Effects of Constructive Debriefing on Procedural Skills and Satisfaction of Nursing Students in Low Fidelity Context. A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Constructive Debriefing

Purposes: This study was set out to measure the effectiveness of constructive debriefing on procedural skills and satisfaction of nursing students in the low-fidelity context in comparison to traditional debriefing.

Method: The randomized controlled (Parallel double blinded) trial design was used.

Participant: Out of 51 approached, 34 students were selected from the list of participants by a data collector using simple random sampling technique. Following, block randomization was applied using Microsoft Excel to create two equivalent (n=17) groups i.e. experimental and non-experimental.

Setting: The study was conducted in private college of nursing Islamabad Pakistan Intervention: The experimental group received constructive debriefing and non-experimental group received the traditional debriefing. The data were collected using suctioning, sterile dressing skills checklist, and debriefing reflection subscale of Satisfaction with Simulation Experience Scale.

Study Overview

• Status: Completed
• Conditions: Procedural Skill. Learning
• Intervention / Treatment: Other: constructive debriefing

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Actual): 34
• Phase: Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

Study Locations

• Pakistan
  • Punjab
    • Islamabad, Punjab, Pakistan, 46000
      • Bushra

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 20 years to 27 years (Adult)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No
• Genders Eligible for Study: All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

- Students who were enrolled in the Adult Health Nursing (AHN) course were included in the study

Exclusion Criteria:

• Studentsnts who were repeating the course and were absent for two or more days during skills demonstration and signing off were excluded

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: Other
• Allocation: Randomized
• Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
• Masking: Double

Number of Arms

2

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: CONSTRUCTIVE DEBRIEFING; interventional group	Other: constructive debriefing; Constructive debriefing was applied to an interventional group Traditional debriefing was applied on noninterventional group; Other Names: traditional debrieifng
No Intervention: traditional debriefing; noninterventional group

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
learning scores	learning scores of participant	8months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
satisfaction level	measure satisfaction level of participant	8months

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: Shifa Tameer-e-Millat University

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start (Actual): August 5, 2019
• Primary Completion (Actual): January 1, 2020
• Study Completion (Actual): May 28, 2020

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: July 28, 2021
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: July 28, 2021
• First Posted (Actual): August 5, 2021

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Actual): August 5, 2021
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: July 28, 2021
• Last Verified: July 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Keywords: Debriefing, Procedural skills, Satisfaction, Reflection, Critical thinking
• Other Study ID Numbers: IRB# 264-754-2019

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

• Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?: Undecided

Drug and device information, study documents

• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product: No
• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product: No
• product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.: No