- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05175196
CandyCollect Strep Throat Testing
Microengineered Lollipop for Patient-Centric Saliva Collection
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
The rationale for this study is to demonstrate the potential of the CandyCollect platform for acquisition of samples from children in the clinic. With deliberate design to maximize collection performance from saliva sampling, the investigators long-term vision is that the CandyCollect platform will achieve better sensitivity and specificity than can be obtained with current biospecimen collection techniques, while providing a platform that is preferred by patients and usable in home settings. Ultimately, the CandyCollect has the potential to make saliva sampling a new gold standard for respiratory disease diagnostics and prevent the discomfort associated with a pharyngeal swab.
The Theberge Lab at the University of Washington that is developing CandyCollect is using data collected throughout the study to iterate the engineering of the device. As such, analyses were performed after Cohort 1 (n=30 dyad completers), and in line with the iterative nature of this study, the study team adjusted the study design to further inform the engineering of the device. For Cohort 2, which will also target n=30 dyad completers, the study team will still administer surveys to the child and caregiver and collect 4 saliva samples from each child.
Intervention:
- Cohort 1: Pediatric participants diagnosed with GAS via rapid antigen detection test (RADT) will be asked to suck on a swab for 10 seconds, like sucking on a lollipop. They will then be asked to suck on a candy lollipop that will collect their saliva. Participants will do each type of saliva collection twice-two swabs, then two lollipops. Afterwards, participants (both pediatric and caregiver) will fill out a short survey asking about their feelings and opinions about the different types of tests.
- Cohort 2: Pediatric participants diagnosed with GAS via rapid antigen detection test (RADT) will be asked to suck on four CandyCollect devices. The CandyCollect devices will be designed such that one will take 10 seconds to obtain, one will take 30 seconds to obtain; and two will each take 1 minute to obtain; participants will be instructed to suck on the CandyCollect device for these durations. Afterwards, participants (both pediatric and caregiver) will fill out a short survey asking about their feelings and opinions about the different types of tests.
Specific aims:
- Aim 1: The primary aim of this study is to assess the efficacy of the CandyCollect platform to capture and detect GAS in a small scale clinical study. The investigators will compare results of the CandyCollect sampling with both the RADT, which is the current gold standard, as well as a lollipop swab.
- Aim 2: The secondary aim of this study is to evaluate the usability of the CandyCollect device by surveying pediatric participant and parent experience, acceptance of the collection technique, and their willingness to perform the test at home.
Hypotheses to be tested:
- Aim 1: The CandyCollect platform is non-inferior to gold-standard RADT for GAS.
- Aim 2: Pediatric participants and their parent/legal guardians will have a more positive experience with the CandyCollect than the RADT throat swab or the lollipop swab, and they will be willing to do the CandyCollect at home.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Elena Alfaro
- Phone Number: (608) 890-0584
- Email: elalfaro@wisc.edu
Study Locations
-
-
Wisconsin
-
Madison, Wisconsin, United States, 53792
- Recruiting
- University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Child age 5-17 years old
- Diagnosis of acute pharyngitis caused by GAS
- A positive RADT swab in clinic
- Able to assent and complete surveys in English
Exclusion Criteria:
- Unable to suck on a swab or CandyCollect
- Previous participation in this study
- Self-reported sensitivity to sugar-free products
Inclusion for Caregiver Participants:
- Parent or legal guardian able to provide consent for child participant
- Physically present at the clinic with the child
- Able consent and complete surveys in English
Exclusion for Caregiver Participants:
- Does not meet inclusion criteria
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Pediatric Participants with GAS
Children age 5-17 years old diagnosed via standard Rapid Antigen Detection Test with acute pharyngitis caused by Group A Streptococcus (GAS), along with their parent or legal guardian (aka "caregiver").
|
The "lollipop" swab is a typical swab that would be used to obtain routine pharyngeal samples.
Child participants are instructed to suck on the swab for 10 seconds, as they would suck on a lollipop.
Participant will be asked to take this test twice.
The CandyCollect device is a novel, micro-engineered, lollipop-inspired platform.
It has functionalized open microchannels for pathogen capture and concentration.
It also has time-controlled flavoring release to make the platform more patient-centric.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Number of test results positive for GAS
Time Frame: day 1 (up to 40 minutes)
|
The primary aim of this study is to assess the efficacy of the CandyCollect platform to capture and detect Group A Streptococcus (GAS) in a small scale clinical study.
The investigators will compare results of the CandyCollect sampling and a lollipop swab test to the rapid antigen detection test (RADT).
|
day 1 (up to 40 minutes)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Caregiver Sample Collection Preference
Time Frame: day 1 (up to 40 minutes)
|
The acceptance of the CandyCollect device relative to other sample collection methods will be measured by surveying preferred sample collection method for their child if they needed another test next week, which method they preferred, which method was most suitable for children in general, and which method was least invasive.
Count of Caregivers for each question for each sample collection method will be reported.
|
day 1 (up to 40 minutes)
|
Number of Caregivers Willing to Have Their Child Perform the CandyCollect at Home
Time Frame: day 1 (up to 40 minutes)
|
Acceptability of the CandyCollect device will be in part measured by Caregiver willingness to perform the test at home.
|
day 1 (up to 40 minutes)
|
Pediatric Participant Wong-Baker FACES Pain Score for Each Sample Collection Method
Time Frame: day 1 (up to 40 minutes)
|
Pediatric participants will be surveyed with the Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale for their experience with the throat swab, lollipop swab, and CandyCollect.
Scores range from 1-10, where higher scores indicate increased pain.
|
day 1 (up to 40 minutes)
|
Pediatric Participant Sample Collection Preference
Time Frame: day 1 (up to 40 minutes)
|
Pediatric participants will be asked with sample collection method they prefer: throat swab, lollipop swab, or CandyCollect.
|
day 1 (up to 40 minutes)
|
Number of Pediatric Participants Willing to do the CandyCollect at Home
Time Frame: day 1 (up to 40 minutes)
|
Acceptability of the intervention will be in part measured by asking pediatric participants if they are willing to do the CandyCollect at home.
|
day 1 (up to 40 minutes)
|
Caregiver Experience Score (Bad/Good)
Time Frame: day 1 (up to 40 minutes)
|
The secondary aim of this study is to evaluate the usability of the CandyCollect device by surveying participant experience with the throat swab, lollipop swab, and CandyCollect.
Caregivers will be asked to rate their experiences on a scale of -5 (bad) to 5 (good).
Mean scores for each feeling for each test will be reported.
|
day 1 (up to 40 minutes)
|
Caregiver Experience Score (Pleasant/Unpleasant)
Time Frame: day 1 (up to 40 minutes)
|
The secondary aim of this study is to evaluate the usability of the CandyCollect device by surveying participant experience with the throat swab, lollipop swab, and CandyCollect.
Caregivers will be asked to rate their experiences on a scale of 1 (pleasant) to 7 (unpleasant).
Mean scores for each feeling for each test will be reported.
|
day 1 (up to 40 minutes)
|
Pediatric Participant Yummy / Yucky Score for Each Sample Collection Method
Time Frame: day 1 (up to 40 minutes)
|
Pediatric participants will be surveyed with Yummy to Yucky Scale for their experience with the throat swab, lollipop swab, and CandyCollect.
Scores range from 1-5, where higher scores indicate worse experience.
|
day 1 (up to 40 minutes)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Gregory DeMuri, MD, University of Wisconsin, Madison
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2021-1427
- A536756 (Other Identifier: UW Madison)
- R21 Pending (Other Identifier: NIH)
- SMPH\PEDIATRICS\INFECT DIS (Other Identifier: UW Madison)
- Protocol Version 11/1/2023 (Other Identifier: UW Madison)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Group A Streptococcal Infection
-
University of OxfordImperial College London; Public Health EnglandUnknownInvasive Streptococcal Infection | Invasive Group A Streptococcal Disease | Invasive Group B Streptococcal Disease | Necrotising FasciitisUnited Kingdom
-
Noordwest ZiekenhuisgroepKarolinska Institutet; Medical University of Graz; Fondazione Policlinico Universitario... and other collaboratorsRecruitingInvasive Group A Beta-Haemolytic Streptococcal DiseaseNetherlands
-
Tampere University HospitalTurku University Hospital; University of TurkuActive, not recruitingInvasive Group A Beta-Haemolytic Streptococcal DiseaseFinland
-
Association Clinique Thérapeutique Infantile du...RecruitingRisk Factors | Outcome, Fatal | Therapy | Severe Infection | Strain | Virulence Factors | Medical Care | Sepsis Due to Streptococcus, Group A | Medical ComplicationsFrance
-
University of AlbertaGriffith UniversityRecruitingGroup A Streptococcal InfectionCanada
-
Hadassah Medical OrganizationCompletedStreptococcal InfectionsIsrael
-
St George's, University of LondonAssistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris; MRC/UVRI and LSHTM Uganda Research... and other collaboratorsRecruitingGroup B Streptococcus Carrier in Childbirth | Group B Streptococcal Infection, Late-Onset | Group B Streptococcal Infection, Early-Onset | Group B Streptococcus Neonatal Sepsis | Group B Strep InfectionFrance, Italy, Malawi, Netherlands, Uganda, United Kingdom
-
St George's, University of LondonMRC/UVRI and LSHTM Uganda Research Unit; MU-JHU CARECompletedGroup B Streptococcus Carrier in Childbirth | Group B Streptococcal Infection, Late-Onset | Group B Streptococcal Infection, Early-Onset | Group B Streptococcus Neonatal Sepsis | Group B Strep InfectionUganda
-
St George's, University of LondonMRC/UVRI and LSHTM Uganda Research Unit; MU-JHU CAREUnknownGroup B Streptococcus Carrier in Childbirth | Group B Streptococcal Infection, Late-Onset | Group B Streptococcal Infection, Early-Onset | Group B Streptococcus Neonatal Sepsis | Group B Strep InfectionUganda
-
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisNot yet recruitingInvasive Group A Beta-Haemolytic Streptococcal DiseaseFrance
Clinical Trials on Lollipop Swab
-
University of Wisconsin, MadisonCompleted
-
University of Wisconsin, MadisonWithdrawn
-
Datar Cancer Genetics LimitedNational University of Singapore; Test At Home Pte. LtdNot yet recruiting
-
University of Wisconsin, MadisonCompleted
-
Air Force Military Medical University, ChinaCompleted
-
Air Force Military Medical University, ChinaCompleted
-
The University of Hong KongKK Women's and Children's HospitalNot yet recruitingIleus Postoperative
-
Dana-Farber Cancer InstituteTHOR Photomedicine LtdRecruitingOral Mucositis | Myeloablative Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation | Intraoral Photobiomodulation Therapy | Mucosal UlcerUnited States
-
Sahlgrenska University Hospital, SwedenCompleted
-
University of Electronic Science and Technology...Recruiting