Segmentectomy Versus Lobectomy for Lung Adenocarcinoma ≤ 2cm

July 25, 2023 updated by: Deping Zhao, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Shanghai, China

Comparison of Segmentectomy Versus Lobectomy for Lung Adenocarcinoma ≤ 2cm With Micropapillary and Solid Subtype Negative by Intraoperative Frozen Sections: A Prospective and Multi-center Randomized Controlled Trial Study

This study aims to evaluate the non-inferiority in recurrence-free survival and overall survival of segmentectomy compared with lobectomy in patients with lung adenocarcinoma ≤ 2 cm with micropapillary and solid subtype negative by intraoperative frozen sections.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

At present, the technology of intraoperative frozen section has gradually matured, which can diagnose the benign and malignant tumors and guide the resection strategy for peripheral small-sized lung adenocarcinoma. Travis et al. reported high specificity of intraoperative frozen section in the identification of micropapillary components, confirming that intraoperative frozen section may guide the selection of surgical procedures. However, there is still little evidence weather segmentectomy is appropriate for invasive adenocarcinoma without micropapillary patterns. This prospective and multi-center study was aimed to evaluate the non-inferiority in recurrence free survival and overall survival of segmentectomy compared with lobectomy in patients with lung adenocarcinoma (≤ 2 cm) not including micropapillary components.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

690

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Anhui
      • Hefei, Anhui, China
        • Recruiting
        • Anhui Chest Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Ning Xu
      • Hefei, Anhui, China
        • Recruiting
        • The First Affiliated Hospital of University of Science and Technology of China
        • Contact:
          • Mingran Xie
    • Henan
      • Nanyang, Henan, China
        • Recruiting
        • Nanyang Central Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Xinwei Dong
    • Jiangsu
      • Nantong, Jiangsu, China, 226001
        • Recruiting
        • Affiliated Hospital Of Nantong University
        • Contact:
          • Honggang Ke
      • Nantong, Jiangsu, China, 216002
        • Recruiting
        • The Sixth People's Hospital of Nantong
        • Contact:
          • Xuedong Zhang
      • Xuzhou, Jiangsu, China
        • Recruiting
        • Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University
        • Contact:
          • Hao Xu
      • Yancheng, Jiangsu, China
        • Recruiting
        • Yancheng First People's Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Jian Sun
    • Shandong
      • Jinan, Shandong, China
        • Recruiting
        • Shandong Public Health Clinical Center
        • Contact:
          • Feng Jin
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Yunzeng Zhang
    • Shanghai
      • Shanghai, Shanghai, China, 200433
        • Recruiting
        • Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital
        • Contact:
      • Shanghai, Shanghai, China
        • Recruiting
        • Huadong Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Xiaoyong Shen
    • Zhejiang
      • Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China, 310009
        • Recruiting
        • The Second Affiliated Hospital Zhejiang University School of Medicine
        • Contact:
          • Junqiang Fan
      • Huzhou, Zhejiang, China
        • Recruiting
        • Huzhou Central Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Qibin Shen
      • Ningbo, Zhejiang, China
        • Recruiting
        • Ningbo First Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Xinjian Li
      • Ningbo, Zhejiang, China
        • Recruiting
        • Ningbo No.2 Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Guofang Zhao

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 79 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient aged 20-79 years old, both male or female;
  • Tumor size <= 2cm on preoperative CT scan;
  • Peripheral solitary nodule or the associated lesion is MIA or less invasive lesion;
  • Preoperative CT indicated that the nodules were non-pure glass nodules (consolidation to tumor ratio >= 0.25);
  • Intraoperative frozen section confirmed invasive lung adenocarcinoma with micropapillary and solid subtype negative (<= 5%);
  • Intraoperative frozen section indicated the resection margins was free of tumor cells;
  • Lung function could withstand both lung segmentectomy and lobectomy (FEV1 > 1.5L or FEV1% >= 60%);
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group, 0 to 2;
  • Volunteer to participate the trial and sign the informed consent, able to comply with the follow-up plan and other program requirements.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Radiological pure ground glass nodules (consolidation to tumor ratio < 0.25);
  • The nodule is close to the lung hilus and is unable to perform segmentectomy;
  • Intraoperative frozen section confirmed with micropapillary and solid subtype positive (> 5%);
  • Intraoperative frozen section confirmed adenocarcinoma in situ and minimally invasive adenocarcinoma;
  • Preoperative imaging examination or EBUS indicated lymph node positive metastasis;
  • Preoperative imaging examination revealed distant metastasis;
  • Patients with severe damage to heart, liver and kidney function (grade 3 ~ 4, ALT and/or AST over 3 times the normal upper limit, Cr over the normal upper limit);
  • Patients with other malignant tumors;
  • Pregnant, planned pregnancy and lactating female patients (urine HCG>2500IU/L is diagnosed as early pregnancy);
  • Prior chemotherapy, radiation therapy or any other therapies were performed; 12 participated in other tumors within three months of relevant clinical subjects;
  • Those who have participated in other tumor-related clinical trials within three months;
  • Those are not suitable for participating in trials according to investigator's assessment.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Segmentectomy with systemic lymph node dissection
Segmentectomy with hilar and mediastinal lymph node dissection is performed. If the tumor located at inter-segment plane and without sufficient resection margin distance, a combined segmentectomy will be performed after a comprehensive evaluation. As with lobectomy, systemic or selective lymph node dissection is mandatory, and nodal sampling is not allowed. At least three stations of mediastinal lymph node from 2R, 4R, 7, 8, 9 for the right side and 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 for the left side, respectively. The distance from the dissection margin to the tumor edge must be evaluated in the same manner as with lobectomy. When lymph node metastasis is present or resection margin is not cancer-free, the surgical procedure must be converted to a lobectomy.
Segmentectomy with hilar and mediastinal lymph node dissection is performed. If the tumor located at inter-segment plane and without sufficient resection margin distance, a combined segmentectomy will be performed. Systemic or selective lymph node dissection is mandatory, and nodal sampling is not allowed. At least three stations of mediastinal lymph node from 2R, 4R, 7, 8, 9 for the right side and 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 for the left side, respectively. The distance from the dissection margin to the tumor edge must be evaluated intra-operatively. If the distance is either less than the maximum tumor diameter or 20 mm, the absence of cancer cells in the resection margin must be histologically or cytologically confirmed before finishing surgery.
Active Comparator: Lobectomy with systemic lymph node dissection

lobectomy with hilar and mediastinal lymph node dissection is performed. Systemic or selective lymph node dissection is mandatory, and nodal sampling is not allowed. At least three stations of mediastinal lymph node from 2R, 4R, 7, 8, 9 for the right side and 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 for the left side, respectively.

The distance from the dissection margin to the tumor edge must be evaluated intraoperatively. If the distance is either less than the maximum tumor diameter or ,20 mm, the absence of cancer cells in the resection margin must be histologically or cytologically confirmed before finishing surgery.

Lobectomy with hilar and mediastinal lymph node dissection is performed. Segmentectomy with hilar and mediastinal lymph node dissection is performed. Systemic or selective lymph node dissection is mandatory, and nodal sampling is not allowed. At least three stations of mediastinal lymph node from 2R, 4R, 7, 8, 9 for the right side and 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 for the left side, respectively. The distance from the dissection margin to the tumor edge must be evaluated intra-operatively. If the distance is either less than the maximum tumor diameter or 20 mm, the absence of cancer cells in the resection margin must be histologically or cytologically confirmed before finishing surgery.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
recurrence-free survival rate
Time Frame: 5 year
Recurrence-free survival (RFS) was defined as the time from surgery until recurrence or death from any cause
5 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
overall survival
Time Frame: 5 year
Overall survival (OS) was defined as the time from surgery until death from any cause
5 year
Operation time
Time Frame: 24 hours
The surgery time in both groups.
24 hours
Blood loss
Time Frame: 24 hours
Intraoperative blood loss in total.
24 hours
Incidence of operative complications
Time Frame: 1 month
Any intraoperative complications related to the surgery.
1 month
Post-operative respiratory function
Time Frame: 6 months
The post-operative respiratory function will be evaluated by FEV1% and FVC.
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Chang Chen, MD, PhD, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 30, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 30, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 24, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 21, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

June 24, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 27, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 25, 2023

Last Verified

July 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Lung Adenocarcinoma

Clinical Trials on Segmentectomy with systemic lymph node dissection

3
Subscribe