ScreenPlus: A Comprehensive, Flexible, Multi-disorder Newborn Screening Program (ScreenPlus)

May 30, 2023 updated by: Melissa Wasserstein, Albert Einstein College of Medicine
ScreenPlus is a consented, multi-disorder pilot newborn screening program implemented in conjunction with the New York State Newborn Screening Program that provides families the option to have their newborn(s) screened for a panel of additional conditions. The study has three primary objectives: 1) define the analytic and clinical validity of multi-tiered screening assays for a flexible panel of disorders, 2) determine disease incidence in an ethnically diverse population, and 3) assess the impact of early diagnosis on health outcomes. Over a five-year period, ScreenPlus aims to screen 175,000 infants born in nine high birthrate, ethnically diverse pilot hospitals in New York for a flexible panel of 14 rare genetic disorders. This study will also involve an evaluation of the Ethical, Legal and Social issues pertaining to NBS for complex disorders, which will be done via online surveys that will be directed towards ScreenPlus parents who opt to participate and qualitative interviews with families of infants who are identified through ScreenPlus.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Soon after birth, all babies born in the United States have a newborn screening (NBS) test to check for certain medical conditions. All babies are screened, even if they appear healthy, because most of these conditions have no obvious physical findings in a newborn and might otherwise be diagnosed only after the development of serious problems, such as brain damage, organ damage, or death. In fact, NBS has been an integral part of preventable health care for over five decades, ever since the discovery that phenylketonuria is an easily diagnosed, preventable cause of intellectual disability.

Over the past two decades, there have been dramatic advances in screening technology, with a resulting increase in the number and complexity of disorders on NBS panels. This enhanced ability to screen brings questions about what types of disorders are appropriate for NBS. To that end, the Advisory Committee on Heritable Disorders in Newborns and Children (ACHDNC) was established in 2003 to make evidence-based recommendations at the national level regarding the suitability of various disorders for NBS. At present, the Recommended Uniform Screening Panel, or the RUSP, includes 35 core disorders. The RUSP nomination process uses information about disease incidence and severity, natural history, benefits of early detection, safety and efficacy of treatment, analytic and clinical validity of the screening tests, as well as consideration of potential harms associated with screening and public health impact to determine whether a particular disorder is appropriate for NBS. However, there are many disorders for which this data is insufficient or missing. There are other disorders that challenge traditional NBS criteria by having predominantly later-onset phenotypes, poorly defined natural history, or unclear treatment outcomes. As these potentially life-threatening disorders might benefit from early detection, gathering and analyzing this data is both critical and timely. Accordingly, there is a great deal of interest in pilot NBS studies as a means to gather objective evidence about whether a disorder is appropriate for widespread screening.

ScreenPlus is a comprehensive, fluid, pilot NBS program that will screen 175,000 consented infants for specific disorders that are under consideration for universal NBS. This study will generate critical data about the validity of testing for these candidate disorders and provide estimates of disease incidence in a large, ethnically diverse population. The investigators will evaluate different consent and engagement models, including direct, in-person interaction and the use of a novel E-Consent framework to educate parents about pilot NBS. The investigators will also collect nuanced information about the ethical implications of NBS, by conducting qualitative interviews with parents of children who have received a positive or uncertain NBS result. Parents who are eligible to participate in ScreenPlus will also have the opportunity to complete a flexible set of surveys of parent opinions about expanded NBS, research using dried blood spots, and other relevant topics. Furthermore, newborns who screen positive will be followed by a ScreenPlus physician. Through thoughtful collaboration with disease experts, the investigators will help systematically collect disease specific measures through detailed long-term follow-up which will enable us to critically evaluate how affected children identified through ScreenPlus are faring, allowing objective assessment of the impact early diagnosis has on outcome.

The investigators will share this important data with the NBS community, including the ACHDNC, to help inform objective decision-making about widespread screening recommendations. The ScreenPlus panel is fluid and disorders may be added/removed as disorders satisfy the study inclusion criteria or are added to the RUSP and/or the New York State routine NBS panel. Additionally, recognizing that the NIH, advocacy groups, academics, and private industry all share a desire for clean, consented pilot NBS data, the investigators created a unique financial infrastructure. This investigator-driven arrangement permits all stakeholders to obtain aggregate data of interest in a mutually beneficial and cost-effective manner. ScreenPlus is guided by Scientific and Community Advisory Boards, who are comprised of rare disease experts, biochemistry specialists, physicians, bioethicists, and patient advocates. Overall, the investigators anticipate that ScreenPlus will become the premier consented pilot NBS program in the United States.

In sum, ScreenPlus will provide critical data about the appropriateness of NBS for candidate disorders, the feasibility and effectiveness of consented screening models, and parent informational needs and preferences as they relate to NBS for complex disorders.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

175000

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New York
      • Bronx, New York, United States, 10461
        • Jack D. Weiler Hospital
      • Bronx, New York, United States, 10467
        • ScreenPlus Coordinating Core, Children's Hospital at Montefiore
      • Brooklyn, New York, United States, 11219
        • Maimonides Medical Center
      • Brooklyn, New York, United States, 11220
        • NYU Langone Hospital - Brooklyn
      • Manhasset, New York, United States, 11030
        • North Shore University Hospital
      • New York, New York, United States, 10019
        • Mount Sinai West
      • New York, New York, United States, 10028
        • Mount Sinai Hospital
      • New York, New York, United States, 10016
        • NYU Langone Health - Tisch Hospital
      • Queens, New York, United States, 11040
        • Long Island Jewish Medical Center
      • Stony Brook, New York, United States, 11794
        • Stony Brook University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

No older than 4 weeks (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Newborns born at a ScreenPlus pilot hospital who are less than four weeks old.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All newborn infants born at a ScreenPlus pilot hospital
  • Infants who are less than four weeks old, regardless of sex, gestational age, or health status.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • A newborn screening sample is unavailable
  • Infants who are more than four weeks old

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Newborn infants born at a ScreenPlus pilot hospital
Parents who give permission will have their infant's sample screened for the ScreenPlus panel. Infants who screen positive after multi-tiered testing will be referred to a ScreenPlus doctor for confirmatory testing and care coordination.
All positive screens will be referred using standard notification procedures, where the New York State NBS reporting team contacts the ScreenPlus site medical geneticist, who will contact the newborn's pediatrician and family. The initial evaluation will include a clinical examination and confirmatory molecular studies, enzymatic and biomarker studies, when available. All aspects of the confirmatory testing will be at no cost to the participants. If confirmed to have a ScreenPlus disorder, the investigators will counsel the family and help connect them with treatment, clinical trials and disease specialists. The investigators will also provide emotional and social support resources to help in this journey.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Evaluate the accuracy of the screening assays.
Time Frame: Through study completion up to 5 years.
Accuracy of the screening assay will be defined in terms of positive predictive value (proportion of confirmed cases comparative to the total number of infants who screened positive).
Through study completion up to 5 years.
Define disease incidence in an ethnically diverse population.
Time Frame: Through study completion up to 5 years.
Disease incidence will be calculated as the proportion of infants with a disorder comparative to the total population of infants screened.
Through study completion up to 5 years.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 10, 2021

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 31, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 31, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 6, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 9, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

May 10, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 1, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 30, 2023

Last Verified

May 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 19-10-212
  • R01HD073292 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Mucopolysaccharidosis II

Clinical Trials on Confirmatory Testing

3
Subscribe