Developing and Testing an Online Pathway From Screening to Treatment for Depression in Oncology: iPath*D (Aim 2) (iPath Pilot)

March 19, 2024 updated by: Paul J. Barr, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center
The purpose of this study is to determine the extent to which an online pathway to depression treatment (iPath*D) is acceptable and usable to patients receiving cancer treatment who report symptoms of depression.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The investigators will determine the extent to which an online pathway to depression treatment (iPath*D) is acceptable and usable to patients receiving cancer treatment who report symptoms of depression. iPath*D will be designed to increase screening, mental health literacy, and treatment access. Patients will access their iPath*D account online to review their PHQ-9 score and its interpretation, followed by an interactive depression decision aid comparing information on a range of online and in-person treatment options. Upon review of the decision aid, participants will be able to directly connect to a treatment path via embedded hyperlinks in the decision aid.

The investigators will determine the usability, acceptability, and feasibility of iPath*D. The investigators will explore the hypothesis that iPath*D will be highly usable, acceptable to patients, feasible to implement, and will result in improved mental health literacy, and greater treatment access. The tool for the study was developed during a preliminary portion (Aim 1) of the project, under D-H IRB number STUDY02001240 .

This approach uses an open-label, single arm pilot, with adult patients receiving treatment for cancer in a rural cancer clinic, St Johnsbury, VT (Dartmouth Cancer Center North) (n=30) with moderate-severe depression, Aim 2 of the project.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion criteria

  1. Adults (≥18 years)
  2. New patients who are beginning treatment at Dartmouth Cancer Center North and returning for their chemo teach or radiation simulation visit
  3. Can communicate in English
  4. PHQ-9 ≥10 and ≤27

Exclusion criteria

  1. Mild Depression (PHQ-9 ≥10)
  2. Individuals who screen positive for suicidal ideation with method, intent, plan or a recent prior suicide/self-harm attempt, as determined by a positive endorsement of items 3, 4, 5 or 6 on the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSR).
  3. Individuals with bipolar disorder or psychosis (documented in the EMR)
  4. Individuals currently receiving treatment for a mental health condition (documented in the EMR or self-reported during eligibility screening)
  5. Significant cognitive impairment (Callahan's Six Item Screener of cognitive function ≤ 4; Self-reported during eligibility screening)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: iPath*D
An online platform that connects patients screening positive for clinically significant depression in cancer settings to a range of online and inperson evidence-based treatments, facilitated by an interactive DA.
Online pathway from screening to treatment for depression in cancer patients.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
System usability
Time Frame: 2 weeks
System Usability Scale (10 items; mean ≥68/100),
2 weeks
Acceptability of intervention
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Acceptability of Intervention Measure (4 items), mean ≥4/5
2 weeks
Feasibility of intervention
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Feasibility of Intervention Measure (4 items), mean ≥4/5
2 weeks
Change in number of patients selecting a treatment path to access
Time Frame: 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 6 weeks
Click on link to access online treatment service | indicate in self-report survey accessing local resources
2 weeks, 4 weeks, 6 weeks
Change in Mental Health Literacy (MHL)
Time Frame: Baseline, 2 weeks
A modified 10-item version for the validated multiple choice questionnaire (MCQ) for depression assesses treatment knowledge, understanding & beliefs. Higher scores indicate higher MHL.
Baseline, 2 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in PHQ-9 completion (exploratory outcome)
Time Frame: Baseline, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 6 weeks
Number of patients who complete Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), a validated nine item depression scale. A score total of 0-4 points equals "normal" or minimal depression. Scoring between 5-9 points indicates mild depression, 10-14 points indicates moderate depression, 15-19 points indicates moderately severe depression, and 20 or more points indicates severe depression.
Baseline, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 6 weeks
Change in treatment initiation (exploratory outcome)
Time Frame: 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 6 weeks
Proportion of patients who self-report treatment initiation e.g., fill antidepressant prescription, visited with psychiatrist for talk therapy, began a cCBT program, or other service
2 weeks, 4 weeks, 6 weeks
Change in treatment adherence (exploratory outcome)
Time Frame: 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 6 weeks
Proportion of patients who self-report continued adherence to treatment e.g., antidepressant refill (yes/no), number of talk therapy sessions completed, or Computerised Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (cCBT) modules completed
2 weeks, 4 weeks, 6 weeks
Decisional regret (exploratory outcome)
Time Frame: 6 weeks
The Decisional Regret Scale assesses satisfaction with a healthcare decision (5-items, scores range from 0-100, with higher scores indicating high regret)
6 weeks
Change in PHQ-9 score (exploratory outcome)
Time Frame: Baseline, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 6 weeks
Response; 5-point reduction in baseline PHQ-9 score. Remission; PHQ-9 score of <5 points
Baseline, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 6 weeks
Change in quality of life (exploratory outcome)
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 weeks
Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) scale (27-items, scores range from 0-108 with higher scores indicating higher quality of life)
Baseline, 6 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Paul Barr, Ph.D., Dartmouth College

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

March 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

August 1, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

August 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 21, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 21, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

March 31, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 20, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 19, 2024

Last Verified

March 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • STUDY02002016
  • R21CA249767 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

At the conclusion of this study, the investigators plan to make available, upon request, a public use file of all participant-level study data. Investigators will use appropriate de-identification and security measures. Plain-language descriptions of data sharing plans will be included in informed consents.

Dartmouth College will retain ownership and all rights to all intellectual property and will provide public access to data. Appropriate documentation will also be provided regarding information about the methodology and procedures used to collect the data, details about codes and definitions of variables.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

At the time of publication or at the end of the grant period, whichever comes first.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

De-identified data will be available upon request from the PI to qualified investigators, with appropriate IRB approval, and for research purposes only.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Depression

Clinical Trials on iPath*D

3
Subscribe