Dyadic Yoga Intervention for the Improvement of Healthcare Utilization and Quality of Life in Patients With Head and Neck Cancer Undergoing Chemoradiation and Their Caregivers

December 12, 2023 updated by: M.D. Anderson Cancer Center

Improving Healthcare Utilization and Quality of Life in Head and Neck Cancer Patients Undergoing Chemoradiation and Their Family Caregivers

This study evaluates if partner-based (dyadic) yoga programs may improve the quality of life of patients with head and neck cancer undergoing chemoradiation and their caregivers, and if it is a cost-effective option. Yoga programs may decrease how often patients come to the hospital during and after treatment with chemoradiation, and improve the quality of life for both patients and caregivers.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:

I. Examine the efficacy of the dyadic yoga (DY) intervention regarding reduced patient emergency department (ED) visits and feeding tube (FT) insertions and improved patient and caregiver quality of life (QOL) as compared to the usual care (UC) group.

II. Estimate intervention costs, direct medical costs, indirect costs (i.e., productivity loss), and evaluate the overall cost-effectiveness of the DY intervention for patients and caregivers.

III. Demonstrate that, compared to the UC group, the DY program improves patient and caregiver symptoms burden, objective physical function, and illness communication and reduces patient use of opioids during chemoradiotherapy (CRT), which will in turn mediate intervention outcomes at the follow-up assessments.

IV. Understand the patient and caregiver experience of head and neck cancer (HNC), healthcare utilization and symptom management and emerging themes as possible mediators as they relate to or suggest modifications of our proposed model using qualitative methods.

OUTLINE: Participants are randomized to 1 of 2 arms.

ARM I: Patients and caregivers receive standard care including education pertaining to symptom management, prophylactic dental hygiene and possible extraction, speech pathology for baseline swallowing assessment and prophylactic treatment, and dietary services for regular nutrition consults during CRT. Psychiatry, social work, interventional radiology and supportive care services are consulted as needed.

ARM II: Patients and caregivers receive standard care as in arm I. Patients and caregivers also participate in yoga sessions 3 times per week over 60 minutes each for a total of 15 sessions.

After completion of study, participants are followed up every 2 weeks for 3 months and then monthly for up to 6 months.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

400

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
        • Recruiting
        • M D Anderson Cancer Center
        • Contact:
          • Kathrin Milbury
          • Phone Number: 713-745-2868
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Kathrin Milbury

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • PATIENTS: Diagnosed with a primary HNC and going to receive at least 5 weeks (25 fractions) of CRT
  • PATIENTS: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of =< 2
  • PATIENTS: Having a family caregiver (e.g., spouse/partner, sibling, adult child) willing to participate
  • PATIENTS AND CAREGIVERS: Must be at least 18 years old
  • PATIENTS AND CAREGIVERS: Able to read and speak English
  • PATIENTS AND CAREGIVERS: Able to provide informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • PATIENTS AND CAREGIVERS: Who have regularly (self-defined) participated in a yoga program in the year prior to diagnosis

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Arm I (Standard of care)
Patients and caregivers receive standard care including education pertaining to symptom management, prophylactic dental hygiene and possible extraction, speech pathology for baseline swallowing assessment and prophylactic treatment, and dietary services for regular nutrition consults during CRT. Psychiatry, social work, interventional radiology and supportive care services are consulted as needed.
Ancillary studies
Receive standard care
Other Names:
  • standard of care
  • standard therapy
Other: Arm II (exercise, yoga sessions)
Patients and caregivers receive standard care as in arm I. Patients and caregivers also participate in yoga sessions 3 times per week over 60 minutes each for a total of 15 sessions.
Ancillary studies
Receive standard care
Other Names:
  • standard of care
  • standard therapy
Participate in yoga sessions

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient healthcare utilization (Standard of care)
Time Frame: Up to 6 months with 3 months follow-up
Will examine group differences in patient emergency department visit (yes/no) during the observation period of during and up to 3 months post chemoradiotherapy (CRT) as the primary outcome. Will use logistic regression with the randomization factors as covariates, as these factors may be associated with the study outcomes, and controlling for them is likely to increase the power to detect the between-group differences.
Up to 6 months with 3 months follow-up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Caregiver quality of life questionnaire (RAND 36-Item Health Survey)
Time Frame: Up to 6 months with 3 months follow-up

Will examine group differences over the 6-month follow-up period specifying the T4 as the primary endpoint using a dyadic model (assuming additional dependence in outcomes between patient and caregiver outcomes). This analysis will be imbedded in a linear mixed-effects (alternatively known as the multilevel) model analysis, with repeated measures over time (i.e., at end of CRT, 1-, 3- and 6-month follow-ups). In the mixed models, group will be entered as a primary variable of interest and baseline level of the outcome will be treated as a covariate.

Participants Energy/Fatigue level-(0-lowest energy level/ 100-highest energy no fatigue)

Up to 6 months with 3 months follow-up
Patient quality of life questionnaire
Time Frame: Up to 6 months with 3 months follow-up

Will examine group differences over the 6-month follow-up period specifying the T4 as the primary endpoint using a dyadic model (assuming additional dependence in outcomes between patient and caregiver outcomes). This analysis will be imbedded in a linear mixed-effects (alternatively known as the multilevel) model analysis, with repeated measures over time (i.e., at end of CRT, 1-, 3- and 6-month follow-ups). In the mixed models, group will be entered as a primary variable of interest and baseline level of the outcome will be treated as a covariate.

Participants Energy/Fatigue level-(0-lowest energy level/ 100-highest energy no fatigue)

Up to 6 months with 3 months follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Kathrin Milbury, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 28, 2021

Primary Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 27, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 12, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

May 18, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

December 13, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 12, 2023

Last Verified

December 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2020-0311 (Other Identifier: M D Anderson Cancer Center)
  • NCI-2020-13884 (Registry Identifier: CTRP (Clinical Trial Reporting Program))
  • R01CA247307 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Head and Neck Carcinoma

Clinical Trials on Questionnaire Administration

3
Subscribe