- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04979351
The Effect of Post Colonoscopy Abdominal Massage on Abdominal Pain, Distension, Discomfort and Patient Satisfaction
The Effect of Post Colonoscopy Abdominal Massage on Abdominal Pain, Distension, Discomfort and Patient Satisfaction: A Randomized Controlled Study Protocol
Background: Abdominal pain, distension, and discomfort are the most frequently seen side effects after colonoscopy. These side effects can cause physical and mental results and increased workloads and care costs. Additionally, the satisfaction of the patients with the colonoscopy process may affect their willingness to undergo repeated colonoscopies in the future which may be required for the surveillance of colon malignity. Currently, there are no studies evaluating the effects of abdominal massage on post colonoscopy these abdominal symptoms. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of post colonoscopy abdominal massage on abdominal pain, distension, discomfort, and patient satisfaction.
Methods: This study was designed as a prospective randomized controlled study. Participants meeting inclusion criteria will be assigned to intervention and control groups using a random number generator. Participants assigned to the intervention group will receive abdominal massages twice a day after colonoscopy, and participants assigned to the control group will receive only "routine care". The abdominal pain, distension, discomfort, and satisfaction levels of the patients will be evaluated using the Visual Analogue Scale.
Conclusions: New approaches are needed to improve the physiological and psychological health levels of patients after colonoscopy and help them return to their daily life activities and social lives faster. The trial will provide valuable evidence to inform clinical application and help evaluate the effects of the use of the relevant intervention.
Study Overview
Detailed Description
Abdominal pain, bloating, and discomfort are the most frequently problems experienced by patients undergoing colonoscopy. These problems are thought to be caused by several factors such as the duration of the process, the technical difficulty level of the process, distension caused by air insufflation, and the expertise level of the endoscopist. These problems are experienced by approximately a third of patients undergoing colonoscopy, and may last from a few hours to a few days. In a recent study, 44% of patients were found to experience such minor side effects 24 hours after colonoscopy, and 23% were found to experience them after a 30 day follow up. Although these problems are dubbed minor side effects, they may cause serious results for patients with regard to physical comfort and mental stress and may necessitate patients to be monitored post colonoscopy and followed up closely. This may lead to an increase in costs by increasing the length of hospital stay and nursing care requirements. Additionally, the satisfaction of the patients with the colonoscopy process may affect their willingness to undergo repeated colonoscopies in the future which may be required for the surveillance of colon malignity. For these reasons, decreasing post colonoscopy abdominal pain, distension, and discomfort and increasing patient satisfaction may increase the acceptance of future colonoscopy screening for colorectal cancers.
Studies focused on decreasing abdominal symptoms after colonoscopy and increasing patient comfort and satisfaction have yielded varying results. For example, while some studies have reported that rectal tube application after colonoscopy reduces pain and increases patient comfort and satisfaction, in another study, it was determined that rectal tube application post colonoscopy had no effect on abdominal distension, pain, discomfort, and patient satisfaction after the process and 24 hours later. In another study, rectal aspiration applied right after colonoscopy was found to be more effective in decreasing abdominal symptoms compared to the application of rectal tubes after colonoscopy. In another study where total colonic decompression through repeating cecal intubation after colonoscopy was applied, the method was found to decrease the distension complaints of patients in the early post colonoscopy period from 59% to 25%. However, in this study, no significant difference between the groups that did and did not receive decompression with regard to abdominal pain and distension could be found 24 to 48 hours after the procedure. In yet another study, no significant difference with regard to pain intensity could be found between the aspiration of air in the curves of the colon without repeated intubation while the colonoscope was being taken out and rectal aspiration.
Abdominal massaging has been shown to help improve symptoms in patients with severe constipation. In the literature, it has been reported that abdominal massage relaxes the abdominal muscles and stimulates the excretory activity by supporting the intestine, decrease discomfort and pain in individuals with abdominal pain related to cramps or flatulence, and increase the quality of life. Moreover, it is a non-invasive and safe non-pharmacological method. It has no known side effects and does not require any cost.
In this study, it was assumed post-colonoscopy abdominal massage can improve their abdominal symptoms. However, to date, there is no study evaluating the effects of abdominal massage on abdominal symptoms after colonoscopy. Therefore, a prospective study was designed to evaluate the aspect of post-colonoscopy abdominal massage that concerns endoscopy nurses, namely its effect on abdominal pain, bloating, discomfort and patient satisfaction.
Aim
The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of post colonoscopy abdominal massage on abdominal pain, distension, discomfort, and patient satisfaction.
Null hypothesis
There will be no significant difference between patients receiving abdominal massage post colonoscopy and those not receiving such an intervention with regard to abdominal pain, distension, discomfort, and patient satisfaction.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Istanbul, Turkey, 34384
- Prof. Dr. Cemil Taşçıoğlu City Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- being of 18 years of age and above
- owning a cell phone
- having a body mass index below 30
- being conscious and having location
- people, and time orientation
- having no communication barriers
- being able to communicate in Turkish
- giving written informed consent to participate in the study
Exclusion Criteria:
- were receiving sedation
- having previously received intestine resection or other intestinal surgery
- having an uncontrolled psychopathological illness
- receiving colonoscopy for treatment
- having active lower gastrointestinal system bleeding
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Abdominal Massage Group
Abdominal massage for 15 minutes twice a day application.
|
Abdominal massage will be applied twice a day.
|
No Intervention: Placebo Group
Abdominal massage was not applied.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Abdominal pain
Time Frame: The end of the second day.
|
Abdominal pain will be evaluated with the Visual Analog Scale Zero = minimum value Ten = maximum value
|
The end of the second day.
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Abdominal distension
Time Frame: The end of the second day.
|
Abdominal distension will be evaluated with the Visual Analog Scale Zero = minimum value Ten = maximum value
|
The end of the second day.
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Comfort
Time Frame: The end of the second day.
|
Abdominal comfort will be evaluated with the Visual Analog Scale Zero = minimum value Ten = maximum value
|
The end of the second day.
|
High Satisfaction
Time Frame: The end of the second day.
|
Patient satisfaction will be evaluated with the Visual Analog Scale Zero = minimum value Ten = maximum value
|
The end of the second day.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: DİLEK ÖZTÜRK, MSc, specify Unaffiliated
- Study Director: Aysel GÜRKAN, PhD, specify Unaffiliated
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Gallagher EJ, Liebman M, Bijur PE. Prospective validation of clinically important changes in pain severity measured on a visual analog scale. Ann Emerg Med. 2001 Dec;38(6):633-8. doi: 10.1067/mem.2001.118863.
- Chou R, Gordon DB, de Leon-Casasola OA, Rosenberg JM, Bickler S, Brennan T, Carter T, Cassidy CL, Chittenden EH, Degenhardt E, Griffith S, Manworren R, McCarberg B, Montgomery R, Murphy J, Perkal MF, Suresh S, Sluka K, Strassels S, Thirlby R, Viscusi E, Walco GA, Warner L, Weisman SJ, Wu CL. Management of Postoperative Pain: A Clinical Practice Guideline From the American Pain Society, the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, and the American Society of Anesthesiologists' Committee on Regional Anesthesia, Executive Committee, and Administrative Council. J Pain. 2016 Feb;17(2):131-57. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2015.12.008. Erratum In: J Pain. 2016 Apr;17(4):508-10. Dosage error in article text.
- Sumanac K, Zealley I, Fox BM, Rawlinson J, Salena B, Marshall JK, Stevenson GW, Hunt RH. Minimizing postcolonoscopy abdominal pain by using CO(2) insufflation: a prospective, randomized, double blind, controlled trial evaluating a new commercially available CO(2) delivery system. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002 Aug;56(2):190-4. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(02)70176-4.
- Liu Z, Sakakibara R, Odaka T, Uchiyama T, Yamamoto T, Ito T, Hattori T. Mechanism of abdominal massage for difficult defecation in a patient with myelopathy (HAM/TSP). J Neurol. 2005 Oct;252(10):1280-2. doi: 10.1007/s00415-005-0825-9. Epub 2005 May 20. No abstract available.
- Ayan M, Tas U, Sogut E, Arici S, Karaman S, Esen M, Demirturk F. [Comparing efficiencies of diclofenac sodium and paracetamol in patients with primary dysmenorrhea pain by using Visual Analog Scale]. Agri. 2013;25(2):78-82. doi: 10.5505/agri.2013.42103. Turkish.
- Lynch I, Hayes A, Buffum MD, Conners EE. Insufflation using carbon dioxide versus room air during colonoscopy: comparison of patient comfort, recovery time, and nursing resources. Gastroenterol Nurs. 2015 May-Jun;38(3):211-7. doi: 10.1097/SGA.0000000000000109.
- McClurg D, Lowe-Strong A. Does abdominal massage relieve constipation? Nurs Times. 2011 Mar 29-Apr 4;107(12):20-2.
- Lamas K, Lindholm L, Stenlund H, Engstrom B, Jacobsson C. Effects of abdominal massage in management of constipation--a randomized controlled trial. Int J Nurs Stud. 2009 Jun;46(6):759-67. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.01.007. Epub 2009 Feb 12.
- Devitt J, Shellman L, Gardner K, Nichols LW. Using positioning after a colonoscopy for patient comfort management. Gastroenterol Nurs. 2011 Mar-Apr;34(2):93-100. doi: 10.1097/SGA.0b013e31820f9ac3.
- Kim SY, Kim HS, Park HJ. Adverse events related to colonoscopy: Global trends and future challenges. World J Gastroenterol. 2019 Jan 14;25(2):190-204. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i2.190.
- Arabul M, Kandemir A, Celik M, Alper E, Akpinar Z, Aslan F, Vatansever S, Unsal B. Impact of an information video before colonoscopy on patient satisfaction and anxiety. Turk J Gastroenterol. 2012;23(5):523-9. doi: 10.4318/tjg.2012.0416.
- Gagliese L, Weizblit N, Ellis W, Chan VWS. The measurement of postoperative pain: a comparison of intensity scales in younger and older surgical patients. Pain. 2005 Oct;117(3):412-420. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2005.07.004.
- Uysal N, Eser I, Akpinar H. The effect of abdominal massage on gastric residual volume: a randomized controlled trial. Gastroenterol Nurs. 2012 Mar-Apr;35(2):117-23. doi: 10.1097/SGA.0b013e31824c235a.
- Preece J. Introducing abdominal massage in palliative care for the relief of constipation. Complement Ther Nurs Midwifery. 2002 May;8(2):101-5. doi: 10.1054/ctnm.2002.0610.
- Steffenssen MW, Al-Najami I, Zimmermann-Nielsen E, Baatrup G. Patient-reported complications related to colonoscopy: a prospective feasibility study of an email-based survey. Acta Oncol. 2019;58(sup1):S65-S70. doi: 10.1080/0284186X.2018.1535188. Epub 2018 Dec 7.
- Erstad DJ, Krowsoski LS, Kaafarani HM. Abdominal Pain After Colonoscopy. Gastroenterology. 2017 Feb;152(3):486-487. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.08.060. Epub 2017 Jan 3. No abstract available.
- Yi CH, Liu TT, Lei WY, Hung JS, Chen CL. Influence of Rectal Decompression on Abdominal Symptoms and Anorectal Physiology following Colonoscopy in Healthy Adults. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2016;2016:4101248. doi: 10.1155/2016/4101248. Epub 2016 Aug 29.
- Liu TT, Yi CH, Lei WY, Yu HC, Hung JS, Chen CL. Comparison of rectal suction versus rectal tube insertion for reducing abdominal symptoms immediately after unsedated colonoscopy. Endosc Int Open. 2016 Jun;4(6):E725-9. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1392223. Epub 2015 Dec 15.
- Steinberg EN, Howden CW. Randomized controlled trial of rectal tube placement for the management of abdominal distension following colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 1997 Nov;46(5):444-6. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(97)70038-5.
- Hilzenrat N, Fich A, Odes HS, Krugliak P, Eidelman L, Gaspar N, Weisberg G, Rosenthal A, Delgado JL, Ginat R, Sperber AD. Does insertion of a rectal tube after colonoscopy reduce patient discomfort and improve satisfaction? Gastrointest Endosc. 2003 Jan;57(1):54-7. doi: 10.1067/mge.2003.47.
- Lee JG, Vigil H, Leung JW. A randomized controlled trial of total colonic decompression after colonoscopy to improve patient comfort. Am J Gastroenterol. 2001 Jan;96(1):95-100. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2001.03458.x.
- Sinclair M. The use of abdominal massage to treat chronic constipation. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2011 Oct;15(4):436-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2010.07.007. Epub 2010 Aug 25.
- Dehghan M, Fatehi Poor A, Mehdipoor R, Ahmadinejad M. Does abdominal massage improve gastrointestinal functions of intensive care patients with an endotracheal tube?: A randomized clinical trial. Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2018 Feb;30:122-128. doi: 10.1016/j.ctcp.2017.12.018. Epub 2017 Dec 30.
- Kjeldsen HB, Klausen TW, Rosenberg J. Preferred Presentation of the Visual Analog Scale for Measurement of Postoperative Pain. Pain Pract. 2016 Nov;16(8):980-984. doi: 10.1111/papr.12344. Epub 2015 Aug 27.
- Altun Ugras G, Yuksel S, Isik MT, Tasdelen B, Dogan H, Mutluay O. Effect of abdominal massage on bowel evacuation in neurosurgical intensive care patients. Nurs Crit Care. 2022 Jul;27(4):558-566. doi: 10.1111/nicc.12575. Epub 2020 Nov 12.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- CemilTascıogluERHO
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
IPD Sharing Time Frame
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
Study Data/Documents
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Healthy
-
Prevent Age Resort "Pervaya Liniya"RecruitingHealthy Aging | Healthy Diet | Healthy LifestyleRussian Federation
-
Maastricht University Medical CenterCompletedHealthy Volunteers | Healthy Subjects | Healthy AdultsNetherlands
-
Yale UniversityNot yet recruitingHealth-related Benefits of Introducing Table Olives Into the Diet of Young Adults: Olives For HealthHealthy Diet | Healthy Lifestyle | Healthy Nutrition | CholesterolUnited States
-
Hasselt UniversityRecruitingHealthy | Healthy AgingBelgium
-
Galera Therapeutics, Inc.Syneos HealthCompleted
-
Galera Therapeutics, Inc.Syneos HealthCompletedHealthy | Healthy VolunteersAustralia
-
University of PennsylvaniaActive, not recruitingHealthy | Healthy AgingUnited States
-
Chalmers University of TechnologyGöteborg UniversityCompletedHealthy | Nutrition, HealthySweden
-
University of ManitobaNot yet recruitingHealthy | Healthy Diet
Clinical Trials on Abdominal Massage
-
TC Erciyes UniversityCompletedAbdominal Pain | Satisfaction, Patient | DistentionTurkey
-
Glasgow Caledonian UniversityNHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde; Baily Thomas Charitable FundActive, not recruitingConstipationUnited Kingdom
-
University Hospital, Clermont-FerrandNot yet recruitingDigestive System Disease | Preterm Birth ComplicationFrance
-
Amasya UniversityRecruiting
-
University of Health Sciences LahoreNot yet recruitingGastric Retention
-
Air Force Military Medical University, ChinaRecruitingCommon Bile Duct Stone | Abdominal MassageChina
-
Mersin UniversityCompletedIntraabdominal PressureTurkey
-
Mersin UniversityCompletedConstipation | Abdominal Massage
-
Mansoura UniversityNot yet recruiting
-
Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa (IUC)RecruitingNutrition Disorders | Nurse's Role | Massage | Intensive Care Units, PediatricTurkey