COVAG - Covid-19 Antigen Study - the Diagnostic Efficacy of SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Detection Tests (COVAG)

COVAG Study - Covid-19 Antigen Study

The aim of the COVAG study (Covid-19 Antigen study) is to assess the diagnostic efficacy of two of the most used rapid antigen tests (Roche & Abbott).

The study will be performed at the Corona Test Center Stuttgart Cannstatter Wasen. Approximately 2000 patients will be enrolled after having signed the Informed Consent Form (ICF). Each patient will receive 3 nasopharyngeal swabs. Two for the rapid antigen tests from Roche and Abbott and one for the RT-PCR. Furthermore an anamnesis, short clinical examination and blood draw is done. The blood is examined for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies and basic laboratory tests to be communicated to participants.

Study Overview

• Status: Completed
• Conditions: COVID-19; SARS-CoV2 Infection; SARS (Disease)
• Intervention / Treatment: Device: 3 nasopharyngeal swab

Detailed Description

1. Background:

   Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has quickly spread worldwide from Wuhan (China) since December 2019. Reliable diagnostic technologies are pivotal to the fight against COVID-19. While real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR) based testing of respiratory specimens remains the gold standard for COVID- 19 diagnostics, several commercial assays for antibodies against (SARS-CoV-2) have emerged during the previous months (Stocking et al., 2020).

   Measuring the presence or absence of viral proteins (antigens), antigen tests may provide results diagnosing an active SARS-CoV-2 infection much faster than RT-PCR or equivalent tests. It has been argued that antigen tests may have a lower sensitivity than RT-PCR or equivalent RNA-based tests, and as a result they are much more likely to give false-negative results in individuals with lower amounts of virus. This may possibly make them unreliable in individuals with an asymptomatic course of the disease, in individuals in the first days of infection, and later than 5-7 days after onset of symptoms (SYNLAB press release, 22.09.2020).

2. Objective:

   The objective of this non-interventional study is to demonstrate that rapid antigen tests for SARS-CoV-2 (Abbott and Roche) provide fast results and perform equally well than RT-PCR, at least in symptomatic patients with high viral loads.

3. Study Design:

   The study will be performed in at the Corona Test Center Stuttgart Cannstatter Wasen operated by Dr. med. Hans-Jörg Wertenauer, Stuttgart, in close collaboration with the SYNLAB MVZ Leinfelden-Echterdingen GmbH. Approximately 2000 patients will be enrolled at after having signed the Informed Consent Form (ICF). Upon a scheduled study duration of eight weeks, the investigators will be able to collect the required 2000 samples (50 patients per day).

   One study visit is planned for data and blood collection (15,5 ml), antigen tests, RT-PCR, serological tests, basic laboratory tests to be communicated to participants, and ancillary blood tests (incriminated to be related to COVID-19 like inflammatory markers, and micronutrients and vitamins). These will be performed at the at the SYNLAB MVZ Leinfelden GmbH. Aliquots of the materials collected will be stored -20 degrees for control measurements and ancillary tests, maximally for one year after the last patient was enrolled into the study.

4. Rationale:

   In the past weeks, there has been much discussion about rapid antigen tests for SARS- CoV-2. The most recent generation of these tests, available from several different suppliers, are expected to perform well in patients with high viral loads. This is usually the case approximately 3-10 days after infection with the virus, when the person is contagious, and may be asymptomatic or in the first days of symptoms.

   It is therefore hoped that rapid antigen tests can support diagnosis of COVID-19 in people who have the first symptoms. In the USA, some tests have received authorization for diagnostic testing in symptomatic individuals, within 5-7 days from the onset of symptoms (3).

5. Risks and benefits:

   Three nasopharyngeal swabs and one blood sample will be obtained from each of the participants. Antigen tests, RT-PCR and serological and ancillary laboratory tests are performed in this study.

   Risks from nasopharyngeal swabs: The biggest risk is discomfort. Rarely - 1 in thousands - the person receiving the swab passes out from being super sensitive or gets a mild nosebleed.

   Risks from blood draw: The risks of venipuncture include being the most common reaction. Significant complications (defined as cellulitis, phlebitis, diaphoresis, hypotension, near syncope, syncope) are observed in Minor bruising at the site where the blood is taken and hematoma (12 % approximately), with minor bruising approximately 3.5% of patients. The most frequent single significant complication is hypotension at a frequency occurred of approximately 2.6%. Syncope is seen in less than 1% of patients. Other serious local reactions such as cellulitis or phlebitis are very rare (Galena HJ, J. Fam. Pract. 1992 May;34(5):582-4). Blood sampling is therefore conducted in each of the study sites under the surveillance of a board licensed physician.

   Benefits to public health: Point of care antigen testing is an integral component of the current national testing strategy serving for preventing of the spread of COVID 19 https://www.bundesgesundheitsministerium.de/fileadmin/Dateien/3_Downloads/C/C oronavirus/Nationale_Teststrategie_kurz_041220.pdf There is, however, significant uncertainty as to the reliability of antigen testing in comparison to the gold standard of testing, rt-PCR. To the authors ́ knowledge a prospective, sufficiently sizeable and challengeable evaluation of antigen testing under practice conditions has not been completed so far. The current study is intended to close this gap. Its results are urgently required and will have immediate impact on current recommendations for using antigen testing. In particular, it will demonstrate weaknesses and strengths of antigen testing and will allow to outweigh potential technical limitations of antigen testing compared to rt-PCR against the advantage of short-term availability of test results.

   Further, the thorough recording of the clinical health status and the basic laboratory analysis performed in this study, it will be able to get further insights into clinical predictors for the susceptibility for COVID 19.

   Benefits to the individual. Participants will benefit in two ways. Other than with rt-PCR, they will obtain the results of the antigen testing at once and on-site. In addition, offering two antigen tests simultaneously, the results of the point-of-care testing will be even more reliable than the result of a single test. Further, the participants are offered a free of charge basic laboratory health check including the following actionable health markers: basic blood cell count, C-reactive protein, HbA1c, cholesterol, triglycerides, LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, gamma-glutamyl-transferase, creatinine along with formula-derived creatinine, vitamin D.

   The investigators conclude that benefits of this study to the healthcare system which is faced with the life-threatening and to the individual study participants clearly outweigh the minor and manageable risks.

6. Population:

The investigators will include approximately 2000 consecutive male and female patients aged 18 years or above attending the Corona Test Center Stuttgart Cannstadter Wasen, in whom RT- PCR testing for SARS-CoV-2 is medically indicated or requested.

6.1 Inclusion Criteria:

Subjects eligible for inclusion in this study must meet the following criteria:

1. Signed informed consent must be obtained prior to study participation. The patient must be capable of understanding the nature, significance and implication of the trial.
2. Age 18 years or more

6.2 Exclusion criteria:

1. Lack of informed consent
2. Inability to understand the nature, significance and implication of the trial.
3. Severe clinical conditions requiring emergency hospitalization
4. Children and adolescents under the age of 18 years

7. Informed consent procedures Eligible subjects may only be included in the study after providing IRB/IEC-approved informed consent. Informed consent must be obtained before performing any study- specific procedures (Appendix 2).

8. Assessment schedule and assessments:

Informed Consent Form, Collection of demographic data and X relevant Medical History SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Antigen Test (Roche), PANBIO Covid-19 Ag Rapid Test (Abbott), RT-PCR Serological test (blood sample, 15,5 ml) Ancillary testing 8.1 Demographics, Medical history, sampling: Patient demographic data and other characteristic data to be collected on all patients include sex, age, weight, height, relevant medical history, vital signs and symptoms characteristic of COVID-19 including precise time specifications for onset of symptoms.

No information about medication will be collected. Three independent nasopharyngeal swabs will be obtained following standard procedures To avoid any bias due to the sequence of taking the nasopharyngeal swabs, the investigators will randomly allocate the patients to three sampling groups Group 1: RT-PCR - Antigen Test Roche - Antigen Test Abbott Group 2: Antigen Test Roche - Antigen Test Abbott - RT-PCR Group 3: Antigen Test Abbott - RT-PCR - Antigen Test Roche

The assignment of patients to each of these groups will be clearly specified on the case record forms. There will be two forms for each patient:

Form 1: Routine analysis request sheet as used by the collection point for patient identification which will be labelled with a bar code carrying the study number of a patient Form 2: Study specific form containing a copy of the bar code with the study number, initials of the patient and the year of birth.

8.2 SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Antigen Test (Roche): The SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Antigen Test is a rapid point of care chromatographic immunoassay for the qualitative detection of specific antigens of SARS-CoV-2 present in the human nasopharynx.

8.3 PANBIO Covid-19 Ag Rapid Test (Abbott): Panbio COVID-19 Ag Rapid Test Device is an in vitro diagnostic rapid test for the qualitative detection of SARS-CoV-2 antigen (Ag) in human nasopharyngeal swab specimens.

8.4 RT-PCR: RT-PCR evaluates the presence or absence of the SARS-CoV-2 genome in samples from nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal swabs and will be conducted according to the protocols established at the SYNLAB MVZ Leinfelden GmbH.

8.5 Serological and ancillary testing: Blood samples (10 ml heparin plasma and 5.5 ml EDTA plasma) will be collected to detect the presence of antibodies (specific immune response) against SARS-CoV-2 antigenic proteins (e.g. Roche, Abbott). Specifically, all participants will be offered to receive the results for the following analytes in acknowledgment of their participation in the study: blood cell count, C-reactive protein, HbA1c, cholesterol, triglycerides, LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, gamma-glutamyl-transferase, creatinine along with formula-derived creatinine, vitamin D. Backup samples will be collected to determine ancillary parameters like inflammatory markers, and micronutrients and vitamins.

9. Observation Period:

NIS schedule:

Start of the patient recruitment: February 1, 2021 End of the observation period: March 31, 2021 Final report: May 31, 2021

10.Data analysis and statistical methods: A database of the pseudonymized data and results will be generated. The investigators hypothesize that each of the antigen tests has a sensitivity and specificity of 1.0 in relation to RT-PCR which will be considered as the reference test. A p value of less than 0.05 will be required to consider each of the two rapid tests equivalent to RT-PCR.

With the aid of power calculations for chi-square tests for two degrees of freedom, required type I error probability equal to 0.05, required (1-type II error probability)equal to 0.8 and required effect size equal to 0.1 (small effect size in the sense of (4)) the investigators obtain a number of at least N=964 observations for consecutive testing of incoming patients in order to fulfill our requirements on significance and power to answer the first research question. Because of the expected number of around 10% positive out of 1000 cases, the assumption of a chi-square distribution is permissible.

The investigators will also address the question whether different pre-test probabilities will affect the sensitivity of the of the antigen tests. The investigators expect two major indication groups with different pre-test probabilities contributing approximately 90 percent of the rt-PCR positive samples: a) participants admitted for rt-PCR testing by a physician b) participants seeking for rt-PCR testing upon recommendation my health care authorities/contact persons. A total of approximately 200 rt-PCR samples will be required to detect a statistically significant difference between these two groups at a type 1 error of 0.05 and a statistical power of 0.80. To answer this second question, the investigators will extend the study to 2000 participants.

11. Ethics: The study protocol will be submitted to the Ethics Committee the Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg and the study will not begin until written permission is obtained. The study will be conducted in accordance with German law, EU Clinical Trial regulations and the Declaration of Helsinki on the ethical principles of clinical research.

11.1 Patient information and Informed Consent: The objective, nature and extent of the document must be explained in writing to every patient before he or she is included in the study (Appedix 1). The patient must not be included unless he or she has given written consent (Appendix 2). Patients will have the right to refuse to participate or to withdraw from the study for any reason and at any stage without affecting the quality or accessibility of their health care.

11.2 Data protection: The patient data collected for the study will be recorded in a pseudonymised form (Appendix 4), with a patient number that cannot be attributed to the identity of the patient. In the event of the study results being published, the personal data may only be used if the patient's anonymity is upheld. The patient's data is guaranteed to be always absolutely protected.

• Study Type: Observational
• Enrollment (Actual): 2222

Contacts and Locations

Study Locations

• Germany
  • Leinfelden-Echterdingen, Germany
    • SYNLAB MVZ Leinfelden-Echterdingen GmbH
  • Stuttgart, Germany
    • Corona Testzentrum Cannstatter Wasen

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No
• Genders Eligible for Study: All

• Sampling Method: Probability Sample

Study Population

We will include approximately 2000 consecutive male and female patients aged 18 years or above attending the Corona Test Center Stuttgart Cannstadter Wasen, in whom RT- PCR testing for SARS-CoV-2 is medically indicated or requested.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

1. Signed informed consent must be obtained prior to study participation. The patient must be capable of understanding the nature, significance and implication of the trial.
2. Age 18 years or more

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Lack of informed consent
2. Inability to understand the nature, significance and implication of the trial.
3. Severe clinical conditions requiring emergency hospitalization
4. Children and adolescents under the age of 18 years

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Observational Models: Other
• Time Perspectives: Other

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Time Frame
Sensitivity of the rapid antigen tests	31.03.2021

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: Synlab Holding Deutschland GmbH
• Investigators: Study Director: Winfried März, Prof. Dr. med, Synlab Holding Deutschland GmbH

Publications and helpful links

General Publications

• Stocking C, de Miguel L, Suteu G, Dressel A, Soricelli A, Roskos M, Valor S, Mutschmann C, Marz W. Evaluation of five widely used serologic assays for antibodies to SARS-CoV-2. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2022 Feb;102(2):115587. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2021.115587. Epub 2021 Oct 29.

Helpful Links

• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. New York: Routledge,

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start (Actual): February 1, 2021
• Primary Completion (Actual): March 31, 2021
• Study Completion (Actual): March 31, 2021

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: October 7, 2021
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: October 7, 2021
• First Posted (Actual): October 12, 2021

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Actual): October 20, 2021
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: October 12, 2021
• Last Verified: October 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Additional Relevant MeSH Terms: Coronavirus Infections; Coronaviridae Infections; Nidovirales Infections; RNA Virus Infections; Virus Diseases; Infections; Respiratory Tract Infections; Respiratory Tract Diseases; Pneumonia, Viral; Pneumonia; Lung Diseases; COVID-19
• Other Study ID Numbers: COVAG study protocol 2.0

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

• Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?: Yes

IPD Plan Description

Data will be made available to researchers upon request and formal agreement formal agreement to make sure that rules of good scientific practice are obeyed and that credit is given to the people who have been in charge of the design and the organization of the study. Interested researchers are invited to address their request or proposal to Prof. Dr. med. Winfried März (Winfried.Maerz@synlab.com).

Finally, the authors confirm that they accessed and validated these data and that all other researchers can access the data in the same manner the authors did.

• IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type: Study Protocol

Drug and device information, study documents

• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product: No
• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product: Yes