6, 12, 18 and 24 hours
Risk of opioid-related side effects
Time Frame: Up until one month following nerve block
nausea, vomiting, pruritus, sedation
Up until one month following nerve block
Block-related complications
Time Frame: Up until one month following nerve block
vascular puncture, hematoma formation, intravascular injection, epidural anesthesia-bilateral sensory block
Up until one month following nerve block
Satisfaction with pain management
Time Frame: at 24 hours
A Patient Diary will be completed to assess overall satisfaction with analgesic technique 10 cm scale with "not satisfied at all" and "very satisfied" at either end
at 24 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

April 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2024

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 8, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 18, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

March 22, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 26, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 24, 2023

Last Verified

April 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • LIA vs. LIA + ACB-iPACK block

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Neuromuscular Blockade

Clinical Trials on Local infiltration analgesia

3
Subscribe