Efficacy and Safety of Topical Hydrocortisone on Signs and Symptoms of Dry Eye Associated to Meibomian Gland Dysfunction

March 12, 2024 updated by: Laboratorios Thea, Spain

Prospective Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of Topical Hydrocortisone Treatment on Clinical Signs and Symptoms of Dry Eye Disease Associated With Moderate Meibomian Gland Dysfunction

The purpose of this study is assess the efficacy and safety of topical hydrocortisone (Softacort) for treatment of clinical signs and symptoms of dry eye disease when associated with moderate meibomian gland dysfunction.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This is a prospective, interventional, randomized (1:1), single blind, of parallel groups and two treatment arms clinical trial (phase IV).

All patients diagnosed with dry eye disease (DED) associated with moderate MGD may participate in the study if they meet all the selection criteria.

Patients (or their representatives) will provide informed consent (IC) prior to the enrolment in the study and to the start of data collection. Patients must meet all the inclusion criteria and not meet any of the exclusion criteria.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

54

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Valencia, Spain, 46026
        • Recruiting
        • Hospital La Fe
        • Contact:
          • Ana Hervas, MD
          • Phone Number: +34 961244063
          • Email: fom@gva.es

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age ≥ 18 years
  2. Documented diagnosis of DE defined by TBUT value ≤ 5 seconds and Schirmer I test value < 10 mm/5 min
  3. Normal ophthalmic findings except dry eye disease and meibomian gland dysfunction
  4. OSDI score > 23 (moderate symptoms)
  5. Documented diagnosis of MGD grade 2 to 3
  6. Patient who can understand the instructions and adhere to medications
  7. Patient who receives complete information regarding the study objectives, authorize their participation in the study and sign an informed consent form before entering in the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Any contraindication or known allergies to Lephanet®, Thealoz Duo®, MGD Rx EyeBag® or Softacort®
  2. Ocular surgery in the past 6 months
  3. Ocular hypertension or glaucoma
  4. Cicatricial MGD
  5. Atopic condition including ocular allergy
  6. Suspect demodex lid infestation as evidenced by the presence of collarettes
  7. Intraocular inflammation
  8. Confirmed infection with COVID-19 in the last 3 months
  9. Systemic autoimmune disorder
  10. Use of contact lenses during the month prior to inclusion in the study or during the study
  11. Punctal occlusion
  12. Intraocular pressure > 22 mmHg
  13. Patient who has received topical or systemic anti-inflammatory treatments including corticosteroids and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDS) within 3 months prior to be included in the study or with a prescription for receiving topical / systemic anti-inflammatory treatments for the next 3 months
  14. In the investigator´s opinion, use of systemic medications that could affect the function of the meibomian gland and tear production within 3 months prior to be included in the study
  15. Any ocular or systemic disease known to affect the tear film other than MGD
  16. Patient with any situation or state that in the opinion of the investigator discourages their participation in the study
  17. Patient participating in any other interventional or non-interventional study or who have participated in another study within 30 days prior to inclusion in this study
  18. Women who are pregnant, planning to become pregnant or breastfeeding
  19. Patient who will not be able to complete the study (e.g., not willing to attend the follow-up visits, way of life interfering with compliance)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intervention group
Softacort® Lephanet® Thealoz Duo® MGD Rx EyeBag®
1 drop 4 times daily for 12 days, followed by twice daily for 2 days and stop, for a total of 14 days of treatment. Repeat on day 28: 1 drop 4 times daily for 12 days, followed by twice daily for 2 days and stop. Patients in the intervention arm will receive two 14-day cycles of hydrocortisone.
Other Names:
  • Softacort®
Eyelid warming device used once daily for 10 minutes followed by lid massage for 12 weeks by patients in both control and intervention arm.
Other Names:
  • Blepha EyeBag®
Lid hygiene with Lephanet® lid wipes used twice daily for 3 weeks followed by once daily for 9 more weeks by patients in both control and intervention arm.
Other Names:
  • Blephaclean®
Artificial tear supplementation with Thealoz Duo® 4 times daily for 12 weeks by patients in both control and intervention arm.
Other: Control group
Lephanet® Thealoz Duo® MGD Rx EyeBag®
Eyelid warming device used once daily for 10 minutes followed by lid massage for 12 weeks by patients in both control and intervention arm.
Other Names:
  • Blepha EyeBag®
Lid hygiene with Lephanet® lid wipes used twice daily for 3 weeks followed by once daily for 9 more weeks by patients in both control and intervention arm.
Other Names:
  • Blephaclean®
Artificial tear supplementation with Thealoz Duo® 4 times daily for 12 weeks by patients in both control and intervention arm.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Efficacy endpoint: Change from baseline in Meibomian Gland Dysfunction Dry Eye symptom score (MGD-DE) at 14 days
Time Frame: Day 0 and Day 14
Meibomian Gland Dysfunction Dry Eye symptom score (MGD-DE) calculated by the sum of the Visual Analogue scale (VAS) score assigned by the patient on a scale from 0 (no symptoms) to 100 (worst symptoms) in the following symptoms: itching, dry eye sensation, burning, foreign body sensation and ocular redness.
Day 0 and Day 14
Safety endpoint: Incidence of increased intraocular pressure and change from baseline at Day 0, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 84
Time Frame: Day 0, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 84
Mean of 3 measures of intraocular pressure measured with Goldmann tonometer in each eye on Day 0, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 84. Increased intraocular pressure defined as >21 mmHg.
Day 0, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 84

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from baseline in Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) questionnaire at Day 14, Day 28 and Day 84
Time Frame: Day 0, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 84.
12-item questionnaire related to vision-related function, ocular symptoms, and environmental triggers of dry eye. Response on a 0 to 4 scale that ranges from "none of the time" to "all of the time". The final score is calculated by multiplying the sum of all the scores by 25 and then dividing the total by the number of questions answered. Scores range from 0 to 100 with 0 to 12 representing normal, 13 to 22 mild DED, 23 to 32 moderate DED, and 33 severe DED
Day 0, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 84.
Change from baseline in Meibomian Gland Dysfunction Dry Eye symptom score at Day 14, Day 28 and Day 84
Time Frame: Day 0, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 84.
Meibomian Gland Dysfunction Dry Eye symptom score (MGD-DE) calculated by the sum of the VAS score assigned by the patient on a scale from 0 (no symptoms) to 100 (worst symptoms) in the following symptoms: itching, dry eye sensation, burning, foreign body sensation and ocular redness.
Day 0, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 84.
Change from baseline in ocular symptoms Visual Analogue scale (VAS) questionnaire at Day 14, Day 28 and Day 84
Time Frame: Day 0, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 84
VAS score assigned by the patient on a scale from 0 (no symptoms) to 100 (worst symptoms) in each of the following symptoms: itching, dry eye sensation, burning, foreign body sensation, ocular redness, ocular fatigue, and blurry vision.
Day 0, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 84
Change from baseline in hyperemia score (McMonnies-Chapman scale) at Day 14, Day 28 and Day 84.
Time Frame: Day 0, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 84
Inferior conjunctival hyperemia will be estimated by comparison with the photographic conjunctival hyperemia reference scale covering six grades, with highest grade as worst hyperemia.
Day 0, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 84
Change from baseline in Tear break up time (TBUT) at Day 14, Day 28 and Day 84
Time Frame: Day 0, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 84
Number of seconds that elapse between the last blink and the appearance of the first dry spot in the tear film observed with slit-lamp after instillation of fluorescein. A TBUT under 10 seconds is considered abnormal
Day 0, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 84
Change from baseline in corneal and conjunctival staining with fluorescein (Oxford grading scale) at Day 14, Day 28 and Day 84
Time Frame: Day 0, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 84
After instillation of fluorescein in conjunctival sac a comparison to the Oxford chart panels A to E, with E being the worst outcome.
Day 0, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 84
Change from baseline in corneal and conjunctival staining with lissamine green (Van Bijsterveld scale) at Day 14, Day 28 and Day 84
Time Frame: Day 0, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 84
Scoring system that divides the ocular surface into three zones: nasal bulbar conjunctiva, temporal bulbar conjunctiva, and cornea. Each zone is evaluated on a scale of 0 to 3, with 0 indicating no staining and 3 indicating confluent staining; the maximum possible worse outcome score with this system is 9.
Day 0, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 84
Change from baseline in meniscus height at Day 14, Day 28 and Day 84
Time Frame: Day 0, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 84
Measured with anterior segment optical coherence tomography. The lower the tear meniscus height the worst outcome.
Day 0, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 84
Change from baseline in Schirmer I test at Day 14, Day 28 and Day 84
Time Frame: Day 0, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 84
Folded edge Schirmer strip is placed over the rim of the lower eyelid and the eyes are then lightly closed. The amount of wetting after 5 minutes on the strip is measured in mm. Normal more than 10 mm / 5 min
Day 0, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 84
Change from baseline in MGD grading at Day 14, Day 28 and Day 84
Time Frame: Day 0, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 84
Grading of MGD: 0 to 4 where 0 is no meibomian gland dropout and expressed meibum with clear appearance and 4 is with gland dropout of more than half the lid margin or complete keratinization of the ducts and no expression of meibum. Higher grade is a worse outcome.
Day 0, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 84
Change from baseline in lid abnormalities at Day 14, Day 28 and Day 84
Time Frame: Day 0, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 84
Lid margin irregularity (presence or absence), thickness, and plugging of the meibomian orifices. A scale from 0 to 2, with 0 = no findings, 1 = mild findings, and 2 = severe findings.
Day 0, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 84
Change from baseline in Eyelid telangiectasia score at Day 14, Day 28 and Day 84
Time Frame: Day 0, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 84
Eyelid telangiectasia score from 0 to 3, where 0 is no findings and 3 is severe findings.
Day 0, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 84
Change from baseline in Lissamine green staining score at Day 14, Day 28 and Day 84
Time Frame: Day 0, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 84
Mean of longitudinal staining of upper lid margin after instilation with lissamine green graded from 0 to 3 and sagittal staining graded from 0 to 3 estimated by comparison with standard chart. Higher grade is a worse outcome.
Day 0, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 84
Change from baseline in Meibomian gland expressibility score at Day 14, Day 28 and Day 84
Time Frame: Day 0, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 84
Express each of 5 glands in temporal, central and lower lid and grade each gland on a scale from 0 to 3, with 3 = clear liquid secretion, 2 = cloudy liquid secretion, 1 = inspissated / toothpaste consistency, and 0 = no secretion. Total score range from 0 to 45. A lower grade is a worse outcome.
Day 0, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 84
Change from baseline in tear inflammatory cytokines at Day 14
Time Frame: Day 0 and Day 14.
Levels of 8 inflammatory cytokines in tears will be determined 2 micro liter samples taken from each eye.
Day 0 and Day 14.
Incidence of adverse events and serious adverse events occurred during the study.
Time Frame: Day 0, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 84
Report of any untoward medical occurrence in a patient during the study
Day 0, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 84
Change from baseline in ETDRS visual acuity at Day 14, Day 28 and Day 84
Time Frame: Day 0, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 84
Best corrected visual acuity in each eye measured with the ETDRS optotype.
Day 0, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 84

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ana Hervas Ontiveros, Dr, anheront@gmail.com

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 9, 2021

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 25, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 2, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

December 16, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 13, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 12, 2024

Last Verified

March 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Dry Eye

Clinical Trials on Hydrocortisone Ophthalmic

3
Subscribe