Erector Spinae Plane Block Impact on Quality of Recovery After Lumbar Spinal Decompression (ESPB)

January 6, 2022 updated by: Fatma Ahmed Abdel Fatah, Benha University

Erector Spinae Plane Block Impact on Quality of Recovery After Lumbar Spinal Decompression Surgery; a Comparative Study Between Addicts and Non-addicts

Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) as a new trunk fascia block technique was proposed in 2016. ESPB has aroused the interest of many nerve block experts. The benefits of ESPB are not yet demonstrated. The specific mechanism is still controversial. Some believe that ESPB can block the posterior root of the spinal nerve and produce part of the para-spinal block effect with the diffusion of the drug solution.

The present study will carried out to compare the performance of the erector spinae plane block combined with general anesthesia in addicts versus non addicts' patients regarding the local analgesic effect, recovery after surgery and side effects.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Elqalyoubea
      • Banha, Elqalyoubea, Egypt, 13511
        • Banha Faculity of Medicine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 60 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Male

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Male gender.
  2. Age range of 18-60 years.
  3. Scheduled for open lumbar decompression surgery.
  4. A minimum of 1-year experience of drug consumption or having drug withdrawal symptoms when stopping for inclusion in the drug addicts group(according to the patient's statement and rapid opiate urine test).

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Hepatic or renal insufficiency.
  2. Preoperative cognitive dysfunction or communication disorder.
  3. Allergy to amide-type local anaesthetics.
  4. Back puncture site infection.
  5. Coagulation disorders.
  6. Emergency surgery.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Group (A)
History of addiction.
Patients will be placed in left lateral position. A low-frequency curved array ultrasound transducer will be used. The ultrasound transducer will be placed in a longitudinal orientation 2-3 cm lateral to the midline to identify the hyperechoic line of the transverse process. After identification of muscles superficial to the transverse process and local infiltration of anesthesia into the superficial tissues, a block needle will be inserted in a craniocaudal direction until contact will be achieved with the transverse process where the tip will lay in the interfascial plane below the erector spinae muscle. A small bolus of local anaesthetic should be given through the block needle; the erector spinae muscle should be visualized, separating from the transverse process. A total of 20 mL bupivacaine 0.25% will be injected into the interfacial plane deep to the erector spinae muscle bilaterally. Forty minutes after the ESPB, the cutaneous sensory block will be assessed.
Placebo Comparator: Group (N)
No history of addiction to any drug.
Patients will be placed in left lateral position. A low-frequency curved array ultrasound transducer will be used. The ultrasound transducer will be placed in a longitudinal orientation 2-3 cm lateral to the midline to identify the hyperechoic line of the transverse process. After identification of muscles superficial to the transverse process and local infiltration of anesthesia into the superficial tissues, a block needle will be inserted in a craniocaudal direction until contact will be achieved with the transverse process where the tip will lay in the interfascial plane below the erector spinae muscle. A small bolus of local anaesthetic should be given through the block needle; the erector spinae muscle should be visualized, separating from the transverse process. A total of 20 mL bupivacaine 0.25% will be injected into the interfacial plane deep to the erector spinae muscle bilaterally. Forty minutes after the ESPB, the cutaneous sensory block will be assessed.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The quality of recovery score (QoR-15) at 24th hour
Time Frame: at 24th hour
This questionnaire covers a total of 15 questions under five clinical dimensions of health; physical comfort (five-item), emotional status (four-item), psychological support (two-item), physical independence (two-item) and pain (two-item). a numerical rating scale of 11 point for each question leads to a minimum score of 0 (very poor recovery) and a maximum score of 150 (excellent recovery).
at 24th hour

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Postoperative pain.
Time Frame: At half an hour, 2, 4, 8, 12, 24 hours.

Postoperative pain assessed by VAS which scales from zero (no pain) to ten (unbearable pain).

.

At half an hour, 2, 4, 8, 12, 24 hours.
Intraoperative fentanyl dosage.
Time Frame: From the start of operation till its end up to 3 hours.
Intraoperative fentanyl dosage (μg)
From the start of operation till its end up to 3 hours.
First-time morphine use.
Time Frame: In 24 hours
First-time morphine use(in hours).
In 24 hours
First time to ambulation after surgery.
Time Frame: In 24 hours
First time to ambulation after surgery(in hours).
In 24 hours
Length of hospital stay.
Time Frame: up to 3 days.
It is the time of postoperative patient's stay in hospital till discharge.
up to 3 days.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

December 15, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 8, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 24, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

June 29, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 11, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 6, 2022

Last Verified

June 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Postoperative Pain

Clinical Trials on Bupivacain

3
Subscribe