Comparison Between [11C]UCB-J and [18F]SynVest-1 PET in HD.

July 25, 2025 updated by: Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven

Direct Quantitative Comparison Between [11C]UCB-J and [18F]SynVest-1 PET as Markers for Synaptic Density in Huntington's Disease.

Positron Emission Tomography (PET) is a functional imaging technique, which enables in vivo visualization of biological molecules expressed in human tissues. Brain PET is most powerful to study a vast range of neurological and psychiatric disorders in vivo, targeting neuronal and glial activity, metabolism, cerebral blood flow, receptor proteins or misfolded proteins.

In vivo imaging of synaptic density in the human brain has become feasible through development of [11C]UCB-J, a PET radioligand for the synaptic vesicle protein SV2A, which is ubiquitously and homogeneously present in presynaptic terminals throughout the brain. A first study in Huntington's disease (HD) mutation carriers showed loss of striatal [11C]UCB-J binding (also when corrected for atrophy), as well as in the neocortex (Delva et al, Neurology 2022). Moreover, regional synaptic loss was highly correlated to motor impairment.

In order to be able to use SV2A PET as widespread available biomarker tool to assess synaptic integrity, disease progression and/or response to mHTT lowering drugs, the short half-life of 11C (20 minutes) for [11C]UCB-J remains a hurdle. Recently, [18F]SynVesT-1, an optimized 18F-labeled analogue of [11C]UCB-J with similar kinetics, binding affinity, and test-retest precision properties has been evaluated in humans.

However, there is evidence from preclinical studies conducted at University of Antwerp that in the zQ175DN knock-in mouse model of HD, larger variability and lower effect-sizes are seen with [18F]SynVest-1 than with [11C]UCB-J.

In order to ascertain a similar effect size and quantification properties for [18F]SynVest-1 and [11C]UCB-J PET in human HD patients and to validate simplified measures (such as SUVR with white matter as reference region) and SynVest, this head-to-head fully quantitative study is performed.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

35

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

  • Name: Wim Vandenberghe, MD, PhD

Study Locations

      • Leuven, Belgium, 3000
        • Recruiting
        • UZ Leuven
        • Contact:
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Aline Delva, MD, PhD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Jolien Van Opstal, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Wim Vandenberghe, MD, PhD
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Koen Van Laere, MD, PhD, DSc

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 71 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Study Population

10 premanifest HD mutation carriers 10 manifest (stage 1 or 2) HD mutation carriers 10 age- and gender matched healthy controls

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Healthy controls (n = 10-20)

    • Subject is judged to be in good health by the investigator on the basis of medical history, physical examination including vital signs, clinical laboratory test and urinalysis.
    • No history or evidence of current major neurological, internal or psychiatric disorder, based on the medical assessment as described hereabove and neuropsychological assessment.
    • In subjects < 60 years of age, an unremarkable structural MRI scan as assessed by expert radiologist. In subjects >= 60 years of age white matter hyperintensities corresponding to a white matter lesion (WML) Fazekas score < 2 on the Age-Related White Matter changes scale are acceptable.
  2. HD-ISS stage 3 HD mutation carriers (n = 10)

    • HTT CAG repeat expansion 40 - 50
    • stage 3 as determined by the HD-ISS staging criteria
    • UHDRS TFC >/= 10
  3. HD-ISS stage 2 HD mutation carriers (n = 10)

    • HTT CAG repeat expansion 40 - 50
    • stage 2 as determined by the HD-ISS staging criteria
    • PIN score 0.47 - 1.84

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Neuropsychiatric diseases; for HD mutation carriers any neuropsychiatric diseases other than HD
  • Major internal medical diseases
  • White matter lesion load on FLAIR Fazekas score 2 or higher or other relevant MRI abnormalities
  • History of alcohol abuse or current alcohol abuse (chronic use of more than 15 units per week) or drug use
  • Contraindications for MR
  • Subject suffers from claustrophobia or cannot tolerate confinement during PET-MRI scanning procedures; subject cannot lie still for 30 minutes inside the scanner.
  • Subject is unwilling to avoid unusual, unaccustomed, or strenuous physical activity (i.e., weightlifting, running, bicycling) from the time of the pre-study visit until the end of scanning.
  • Subject does not understand the study procedures or does not have a guardian who understands the study procedures.
  • Subject (or guardian) is unwilling or unable to perform all of the study procedures or is considered unsuitable in any way by the principal investigator.
  • Subject is on anticoagulant therapy.
  • Subject is pregnant (according to Ulti Med hCG urine test) or breastfeeding.
  • Subject is a woman of childbearing potential who does not agree to apply appropriate contraception methods during study participation and continues to do so for at least 6 months after study completion.
  • Subject is a man with a pregnant or non-pregnant WOCBP partner, who does not agree to use a condom and continue to do so until 90 days after study completion. In addition, the non-pregnant WOCBP partner should use a highly effective method of contraception.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Cohort 1 + 2: healthy controls
Age -and sex matched to HD patients (to stage 3 HD patients for cohort 1 and to stage 2 HD patients for cohort 2)
11C-labeled SV2A binding PET radioligand
18F-labeled SV2A binding PET radioligand
Experimental: Cohort 1: stage 3 manifest HD patients
  • HTT CAG repeat expansion 40 - 50;
  • stage 3 as determined by the HD-ISS staging criteria;
  • UHDRS TFC >/= 10.
11C-labeled SV2A binding PET radioligand
18F-labeled SV2A binding PET radioligand
Experimental: Cohort 2: stage 2 manifest HD patients
  • HTT CAG repeat expansion 40 - 50;
  • stage 2 as determined by the HD-ISS criteria;
  • PIN score 0.47 to 1.84.
11C-labeled SV2A binding PET radioligand
18F-labeled SV2A binding PET radioligand

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Compare Vt of [11C]UCB-J and [18F]SynVest-1 in manifest HD and healthy controls
Time Frame: A first data analysis will be done when all cohort 1 subjects have undergone evaluations. A go-no-go decision will then be made before proceeding with cohort 2. Data analysis of cohort 2 subjects will follow completion of cohort 2.
Assess whether changes in total volume of distribution (Vt) are similar for [11C]UCB-J and [18F]SynVest-1 in manifest HD compared to healthy controls.
A first data analysis will be done when all cohort 1 subjects have undergone evaluations. A go-no-go decision will then be made before proceeding with cohort 2. Data analysis of cohort 2 subjects will follow completion of cohort 2.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Compare variance in Vt within groups for [11C]UCB-J and [18F]SynVest-1
Time Frame: A first data analysis will be done when all cohort 1 subjects have undergone evaluations. A go-no-go decision will then be made before proceeding with cohort 2. Data analysis of cohort 2 subjects will follow completion of cohort 2.
Compare the variance in total volume of distribution (Vt) between [11C]UCB-J and [18F]SynVest-1 in healthy volunteers and manifest HD patients.
A first data analysis will be done when all cohort 1 subjects have undergone evaluations. A go-no-go decision will then be made before proceeding with cohort 2. Data analysis of cohort 2 subjects will follow completion of cohort 2.
Compare simplified measures (BPND, SUVR) to assess group differences for [11]C-UCB-J and [18]F-SynVest-1
Time Frame: A first data analysis will be done when all cohort 1 subjects have undergone evaluations. A go-no-go decision will then be made before proceeding with cohort 2. Data analysis of cohort 2 subjects will follow completion of cohort 2.
Compare volume of distribution (Vt), BPND and SUVR between [11C]UCB-J and [18F]SynVest-1 in HD patients and healthy controls.
A first data analysis will be done when all cohort 1 subjects have undergone evaluations. A go-no-go decision will then be made before proceeding with cohort 2. Data analysis of cohort 2 subjects will follow completion of cohort 2.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Koen Van Laere, MD, PhD, DSc, UZ/KU Leuven

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 18, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 28, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 28, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

May 4, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 30, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 25, 2025

Last Verified

December 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

To be determined

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Huntington Disease

Clinical Trials on [11C]UCB-J PET

Subscribe