Extracorporeal CO2 Removal in Acute Exacerbation of COPD Not Responding to Non-Invasive Ventilation

May 8, 2021 updated by: SILVA, Centre Hospitalier de Saint-Denis

Extracorporeal CO2 Removal in Acute Exacerbation of COPD Not Responding to Non-Invasive Ventilation: a Single Center Experience

Background: Acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (ae-COPD) has a gold standard treatment: non-invasive ventilation (NIV). However, this treatment sometime fails, and an invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) is required. The extracorporeal CO₂ removal (ECCO₂R) device can be an alternative to intubation. The aim of the study is to evaluate ECCO₂R efficiency and safety and enlighten ECCO₂R benefit/risk compared to IMV.

Methods: Successive ae-COPD patients for whom NIV failed were retrospectively analyzed during two periods: before and after the ECCO₂R device implementation in our ICU in 2015. We considered the before period as standard of care and patients were treated with IMV. The ECCO₂R device was a pump-driven veno-venous system (Xenios AG).

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

The study compare 2 strategies for COPD patients not responding to non invasive ventilation: the gold standard which is mechanical ventilation and a new technique which is extracorporeal CO2 removal. This technique have been implemented in februrary 2015 in our intensive care unit so we choose to compare patients' outcome before and after the arriving of this device.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

56

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Successive ae-COPD patients for whom non-invasive ventilation failed during two periods: before and after the ECCO2R device implementation in our ICU in 2015.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • age > 18 years old
  • no improvement or worsening of respiratory acidosis after more than one hour of non invasive ventilation treatment
  • and non improvement of respiratory distress signs
  • and pH < 7,35 and PaCO2 > 45 mmHg

Exclusion Criteria:

  • patients not eligible for endotracheal intubation because of ethical limitations

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Need for invasive mechanical ventilation despite ECCO2R technique
Time Frame: From the begining of the ECCO2R treatment until the end of the ICU hospitalization, up to 6months
Rate of patients who needed invasive mechanical ventilation despite ECCO2R technique
From the begining of the ECCO2R treatment until the end of the ICU hospitalization, up to 6months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
ECCO2R efficiency
Time Frame: During the treatment up to 6months
pH
During the treatment up to 6months
ECCO2R efficiency
Time Frame: During the treatment up to 6months
PaCO2
During the treatment up to 6months
Adverse Effects related to ECCO2R and invasive mechanical ventilation during the ICU hospitalization
Time Frame: During the ICU hospitalization up to 6months
Rate of complications related to ECCO2R and invasive mechanical ventilation: hemorrhagic, thrombotic, haemodynamic, ventilator associated pneumonia, self extubation, death
During the ICU hospitalization up to 6months
ICU and hospital length of stay
Time Frame: From the entrance in ICU until the end of hospitalization in ICU and hospital up to 6months
Length of stay in ICU and hospital
From the entrance in ICU until the end of hospitalization in ICU and hospital up to 6months
Mortality at day 28 and day 90
Time Frame: From the entrance in ICU until day 90
Mortality at day 28 and day 90
From the entrance in ICU until day 90

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 2, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 8, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

May 12, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 12, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 8, 2021

Last Verified

May 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on COPD Exacerbation Acute

3
Subscribe