Understanding Components of Mind-body Exercise for Physical Activity Engagement in Metabolic Syndrome

February 29, 2024 updated by: Kristen Kraemer, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
The aim of this study is to assess the feasibility and acceptability (e.g., enrollment, adherence, retention, acceptability of procedures and interventions) of a pilot factorial study design that will help elucidate components of mind-body exercise interventions. The study involves completing a walking program, a mindful attention program, a walking program that includes mindful attention, or no program at all. A "pilot" study is a smaller study that helps researchers to understand whether the study design can be carried out and what participants think about the study.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02215
        • Recruiting
        • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Kristen M Kraemer, PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Metabolic syndrome, defined as meeting 3 or more of the following criteria in the last 12 months at the time of medical record review: (a) BMI ≥ 25; (b) fasting glucose ≥ 100 [5.6 mmol/L] or A1C ≥ 5.7 or medications; (c) blood pressure ≥ 130 systolic or ≥ 85 diastolic or medications; (d) triglycerides ≥ 150 or 1.7 mmol/L or medications; (e) or HDL < 40mg/ dL for men and 50mg/dL for women or medications;
  • insufficiently active, defined as a score ≤ 23 (moderate-to-strenuous units) on Godin-Shepard Leisure-Time Physical Activity Questionnaire;
  • age 18-70 years;
  • given medical clearance for moderate-intensity exercise and exercise stress testing by their primary care physician (PCP);
  • access to a device with internet and videoconferencing capabilities

Exclusion Criteria:

  • current diagnosis of any of the following: (a) coronary artery disease or other chronic heart diseases (e.g., heart failure) in which exercise would be contraindicated or that would preclude HRV analyses (e.g., some arrhythmias); (b) any diabetes; (c) chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or other severe lung dysfunction (e.g., severe asthma); (d) severe cognitive impairment
  • >2 self-reported classes or self-guided mindfulness or mindful movement sessions per week in past 3 months
  • self-reported inability to speak and read in English
  • current beta blocker or calcium channel blocker medication
  • uncontrolled hypertension, defined as resting blood pressure ≥ 150 systolic or ≥ 90 diastolic in the last 6 months
  • self- or physician-reported contraindications for exercise (e.g., severe balance impairment, musculoskeletal restrictions)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Factorial Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Mindful attention
16 sessions over 8 weeks (2x/week) of mindful attention audio recordings delivered via headphones
Participants will listen to mindful attention audio recordings via headphones
Experimental: Exercise
16 sessions over 8 weeks (2x/week) of moderate-intensity treadmill walking
Participants will complete a moderate-intensity walking program
Experimental: Exercise with mindful attention
16 sessions over 8 weeks (2x/week) of moderate-intensity treadmill walking utilizing mindful attention audio recordings delivered via headphones
Participants will complete a moderate-intensity walking program while listening to mindful attention audio recordings via headphones
No Intervention: No intervention
No intervention sessions

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Feasibility of screening: screened to eligible ratio
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
percent of screened individuals that were determined eligible for the study
Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Feasibility of enrollment: eligible to enrollment ratio
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
percent of eligible individuals that enroll in the study; determined to be feasible if greater than or equal to 70% of eligible patients enroll
Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Feasibility of retention: retention at each assessment
Time Frame: 6 months
percent of enrolled participants retained at post-intervention and 3-month follow-up; determined to be feasible if greater than or equal to 70% retention at each assessment
6 months
Feasibility of interventions: attendance rates for each session
Time Frame: 6 months
percent session attendance; determined to be feasible if participants attend greater than or equal to 75% of sessions
6 months
Feasibility of survey completion: survey completion rates at each assessment
Time Frame: 6 months
percent of participants that complete surveys at post-intervention and 3-month follow-up
6 months
Acceptability of interventions
Time Frame: 6 months
Acceptability of the interventions will be assessed via overall satisfaction (1 = not at all to 10 = very much); determined to be acceptable if mean rating is greater than or equal to 7.5 across 80% of sessions
6 months
Acceptability of study design
Time Frame: 6 months
Acceptability of the study design will be assessed via acceptability of study procedures (1= not at all to 10 = very much); determined to be acceptable if mean rating is greater than or equal to 7.5 across 80% of sessions
6 months
Perspectives on study interventions
Time Frame: Post-intervention (after 8 week intervention)
Perspectives on study interventions will be assessed via exit interview
Post-intervention (after 8 week intervention)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Ventilatory efficiency
Time Frame: Baseline (week 0), post-intervention (after 8 week intervention)
Assessed via a maximal cardiopulmonary exercise test, using expired gas analysis under continuous electrocardiographic monitoring.
Baseline (week 0), post-intervention (after 8 week intervention)
Heart rate dynamics
Time Frame: Baseline (week 0), post-intervention (after 8 week intervention)
Assessed via 24-hour heart rate monitoring
Baseline (week 0), post-intervention (after 8 week intervention)
Positive affect
Time Frame: Baseline (week 0), post-intervention (after 8 week intervention), 3 months post-intervention
Positive and Negative Affect Schedule, a validated self-report measure, used to assess levels of positive affect. The positive affect subscale is made up of 10 items rated on a 5-point Likert scale. Scores range from 10 to 50 with higher scores indicating greater levels of positive affect
Baseline (week 0), post-intervention (after 8 week intervention), 3 months post-intervention
Emotion regulation
Time Frame: Baseline (week 0), post-intervention (after 8 week intervention), 3 months post-intervention
Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale, a 36-item validated self-report measure, used to assess difficulties with emotion regulation; items are rated on a 5-point Likert scale, total scores range from 36 to 180, with higher scores reflecting greater emotion regulation difficulties. 6 subscale scores with higher scores reflecting greater emotion regulation difficulties.
Baseline (week 0), post-intervention (after 8 week intervention), 3 months post-intervention
Interoceptive awareness
Time Frame: Baseline (week 0), post-intervention (after 8 week intervention), 3 months post-intervention
Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness Scale, a 32-item validated self-report measures, used to assess levels of interoceptive awareness; items are rated on a 6-point Likert scale, total scores range from 0 to 160, with higher scores reflecting greater interoceptive awareness. 8 subscales with higher scores reflecting greater interocpetive awareness
Baseline (week 0), post-intervention (after 8 week intervention), 3 months post-intervention
Self-efficacy
Time Frame: Baseline (week 0), post-intervention (after 8 week intervention), 3 months post-intervention
Multidimensional Self-Efficacy Scale, a 9-item validated self-report measure, used to assess levels of self-efficacy; scores range from 0-90 with higher scores reflecting greater self-efficacy
Baseline (week 0), post-intervention (after 8 week intervention), 3 months post-intervention
Self-reported physical activity
Time Frame: Baseline (week 0), post-intervention (after 8 week intervention), 3 months post-intervention
International Physical Activity Questionnaire, a validated self-report measure, used to assess levels of physical activity; walking MET mins/week, moderate MET mins/week and vigorous MET mins/week are calculated
Baseline (week 0), post-intervention (after 8 week intervention), 3 months post-intervention
Objective physical activity
Time Frame: Baseline (week 0), post-intervention (after 8 week intervention)
7 day activity monitoring (via ActiGraph monitor) to assess minutes per week in moderate-intensity exercise
Baseline (week 0), post-intervention (after 8 week intervention)
In-session oxygen consumption
Time Frame: Weeks 1 and 8
Submaximal cardiopulmonary exercise testing (via standard metabolic cart)
Weeks 1 and 8
In-session ventilatory efficiency
Time Frame: Weeks 1 and 8
Submaximal cardiopulmonary exercise testing (via standard metabolic cart)
Weeks 1 and 8
In-session respiration rate
Time Frame: Weeks 1 and 8
Submaximal cardiopulmonary exercise testing (via standard metabolic cart)
Weeks 1 and 8
In-session heart rate
Time Frame: Weeks 1 and 8
Submaximal cardiopulmonary exercise testing (via standard metabolic cart)
Weeks 1 and 8

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 31, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

April 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 27, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 7, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

February 16, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

March 1, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 29, 2024

Last Verified

February 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Metabolic Syndrome

Clinical Trials on Mindful attention

3
Subscribe