Dry Needling Versus Conservative Treatment in the Rectus Femoris Muscle Approach.

February 4, 2024 updated by: Prof. Dr. Daniel Pecos Martín, University of Alcala

Application of the Deep Versus Superficial Dry Needling and Stretching Technique in the Treatment of the Quadriceps Rectus Femoris Muscle.

In recent years, dry needling techniques have become widespread in the field of musculoskeletal pain treatment. Specifically, the management of myofascial trigger points has been the focus of these techniques.

One of the objectives has been to improve the flexibility of those muscles that, due to the presence of myofascial trigger points, had a decrease in this parameter.

This study aims to determine whether the application of a dry needling technique is more effective than analytical stretching of the muscle.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Hypothesis of the study Deep dry needling of latent trigger points of the rectus femoris produces greater effects on flexibility, strength and pain than superficial dry needling or stretching.

- Overall objective: To compare the differences that occur in flexibility, strength and pain threshold to pressure after the application of deep dry needling, superficial dry needling and stretching on latent trigger points of the rectus femoris.

- Specific objectives To determine the changes produced by deep dry needling on flexibility, strength and pain threshold to pressure.

To determine the changes produced by superficial dry needling on flexibility, strength and pain threshold to pressure.

To determine the changes in flexibility, strength and pain threshold to pressure produced by conventional assisted stretching.

To check if the changes remain after 7 days of the application of the techniques.

To assess the inter-rater reliability of the Goniometer APP in the study sample.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

90

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Madrid
      • Alcalá De Henares, Madrid, Spain, 28805
        • Centro Investigación Fisioterapia y Dolor
      • Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain, 28805
        • Physiotherapy and Pain Institute

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Men and women between 18 and 65 years old.
  2. To have at least 70º of knee flexion.
  3. Be aware of and accept the study criteria (informed consent).
  4. Healthy subjects, without previous hip or knee pathology or involved musculature.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. To have pain.
  2. Having pain in the quadriceps or hip at the time of the study.
  3. Currently following physiotherapy or analgesic treatment.
  4. Belenophobia (fear of needles).
  5. Recent surgery or trauma in the area.
  6. Pregnancy.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Deep dry needling
With the subject lying supine, we will first locate a latent myofascial trigger point in the rectus femoris muscle.Subsequently, we will apply a deep dry needling technique to the latent trigger point and make 10-12 incisions.
In-and-out into different directions technique to encounter sensitive spots in an MTrP region.
Experimental: Superficial dry needling
With the subject lying supine, we will first locate a latent myofascial trigger point in the rectus femoris muscle.Subsequently, we will apply a superficial dry needling technique to the latent trigger point. Once the needle is placed in the subcutaneous cellular tissue, we manipulate the needle by twisting it until an unpleasant response is provoked. We keep the needle for 5 minutes
This technique involves inserting a needle at a depth that is into the subcutaneous tissue and may be combined with manipulation of the needle while in situ.
Experimental: Passive muscle stretching
With the patient positioned in the supine position, the pelvis stabilized with a strap and the lower extremity where we are going to apply the rectus femoris muscle stretch placed outside the table, we perform a passive stretching technique, increasing hip extension and knee flexion until the patient feels the tension. The position is held for 60 seconds.
Type of stretching in which you stay in one position for a set time. In this case, hip extension and knee flexion.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Knee joint range
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 7 days
Knee flexion motion assessment by using the Goniometer APP, which is a digital goniometer that has proven its reliability and validity.The overall concordance coefficient has shown very good to excellent with active measurements (range, 0.60-0.97).
Change from baseline at 7 days
Muscle strength
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 7 days
Force will be measured by a manual dynamometer (microFET®2, Hoggan Scientific LLC). Measurements will be taken in Newtons (N). It will be evaluated in the movements of flexion of knee. Manual dynamometry has proven to be a tool with excellent intra-examiner reliability to assess isometric force in flexion of the knee, with an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.96 (0.93-0.98).
Change from baseline at 7 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pressure Pain Threshold (PPT)
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 7 days
An algometer Wagner FPI 10-WA will be used to determine the PPT in rectus femoris trigger points
Change from baseline at 7 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 30, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 15, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

February 5, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 9, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 9, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

July 20, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 6, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 4, 2024

Last Verified

February 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Dry Needling

Clinical Trials on Deep Dry Needling

3
Subscribe