Learning Curve of Aortic Arch Replacement Surgery in Chinese Mainland With Stanford Type A Aortic Dissection

November 16, 2021 updated by: Yunlong Fan

Using CUSUM to Analyze the Learning Curve of Aortic Arch Replacement Surgery in Chinese Mainland With Stanford Type A Aortic Dissection

stanford type A aortic dissection is the most common cause of death caused by aortic disease in Chinese mainland. Patients who are hospitalized need immediate surgical treatment.Emergency aortic arch replacement is difficult and risky. Different surgical methods have different effects on postoperative prognosis. Aortic arch replacement is divided into total-arch replacement (Sun's operation) and hemi-arch replacement. In this study, and the learning Curve of Aortic Arch Replacement Surgery was evaluated with cumulative cum curve.

Study Overview

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

139

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Beijing, China
        • Chinese PLA General Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

age between 18 years and 65 years who underwent standford type A aorta dissection

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • age over 18 years who underwent surgery for stanford type A aorta dissection without concurrent cardiac Surgery

Exclusion Criteria:

  • data miss greater than 10%

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Other
  • Time Perspectives: Retrospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) time
Time Frame: Intra-operative
Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) time was used as the main variables for evaluation and visualization of the aorta dissection surgery learning curve using Cumulative sum.Cumulative sum (CUSUM) is a statistical method that focuses on results rather than on the process of performing a program skills, it generates graphs that allow for quick detection of deviations from pre-established standards and is an alternative tool that can be used to evaluate the performance of individual program. CUSUM can be generated based on set acceptable and unacceptable failure rates and the degree to which type 1(α) and type 2(β) errors (false positive and false negative errors) will be tolerated. CUSUM was defined as Sn = ∑(Xi -p0), where Xi = 0 for success and Xi = 1 for failure, p0 is the target reference.
Intra-operative
Aortic clamping (AC) time
Time Frame: Intra-operative
Aortic clamping (AC) time was used as the main variables for evaluation and visualization of the aorta dissection surgery learning curve using Cumulative sum.Cumulative sum (CUSUM) is a statistical method that focuses on results rather than on the process of performing a program skills, it generates graphs that allow for quick detection of deviations from pre-established standards and is an alternative tool that can be used to evaluate the performance of individual program. CUSUM can be generated based on set acceptable and unacceptable failure rates and the degree to which type 1(α) and type 2(β) errors (false positive and false negative errors) will be tolerated. CUSUM was defined as Sn = ∑(Xi -p0), where Xi = 0 for success and Xi = 1 for failure, p0 is the target reference.
Intra-operative

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 1, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 6, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 16, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

November 19, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 19, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 16, 2021

Last Verified

November 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • chinaPLAGH-66936549

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cumulative Sum Learning Curves

3
Subscribe