Efficacy of Soluble Dexamethasone in Refractory Sciatica (Dexhia)

January 31, 2024 updated by: Nantes University Hospital

Efficacy of Soluble Dexamethasone by Echo-guided Infiltration Through the Sacrococcygeal Hiatus in Refractory Sciatica: a Prospective Randomised Double-blind Study Versus Placebo

This is a phase 3 prospective randomised double-blind study versus placebo, measuring the efficacy of soluble Dexamethasone by echo-guided infiltrations through the sacro-coccygeal hiatus in intractable sciatica

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Injection of 4ml of Dexamethasone Phosphate Soluble or 4ml of saline solution depending on the randomisation arm

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

109

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Nantes, France, 44093
        • Nantes University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with sciatica of disc origin (radio-clinical concordance on MRI or CT) postero-lateral
  • Duration of evolution greater than 3 weeks despite analgesic / AINS treatment, and less than 3 months
  • EVA sciatica pain > 4/10
  • Oswestry 30 at inclusion
  • Patient aged 18 years and older
  • Patient affiliated to a social security scheme
  • Patient able to understand the protocol and having signed an informed consent
  • Patient with an indication for corticosteroid infiltration in the context of their pathology

Criteria for non-inclusion

  • Signs or risks of infection, in particular signs of virosis
  • Poor local skin condition
  • Anticoagulation with VKA or anti-Xa, or haemorrhagic disease
  • Neurological deficit < 3/5 or signs of cauda equina irritation
  • Tarlov's cyst or low dural sac below week 4
  • Hypersensitivity to Lidocaine, Dexamethasone, or any of its excipients
  • Infiltration of the spine within the previous 3 months
  • Patient with bilateral sciatica
  • Patient with sciatica of osteoarthritic origin
  • Patients with chronic respiratory insufficiency
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding women or women refusing effective contraception until M3
  • Patient deprived of liberty or under legal protection (guardianship or curatorship)
  • Patient under court protection
  • Patients participating in another clinical research protocol involving a drug or medical device
  • Patients unable to follow the protocol, as judged by the investigator
  • Patient refusing to participate in the study
  • Patient with clinically narrowed lumbar canal
  • Patient with polyneuropathy or myelopathy
  • Patient with sequelae of neuropathic pain

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: group A
HSC one injection of 4 mL soluble Dexamethasone phosphate (16 mg) (equivalent to 100 mg Prednisone), followed by up to 16 mL saline (depending on tolerance)
HSC injection of 4mL
Placebo Comparator: group B
HSC one injection of 4mL of saline and then up to 16 mL of saline (depending on tolerance)
HSC injection of 4mL

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Effectiveness assessed by classical global algo-functional index: OSWESTRY
Time Frame: Week 3
Week 3

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Value of Eva scale for evaluated effectiveness on lower back pain
Time Frame: Month 6
Month 6
Value of Eva scale for evaluated effectiveness on lower back pain
Time Frame: Week 1
Week 1
Value of Eva scale for evaluated effectiveness on lower back pain
Time Frame: Week 3
Week 3
Value of Eva scale for evaluated effectiveness on lower back pain
Time Frame: Week 6
Week 6
Value of Eva scale for evaluated effectiveness on lower back pain
Time Frame: Month 3
Month 3
Value of Eva scale for evaluated effectiveness on sciatic pain
Time Frame: Week 1
Week 1
Value of Eva scale for evaluated effectiveness on sciatic pain
Time Frame: Week 3
Week 3
Value of Eva scale for evaluated effectiveness on sciatic pain
Time Frame: Week 6
Week 6
Value of Eva scale for evaluated effectiveness on sciatic pain
Time Frame: Month 6
Month 6
Number of days off work
Time Frame: Month 6
Month 6
Value of score to scale Oswestry
Time Frame: Month 6
Month 6
Value of score to scale Oswestry
Time Frame: Week 1
Week 1
Value of score to scale Oswestry
Time Frame: Week 6
Week 6
Value of score to scale Oswestry
Time Frame: Month 3
Month 3
Value of score to SF36 self questionnaires
Time Frame: Month 6
Month 6
Value of score to SF36 self questionnaires
Time Frame: Week 1
Week 1
Value of score to SF36 self questionnaires
Time Frame: Week 3
Week 3
Value of score to SF36 self questionnaires
Time Frame: Week 6
Week 6
Value of score to SF36 self questionnaires
Time Frame: Month 3
Month 3
Percentage of second injections required
Time Frame: Month 6
Month 6
Number of patients undergoing secondary surgery
Time Frame: Month 6
Month 6
Result of Clinical parameters
Time Frame: week 3
week 3
Result of Imaging parameters
Time Frame: week 3
week 3
Number of secondary effects
Time Frame: Month 6
Month 6

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Maugars, Nantes University Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 16, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 15, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

March 15, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 4, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 4, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

August 11, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 1, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 31, 2024

Last Verified

January 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Sciatica

Clinical Trials on Dexamethasone phosphate

3
Subscribe