rTMS and Multi-Modality Aphasia Therapy for Post-Stroke Aphasia (TMAT)

September 11, 2023 updated by: Dr. Sean Dukelow, University of Calgary

A Randomized Pilot Trial of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) and Multi-Modality Aphasia Treatment (M-MAT) for Post-Stroke Non-Fluent Aphasia

Many stroke survivors experience aphasia, a loss or impairment of language affecting the production or understanding of speech. One common type of aphasia is known as non-fluent aphasia. Patients with non-fluent aphasia have difficulty formulating grammatical sentences, often producing short word fragments despite having a good understanding of what others are trying to communicate to them. Speech language pathologists (SLPs) play a central role rehabilitating persons with aphasia and administer therapy in an attempt to improve communication skills. Despite standard therapy, approximately 50% of individuals who experience aphasia acutely continue to have language deficits more than 6 months post-stroke.

In most people, Broca's area is dominant in the left side of the brain. Following a left-sided stroke, the right-sided homologue of Broca's area (the pars triangularis), may adopt language function. Unfortunately, reorganizing language to the right side of the brain seems to be less effective than restoring function to the left hemisphere. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), a form of non-invasive brain stimulation, can be used to suppress activity of specific regions in the right side of the brain to promote recovery of function in the perilesional area. Despite preliminary success in existing studies using rTMS in post-stroke aphasia, there is much work to be done to better understand the mechanisms underlying recovery. Responses to rTMS have been positive, yet heterogenous, which may be related to timing of treatments following stroke.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

20

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Alberta
      • Calgary, Alberta, Canada, T2N 2T9
        • Foothills Medical Centre

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Isolated left middle cerebral artery (MCA) stroke more than 6 months ago (chronic)
  • Stroke type: Ischemic or hemorrhagic
  • Non-fluent aphasia as determined by the Western Aphasia Battery (Fluency < 5)
  • Right-hand dominant prior to stroke
  • English is first or primary language
  • Ability to follow 3-step commands

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prior stroke to the right frontal lobe
  • Current diagnosis of moderate to severe depression
  • Diagnosis of any other psychiatric condition
  • History of other neurologic disorders (e.g., epilepsy, brain tumor)
  • Contraindication to MRI or TMS (metal in the head or any implanted electrical device)
  • Has received intensive speech therapy within the past 6 months (>8 hours per week)
  • Enrolled in another interventional study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Multi-modality aphasia therapy plus 1Hz rTMS
Chronic stroke patients, receive 10 days of 3.5hrs of multi-modality aphasia therapy (M-MAT) preceded by 20 minutes of 1Hz rTMS delivered at 100% of resting motor threshold over the right pars triangularis.
20 minutes of 1Hz (1200 pulses) repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) applied by Magstim Rapid 2 stimulator equipped with an airfilm figure-8 coil
Participants receive 3.5 hours of intensive speech therapy in small groups delivered by a blinded speech language pathologist and therapy assistant. The objective of M-MAT is to improve word production through shaping of responses (ie. Gradually increasing complexity of spoken targets towards eventual mastery) and social-mediated repetitive practice. Therapists use game-based interactive tasks and rich multi-modal cueing (gestures, written words, drawing, reading words) to improve spoken production and oral communication.
Sham Comparator: Multi-modality aphasia therapy plus sham rTMS
Chronic stroke patients, receive 10 days of 3.5hrs of multi-modality aphasia therapy (M-MAT) preceded by 20 minutes of sham rTMS is achieved using a sham TMS coil which attenuates the magnetic output of the stimulator by 80%.
Participants receive 3.5 hours of intensive speech therapy in small groups delivered by a blinded speech language pathologist and therapy assistant. The objective of M-MAT is to improve word production through shaping of responses (ie. Gradually increasing complexity of spoken targets towards eventual mastery) and social-mediated repetitive practice. Therapists use game-based interactive tasks and rich multi-modal cueing (gestures, written words, drawing, reading words) to improve spoken production and oral communication.
20 minutes of 1Hz (1200 pulses) repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) applied by Magstim Rapid 2 stimulator equipped with an airfilm figure-8 sham coil.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from baseline on the Boston Naming Test within one week of intervention completion
Time Frame: Baseline, within 1 week of completing the 10 day intervention
Number of spontaneously produced correct responses to a series of line drawings. That is, the number of correctly named images.
Baseline, within 1 week of completing the 10 day intervention
Change from baseline on the Boston Naming Test at 3 months
Time Frame: Baseline and 3-month follow-up
Number of spontaneously produced correct responses to a series of line drawings. That is, the number of correctly named images.
Baseline and 3-month follow-up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Trained and Untrained Picture Naming
Time Frame: Baseline, within 1 week of completing the 10 day intervention and 3-month follow-up
Number of correctly named pictures from a set of trained nouns, trained verbs, untrained nouns, and untrained verbs
Baseline, within 1 week of completing the 10 day intervention and 3-month follow-up
Story Narrative Task
Time Frame: Baseline, within 1 week of completing the 10 day intervention and 3-month follow-up
Retelling of the Cinderella task as a measure of discourse, performance is quantified by number of correct information units.
Baseline, within 1 week of completing the 10 day intervention and 3-month follow-up
Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9)
Time Frame: Baseline, within 1 week of completing the 10 day intervention and 3-month follow-up
A 9-item questionnaire completed by a caregiver to quickly assess depressive symptoms. The scale ranges from 0 to 27 with higher scores indicating greater endorsement of depressive symptoms.
Baseline, within 1 week of completing the 10 day intervention and 3-month follow-up
EuroQoL-5D-5L
Time Frame: Baseline, within 1 week of completing the 10 day intervention and 3-month follow-up
Assesses mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. The answers given can be converted into EQ-5D index with scores anchored at 0 for death and 1 for perfect health. The EQ-5D also records the patient's self-rated health on a vertical visual analogue scale ranging from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating higher self-perceived quality of life. This can be used as a quantitative measure of health outcome that reflects the patient's own judgement.
Baseline, within 1 week of completing the 10 day intervention and 3-month follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 1, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 31, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

January 31, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 20, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 20, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

May 25, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 13, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 11, 2023

Last Verified

September 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

No plan to make IPD available to other researchers

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stroke

Clinical Trials on 1Hz inhibitory rTMS

3
Subscribe