- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04948580
Preventing Violence by Teachers Against Children in Sub-Saharan Africa (EVIDENCE)
Reducing Violence by Teachers Against Children: A Multi-Site Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial of Interaction Competencies With Children - for Teachers (ICC-T) in Primary and Secondary Schools in Tanzania, Uganda and Ghana
Violence has severe and long-lasting negative consequences for children's and adolescents' well-being and psychosocial functioning, thereby also hampering communities' and societies' economic growth. Studies show high prevalence of violence by teachers against children in Sub-Saharan Africa, both in countries where violence is lawful as disciplinary measure at school and in countries where it has been officially banned. In addition to legal and structural factors (e. g. stressful working conditions for teachers), attitudes favoring violence against children as an effective and acceptable discipline method and the lack of access to alternative non-violent strategies are likely to contribute to teachers' ongoing use of violence against children.
Notwithstanding, there are currently very few school-level interventions to reduce violence by teachers that a) have been scientifically evaluated and b) that focus both on changing attitudes towards violence and on equipping teachers with non-violent discipline strategies.
Thus, the present study tests the effectiveness of the preventative intervention Interaction Competencies with Children - for Teachers (ICC-T) in primary and secondary schools in Tanzania, Uganda and Ghana. Previous studies have provided initial evidence on the feasibility and effectiveness of ICC-T to reduce teacher violence in primary and secondary schools in Tanzania and secondary schools in Uganda. This study aims to provide further evidence for the effectiveness of ICC-T to reduce violence and to improve children's functioning (i.e. mental health, well-being, academic performance) across educational settings, societies and cultures.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
The study is a multi-site cluster randomized controlled trial with schools (clusters) as level of randomization. Multi-stage random sampling will be applied to select three zones per country (Tanzania, Uganda and Ghana) and one district in each zone. In each district, eight public schools will be randomly selected, resulting in a total number of 72 schools (24 per country). Schools will be stratified based on school type (primary or secondary school) and location (rural or urban), leading to 36 sites or cluster pairs (3 countries x 3 zones x 2 school types x 2 locations). In each site, one school will be randomly allocated to the intervention group (that will receive the ICC-T intervention) and one school to the control group (that will receive no intervention).
At each school, 40 students (stratified by gender) in the third year of primary school or in the first year of secondary/junior high school and all teachers (expected average number: 20) will be recruited. Thus the final sample will comprise 2880 students and at least 1440 teachers.
The study will have three data assessment points: baseline assessment prior to the intervention, the first follow-up assessment six months after the intervention and the second follow-up assessment 18 months after the intervention. In addition, feasibility data will be assessed in the intervention group at the beginning and the end of the intervention.
Primary outcome measures are student- and teacher-reported physical and emotional violence by teachers in the past week. Secondary outcome measures include teachers' attitudes towards violence against students, children's emotional and behavioral problems, quality of life, and cognitive functioning.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Tobias Hecker, Prof. Dr.
- Phone Number: +49 521 106 3105
- Email: tobias.hecker@uni-bielefeld.de
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Florian Scharpf, Dr.
- Email: florian.scharpf@uni-bielefeld.de
Study Locations
-
-
-
Abetifi, Ghana
- Recruiting
- Presbyterian University College Ghana
-
Contact:
- Amoah Karikari
-
-
-
-
-
Daressalam, Tanzania
- Not yet recruiting
- Daressalaam University College of Education
-
Contact:
- Mabula Nkuba, Dr.
-
-
-
-
-
Mbarara, Uganda
- Recruiting
- Mbarara University of Science and Technology
-
Contact:
- Joseph Ssenyonga, Dr.
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
General:
Inclusion Criteria:
- All: Written informed consent (if underaged by parents (written) & minors themselves (oral or written)
- Students: Enrollment in class 3 of primary school or in class 1 of secondary school
- Teachers: All teachers employed at the school
Schools:
- Public schools
- Mixed-gender schools
- Day schools
- At least 40 students in selected class/stream
Exclusion criteria:
- Acute drug or alcohol intoxication
- Acute psychotic disorder
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
No Intervention: Monitoring condition
No intervention
|
|
Experimental: ICC-T
5.5 days with 8 hours of training for teachers aiming at changing attitudes towards violence and equipping teachers with non-violent discipline strategies
|
Core training components include teacher-student interaction, maltreatment prevention, effective discipline strategies, identifying and supporting burdened students and implementation of the training materials into the school setting
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Change of students' exposure to emotional and physical violence by teachers
Time Frame: The CTS will be used at T1 (baseline, prior to intervention), T2 (first follow-up, 6 months after intervention) and T3 (second follow-up, 18 months after intervention).
|
The Conflict Tactics Scale (CTS) will be used to assess students' self-reported experiences of emotional and physical violence by teachers at school in the past week.
Higher scores indicate higher levels of violence that is used by teachers.
A change of exposure to violence in the intervention group is hypothesized.
|
The CTS will be used at T1 (baseline, prior to intervention), T2 (first follow-up, 6 months after intervention) and T3 (second follow-up, 18 months after intervention).
|
Change of teachers' use of emotional and physical violence
Time Frame: The CTS will be used at T1 (baseline, prior to intervention), T2 (first follow-up, 6 months after intervention) and T3 (second follow-up, 18 months after intervention)
|
The Conflict Tactics Scale (CTS) will be used to assess teachers' use of emotional and physical violent discipline measures against students in the past week.
Higher scores indicate higher levels of violence that is used by teachers.
A change in the use of violence in the intervention group is hypothesized.
|
The CTS will be used at T1 (baseline, prior to intervention), T2 (first follow-up, 6 months after intervention) and T3 (second follow-up, 18 months after intervention)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Change of teachers' positive attitudes towards emotional and physical violence
Time Frame: The adapted version of CTS will be used at T 1 (baseline, prior to intervention), T2 (first follow-up, 6 months after intervention) and T3 (second follow-up, 18 months after the intervention).)
|
Teacher's attitudes towards emotional and physical violence will be assessed with an adapted version of the Conflict Tactic Scale (CTS).
Higher scores indicate higher levels of positive attitudes towards violence.
A change of positive attitudes towards violence in the intervention group is hypothesized.
|
The adapted version of CTS will be used at T 1 (baseline, prior to intervention), T2 (first follow-up, 6 months after intervention) and T3 (second follow-up, 18 months after the intervention).)
|
Change of student's mental health
Time Frame: The PSC-Y will be used at T1 (baseline, prior to intervention), T2 (first follow-up, 6 months after intervention) and T3 (second follow-up, 18 months after intervention)
|
The Pediatric Symptom Checklist - Youth Report (PSC-Y) will assess students' emotional and behavioral problems.
Higher scores indicate higher levels of students' mental health problems.
A change of mental health problems in the intervention group hypothesized.
|
The PSC-Y will be used at T1 (baseline, prior to intervention), T2 (first follow-up, 6 months after intervention) and T3 (second follow-up, 18 months after intervention)
|
Change of students' quality of life
Time Frame: The KIDSCREEN-10 will be used at T1 (baseline, prior to intervention), T2 (first follow-up, 6 months after intervention) and T3 (second follow-up, 18 months after intervention) ]
|
The KIDSCREEN-10 will assess students' quality of life.
Higher scores indicate higher levels of students' quality of life.
A change of quality of life in the intervention group is hypothesized.
|
The KIDSCREEN-10 will be used at T1 (baseline, prior to intervention), T2 (first follow-up, 6 months after intervention) and T3 (second follow-up, 18 months after intervention) ]
|
Change of students' cognitive functioning
Time Frame: The Psych Lab 101 application will be used at T1 (baseline, prior to intervention), T2 (first follow-up, 6 months after intervention) and T3 (second follow-up, 18 months after intervention)
|
Four tasks implemented in the Android application Psych Lab 101 (Neurobehavioral Systems, 2020) will be used to assess children's cognitive abilities including selective attention, working memory, interference control and cognitive control.
Higher scores indicate higher levels of students' cognitive abilities.
A stronger improvement of cognitive functioning in the intervention group compared to the control group is hypothesized.
|
The Psych Lab 101 application will be used at T1 (baseline, prior to intervention), T2 (first follow-up, 6 months after intervention) and T3 (second follow-up, 18 months after intervention)
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Change of students' academic performance
Time Frame: The standardized achievement tests will be used at T1 (baseline, prior to intervention), T2 (first follow-up, 6 months after intervention) and T3 (second follow-up, 18 months after intervention).
|
Purpose-built tests will be used to assess students' numeracy and literacy skills.
Higher scores indicate higher levels of students' academic skills.
In addition, students' grades in the previous term's exams will be obtained from the school administration.
A change in academic performance in the intervention group is hypothesized.
|
The standardized achievement tests will be used at T1 (baseline, prior to intervention), T2 (first follow-up, 6 months after intervention) and T3 (second follow-up, 18 months after intervention).
|
Change of students' social competence
Time Frame: The Social Cognitive Map Technique - peer nomination will be used at T1 (baseline, prior to intervention), T2 (first follow-up, 6 months after intervention) and T3 (second follow-up, 18 months after intervention).
|
The Social Cognitive Map Technique will assess students' social competence through peer nominations.
Higher scores indicate higher levels of students' social competence.
A change of social competence in the intervention group is hypothesized.
|
The Social Cognitive Map Technique - peer nomination will be used at T1 (baseline, prior to intervention), T2 (first follow-up, 6 months after intervention) and T3 (second follow-up, 18 months after intervention).
|
Change of peer victimization
Time Frame: The MPVS-24 will be used at T1 (baseline, prior to intervention), T2 (first follow-up, 6 months after intervention) and T3 (second follow-up, 18 months after intervention).
|
The Multidimensional Peer Victimization Scale (MPVS-24; Joseph & Stockton, 2018) assesses children's experiences of violence by peers using the 24-item version.
A change of exposure to violence in the intervention group is hypothesized.
|
The MPVS-24 will be used at T1 (baseline, prior to intervention), T2 (first follow-up, 6 months after intervention) and T3 (second follow-up, 18 months after intervention).
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Tobias Hecker, Prof. Dr., Bielefeld University
Publications and helpful links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
- HE 8505/1-1
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Violence by Teachers
-
Bielefeld UniversityCompleted
-
Bielefeld UniversityUniversity of Konstanz; P4H GlobalRecruitingViolence by TeachersHaiti
-
University of Wisconsin, MadisonCompleted
-
University of CoimbraCompassionate Mind Foundation; Reed FoundationCompleted
-
King Edward Medical UniversityCompletedSchool Mental Health Training of TeachersPakistan
-
The University of Tennessee, KnoxvilleCompletedMath Teachers (Grades 2-8) | Math Students (Grades 2-8)United States
-
Johns Hopkins UniversityNational Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (NIMHD)RecruitingViolence, Domestic | Violence | Violence, Sexual | Violence, Physical | Violence, Gender-Based | Violence-Related SymptomUnited States
-
University of PittsburghCenters for Disease Control and PreventionNot yet recruitingViolence, Domestic | Violence in Adolescence | Violence, Sexual | Violence, Physical | Violence, Non-accidental | Social Cohesion | Violence, Structural | Community ViolenceUnited States
-
Medical Research Council, South AfricaUniversity of GhanaUnknownSexual Violence | Domestic Violence | Physical ViolenceGhana
-
Karolinska InstitutetRegion Stockholm; Jane and Dan Olsson Foundation for Scientific PurposesCompletedDomestic Violence | Family Violence | Intimate-partner ViolenceSweden
Clinical Trials on Interaction Competencies with Children - for Teachers (ICC-T)
-
Bielefeld UniversityMclean Hospital; University of Konstanz; Shifa International Hospital; Shifa FoundationRecruiting
-
Bielefeld UniversityUniversity of Konstanz; P4H GlobalRecruitingViolence by TeachersHaiti
-
Bielefeld UniversityCompleted
-
University of KonstanzBielefeld University; Alexander von Humboldt AssociationCompleted
-
University of KonstanzBielefeld University; Dar es Salaam University College of EducationCompleted
-
Bielefeld UniversityTechnical University of Munich; Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences and other collaboratorsRecruiting
-
University of AlbertaAlberta Innovates Health SolutionsNot yet recruiting
-
Bruno RhinerUniversity of Arkansas; West Virginia UniversityRecruiting