Usefulness of Doppler Ultrasound Carried Out by the Vascular Surgeon After Loco-regional Anesthesia for Preferred Access

July 15, 2021 updated by: Aurélien Hostalrich, University Paul Sabatier of Toulouse

Preoperative vascular mapping with echo-Doppler is acknowledged as indispensable to create an arteriovenous fistula for haemodialysis (AVF). The conditions for performing this examination are not always ideal (venous vasospasm in cool temperatures, variability of the volume status in the dialysis patient).

On the other hand, the use of a loco-regional anaesthesia (LRA) results in the vasodilation of the limb thus rendering it possible to use the veins which were initially considered too small.

The aim of this study is to assess the functionality of our AVF when ultrasound identification was used by the surgeon after the LRA. These results have been compared with those of the preceding year during which this identification was not implemented.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The investigators conducted a prospective study in the year 2020 during which all the patients (n=90) had an AVF creation with preoperative venous identification by the surgeon at university hospital of TOULOUSE (France)(echo group).

All the patients gave their consent, and the database was anonymised upon completion.

All patients were seen in a preoperative consultation with venous mapping carried out by a physician specialised in the use of Doppler ultrasonography. Following this consultation, a type of fistula was programmed in accordance with the Silva criteria (notably a vein with a diameter of over 2.5mm and an artery of 2mm). On the day of the operation, loco-regional anaesthesia was performed under sonographic guidance according to the previous description . The decision of the block approach and the choice of local aesthetic agent was left to the discretion of the anaesthesiologist.

The surgeon carried out an ultrasound and modification of the type of AVF was then made if the Silva criteria differed from those described during initial consultation. The modification could be a more distal creation, a more proximal creation, a change of vein or a change of artery.

The investigators succeeded to create more distal AVF when the vein had a diameter of over 2.5mm after LRA. Furthermore, the investigators reassembled the AVF when the vein appeared too small or residual (for example, following the attachment of an infusion having occurred between mapping and the surgery).

The same team of 4 surgeons participated in the creation of the AVF for both the echo group and the control group.

All patients were given a preoperative assessment of their heart function and cardiovascular risk factors (HTA, diabetes, smoking, dyslipidaemia). Prior strokes and coronary diseases were also registered as well as the patients' BMI and American society of anesthesiology score.

The definition of the good development of the haemodialysis access is based on the National Kidney Foundation's criteria: Blood flow>600ml, diameter over 6mm and lower depth of 6mm. On the other hand, permeability was based on the criteria of the Society for Vascular Surgery : primary permeability lasts from the creation to the first dilation episode or transposition of anastomosis required to maintain the access. Assisted primary permeability ends at the time of the first occlusion episode. Secondary permeability ends with the abandonment or the definitive withdrawal of the AVF due to failure.

The first postoperative consultation took place at around the 6th week after the creation which is the normal time necessary for the smooth development of an AVF .

The investigators compared all these results with our control group which consists of all the patients who had a native AVF placed during the year 2019 without having received immediate preoperative ultrasound and therefore there was no alteration in the surgical project in relation to that planned at the time of the consultation. Demographic data was similarly compiled and all the evaluation criteria compared

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

193

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Toulouse, France, 31059
        • aurelien Hostalrich

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

All the patients who had an AVF creation with preoperative venous identification by the surgeon at CHU de TOULOUSE during the year 2020.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Native AVF access
  • During the year 2020
  • Preoperative mapping during the consultation
  • Loco-regional anesthesia

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Redo surgery

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Echo group
All the patients (n=90) who had an AVF creation with preoperative venous identification by the surgeon at CHU de TOULOUSE (echo group).
Just after locoregional anesthesia, the surgeon perform a duplex ultrasound to determinate if the target vessel chosen to create the arterio-venous fistulae match with the pre-operative duplex performed during the consultation. So the plan can be changed such as more distal, more proximal creation, changing vein or artery target.
Control
All the patients (n=93) who had a native AVF placed during the year 2019 without having received immediate preoperative ultrasound and therefore there was no alteration in the surgical project in relation to that planned at the time of the consultation

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Functionality of the AVF at the time of the postoperative
Time Frame: 6 weeks
An AVF is defined as functional if all the criteria of the good development of the haemodialysis access (based on the National Kidney Foundation's criteria) are present : Blood flow>600ml, diameter over 6mm and lower depth of 6mm
6 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The rate of planning change between the surgical project at the time of the consultation and the AVF that is finally placed
Time Frame: During the surgery
During the surgery
Primary, assisted primary and secondary permeability of our accesses
Time Frame: 12 months
permeability was based on the criteria of the Society for Vascular Surgery : primary permeability lasts from the creation to the first dilation episode or transposition of anastomosis required to maintain the access. Assisted primary permeability ends at the time of the first occlusion episode. Secondary permeability ends with the abandonment or the definitive withdrawal of the AVF due to failure
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

January 1, 2020

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

February 1, 2021

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

July 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 9, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 15, 2021

First Posted (ACTUAL)

July 27, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

July 27, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 15, 2021

Last Verified

July 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Arterio-venous Fistula

Clinical Trials on Duplex ultrasound performed by the surgeon after locoregional anesthesia

3
Subscribe