Rehabilitation for Survivors of Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest

May 11, 2023 updated by: Jan Christensen, Rigshospitalet, Denmark

The ROCK Trial. A Multidisciplinary Rehabilitation Intervention Targeted Return-to-work in Sudden Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest Survivors A Pragmatic Randomised Controlled Trial

This study is a parallel group multicentre investigator-initiated clinical randomised controlled superiority trial that will include a total of 214 survivors of OHCA.

Participants will to be randomized with a 1:1 allocation ratio to either a intervention consisting of a comprehensive initiated tailored rehabilitation intervention focusing on supporting RTW plus usual care compared to usual care alone.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The ROCK trial is a two-arm multicentre investigator-initiated clinical randomised controlled superiority trial evaluating the effectiveness of a comprehensive individually tailored rehabilitation intervention focusing on supporting labour marked participation of survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest compared to usual care, with primary endpoint measured after 12 months follow-up.

The overall aim of the ROCK trial is to evaluate the effectiveness of a comprehensive individually tailored multidisciplinary rehabilitation intervention for survivors of OHCA on RTW compared to usual care. The investigators hypothesize that the intervention will result in a higher-level labour marked attachment one year after hospital discharge in addition to increased health-related quality of life.

A full statistical analysis plan describing all details have been developed. In short, data from the national register on social transfer payments (DREAM database) will form the basis for the primary outcome. The primary outcome is labour market participation, defined as the proportion of employment vs. on social transfer payment, and the primary end point will be collected 12 months after hospital discharge.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

214

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Copenhagen, Denmark
        • Recruiting
        • Rigshospitalet
        • Contact:
          • Jan Christensen, Senior researcher

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion criteria:

  • All adult survivors with first time out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
  • Discharged from the Hospitals will be assessed eligible for inclusion

Exclusion criteria:

  • Survivors who prior to the cardiac arrest were not part of the labour force with at least two years until they are qualified to receive retirement state pensions
  • Patients that cannot understand and fulfil the study surveys (in Danish)
  • Patients with short witnessed cardiac arrests with return of spontaneous circulation estimated less than 4 minutes and immediate awakening without ICU treatment

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Individually tailored rehabilitation intervention + usual care
A comprehensive neurocognitive assessment and a thorough individual assessment of rehabilitation needs will be conducted to inform the individually tailored intervention plan. Core intervention elements are: 1) comprehensive assessment of individual rehabilitation needs including neuropsychology tests in order to make a individually tailored intervention plan coordinated with the multidisciplinary rehabilitation team, 2) providing strategies to lessen impact for the individual cognitive impairment, 3) educating survivors and relatives about the impact of a cardiac arrest and consequences on daily life, 4) work preparation, including establishment of routines and opportunities to practice work skills and 5) collaboration with the local municipality's job centre and employers to plan, support and monitor graded RTW, 6) short term therapy by psychologist dealing with thoughts and behaviour in relation to cardiac arrest.
Individually tailored rehabilitation intervention
Active Comparator: Usual care
All participants including those allocated to the usual care group will be seen by an occupational therapist if their MoCA screening score ≤26. Furthermore, if considered relevant by the discharging unit, survivors are referred for rehabilitation provided and delivered in the local municipality where the participant is resident. The content of the rehabilitation will typically be based on the content of the rehabilitation plan from the discharging hospital unit and an individual assessment of the survivors' expressed needs, within the local municipality where the participant is resident.
Usual care

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Labour market participation using data from the DREAM database
Time Frame: 12-months after hospital discharge
The primary outcome of the clinical trial is labour market participation, defined as a dichotomized outcome, employment vs. on social transfer payment 12 months after hospital discharge.
12-months after hospital discharge

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Return-to-work - Multi-state models of patients change in states from baseline to 12-months after hospital discharge
Time Frame: 12-months after hospital discharge
3 multi-state models (working full-time, Working part-time, sick leave and the absorbing stated retired). Patients are not very likely to die during follow-up; this state may be superfluous. In the model working hours and retirement to private pensions will need to be assessed using self-reported data.
12-months after hospital discharge
PRO: Readiness for return-to-work (RRTW)
Time Frame: 2 weeks, 12 weeks, 26 weeks and 52 weeks after hospital discharge
Readiness for return-to-work (RRTW) consisting of 22 items.
2 weeks, 12 weeks, 26 weeks and 52 weeks after hospital discharge
PRO: Degree of return-to-work
Time Frame: 2 weeks, 12 weeks, 26 weeks and 52 weeks after hospital discharge
Single items covering degree of RTW in hours weekly (compared to prior to the cardiac arrest), job describtion (changed Y/N) and job modification (changes Y/N).
2 weeks, 12 weeks, 26 weeks and 52 weeks after hospital discharge
PROM: EQ-5D-5L
Time Frame: Baseline (Hospital discharge), 2 weeks, 12 weeks, 26 weeks and 52 weeks after hospital discharge

The descriptive system comprises five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems. The patient is asked to indicate his/her health state by ticking the box next to the most appropriate statement in each of the five dimensions. This decision results in a 1-digit number that expresses the level selected for that dimension. The digits for the five dimensions can be combined into a 5-digit number that describes the patient's health state.

The EQ VAS records the patient's self-rated health on a vertical visual analogue scale, where the endpoints are labelled 'The best health you can imagine' and 'The worst health you can imagine'. The VAS can be used as a quantitative measure of health outcome that reflect the patient's own judgement.

Baseline (Hospital discharge), 2 weeks, 12 weeks, 26 weeks and 52 weeks after hospital discharge
PROM: Multidimensional fatigue inventory (MFI-20)
Time Frame: Baseline (Hospital discharge), 2 weeks, 12 weeks, 26 weeks and 52 weeks after hospital discharge
The MFI is a 20-item self-report instrument designed to measure fatigue. It covers the following dimensions: general fatigue, physical fatigue, reduced activity, reduced motivation and mental fatigue.
Baseline (Hospital discharge), 2 weeks, 12 weeks, 26 weeks and 52 weeks after hospital discharge
PROM: The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)
Time Frame: Baseline (Hospital discharge), 2 weeks, 12 weeks, 26 weeks and 52 weeks after hospital discharge
The questionnaire comprises seven questions for anxiety and seven questions for depression
Baseline (Hospital discharge), 2 weeks, 12 weeks, 26 weeks and 52 weeks after hospital discharge
PROM: The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)
Time Frame: Baseline (Hospital discharge), 2 weeks, 12 weeks, 26 weeks and 52 weeks after hospital discharge
The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) is a self-report questionnaire that assesses sleep quality over a 1-month time interval. The measure consists of 19 individual items, creating 7 components that produce one global score
Baseline (Hospital discharge), 2 weeks, 12 weeks, 26 weeks and 52 weeks after hospital discharge
The Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ)
Time Frame: 2 weeks, 26 weeks and 52 weeks after hospital discharge
HLQ has nine scales that each measure an aspect of the multidimensional construct of health literacy.
2 weeks, 26 weeks and 52 weeks after hospital discharge
PROM: Disease specific health-related quality of life (HeartQoL)
Time Frame: 2 weeks, 12 weeks, 26 weeks and 52 weeks after hospital discharge
The HeartQoL questionnaire comprises 14-items forming a physical, emotional subscales and a global score,
2 weeks, 12 weeks, 26 weeks and 52 weeks after hospital discharge
The Impact of Event Scale - Revised (IES-R)
Time Frame: 12 weeks, 26 weeks and 52 weeks after hospital discharge
The Impact of Event Scale - Revised (IES-R) measures syptoms related to post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) The IES-R has 22 questions, that comprises a total subjective stress scale and three subscales (Intrusion, Avoidance, Hyperarousal)
12 weeks, 26 weeks and 52 weeks after hospital discharge

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Montreal Cogntive Assessment (MoCA)
Time Frame: Baseline (Hospital discharge)
The MoCA is a cognitive screening test designed to assist Health Professionals in the detection of mild cognitive impairment
Baseline (Hospital discharge)
Assessment of Motor and Process Skills (AMPS)
Time Frame: Baseline (Hospital discharge)
Measures the quality of a person's ADL task performance
Baseline (Hospital discharge)
Neurocognitive testing: Trail Making Test (TMT) Parts A and B
Time Frame: 1 month after hospital discharge
the ability to think, reason, and remember
1 month after hospital discharge
Neurocognitive testing: The Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale
Time Frame: 1 month after hospital discharge
WAIS-IV
1 month after hospital discharge
Neurocognitive testing: The Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status
Time Frame: 1 month after hospital discharge
RBANS
1 month after hospital discharge
Neurocognitive testing: Rey Complex Figure Test
Time Frame: 1 month after hospital discharge
is a neuropsychological assessment in which examinees are asked to reproduce a complicated line drawing
1 month after hospital discharge
Neurocognitive testing: The Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT)
Time Frame: 1 month after hospital discharge
A screening instrument to assess neurological dysfunction
1 month after hospital discharge
Neurocognitive testing: The Five-Point Test
Time Frame: 1 month after hospital discharge
The Five-Point Test is a test for measuring figural fluency functions
1 month after hospital discharge
Neurocognitive testing: The Kohs Block test
Time Frame: 1 month after hospital discharge
a performance test designed to be an IQ test
1 month after hospital discharge
Neurocognitive testing: Animal fluency
Time Frame: 1 month after hospital discharge
Verbal fluency tests are a kind of psychological test in which participants have to produce as many words as possible from a category in a given time
1 month after hospital discharge
Neurocognitive testing: Fluency S-words
Time Frame: 1 month after hospital discharge
Verbal fluency tests are a kind of psychological test in which participants have to produce as many words as possible from a category in a given time
1 month after hospital discharge

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jan Christensen, PhD, Department of Occupational Therapy and Physiotherapy, Rigshospitalet, Denmark

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2024

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 27, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 29, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

December 30, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 12, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 11, 2023

Last Verified

May 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

By contacting the corresponding author and upon reasonable request, de-identified data can be made available for individual participant data meta-analysis.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

After publication of all studies explicit stated in the Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP)

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

By contacting the corresponding author and upon reasonable request, de-identified data can be made available for individual participant data meta-analysis.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Heart Arrest

Clinical Trials on Usual care

3
Subscribe