TEG Use in Children Undergoing Procedures With High Anticipated Blood Loss

May 11, 2023 updated by: Susan Goobie, Boston Children's Hospital

Thromboelastography (TEG) and Intraoperative Coagulation Management of Pediatric Patients Undergoing Procedures With High Anticipated Blood Loss

The research team proposes a prospective, observational study to better understand how TEG can be useful in guiding clinical practice in the Main OR for subject's undergoing high transfusion risk surgeries.

Intraoperatively, transfusion of blood products is frequently required to restore oxygen carrying capacity, perfusion and improve coagulation. Both under and over transfusion pose significant risks, particularly to pediatric patients with small starting intravascular volumes. Thromboelastography (TEG) is a validated method of dynamically assessing intraoperative coagulopathy via functional assay. However, while FDA approved and widely used in the adult setting, TEG is not commonly utilized in the setting of bleeding pediatric patients.

Recently, TEG has been made available at BCH for clinical purposes and is being used solely in the cardiac surgery setting. The investigators aim to provide TEG data for non-cardiac pediatric surgical cases with a high risk of intraoperative blood loss in order to assess the impact of this tool on intraoperative management.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Intraoperatively, transfusion of blood products is frequently required to restore oxygen carrying capacity, perfusion and improve coagulation. Both under and over transfusion pose significant risks, particularly to pediatric patients with small starting intravascular volumes. Thromboelastography (TEG) is a type of Viscoelastic testing (ROTEM is another example) and is a validated point of care method of dynamically assessing intraoperative coagulopathy via functional assay. It provides more useful information than the commonly used laboratory values of INR, PT, PTT and Fibrinogen. However, while FDA approved and widely used in the adult setting, TEG is not commonly utilized in the setting of bleeding pediatric patients. Recently, TEG has been made available at Boston Children's Hospital (BCH) for clinical purposes exclusively in the cardiac surgery setting. The investigators aim to provide TEG data for general main operating room (MOR) pediatric surgical cases with a high risk of intraoperative blood loss in order to assess the impact of this tool on intraoperative management of the bleeding patient.

Primary Aim:

Assess the efficacy of providing real time viscoelastic testing (TEG) to anesthesiologists managing of pediatric patients with hemostatic bleeding undergoing procedures with high historical rates of blood transfusions. The outcome will be perioperative (intraoperative and within 24 H postoperative) hemostatic blood product transfusion (type of blood product and volume mL/g) within specific high blood loss surgical procedures. Data will be compared to matched cohorts using historical data from the same surgery types available in the Department of Anesthesia Blood Management Database.

Secondary Aim:

Assess the feasibility of providing real time and interpreting TEG data in a busy, academic, pediatric main OR at relevant clinical time points. Pre-operative and post-operative surveys will be administered to clinicians to gauge interest and knowledge in using TEG.

Hypothesis

The hypothesis is that the availability of TEG to help the management of pediatric surgical patients at a high risk for blood loss will improve targeted transfusion management, decrease overall intraoperative blood product utilization, and decrease variability in care. This data may ultimately yield future BCH viscoelastic test-guided (VET) transfusion protocols allowing a goal-directed approach. Benefits from this approach might translate into:

I. less exposure of the pediatric patient to blood products, thereby reducing the inherent risks of transfusion such as transfusion reactions, blood product associated infections and TRALI/TACO II. a reduction in costs, and III. Identification of clinical processes, such as fibrinolysis, that might otherwise be missed, leading to specific interventions (e.g. use of antifibrinolytics).

Although different blood product transfusion algorithms have been described in different clinical settings, there are no current VET (TEG or ROTEM) protocols in use for pediatric MOR surgical patients at this single center. See Appendix A for both existing BCH massive hemorrhage guidelines (MHG) and a massive hemorrhage protocol (MHP) including VET guided care - published as a supplement to the 2019 Society for the advancement of blood management administrative and clinical standards for patient blood management programs publication6.

These VET MHG will be available to the providers to help diagnosis and guide hemostatic blood product transfusion management intraoperatively.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

No older than 20 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Pediatric patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery at BCH with a high likelihood of blood transfusion. Specifically these are defined as a surgery with greater than 25% likelihood of transfusion of any non-albumin blood product.
  • Eligible surgeries include:
  • spinal surgery
  • laparotomy
  • liver transplant
  • craniofacial surgery
  • esophageal atresia
  • craniotomy/hemispherectomy
  • major abdominal surgery
  • major hip surgery
  • major plastic surgery

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients undergoing cardiac surgery or ECMO cannulation, as these surgeries are generally considered outside the scope of general pediatric surgery.
  • Patients presenting for emergent surgery
  • Patients undergoing surgeries off hours (between 8pm and 8 am), when TEG analysis is unobtainable

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: TEG Arm

All patients enrolled in the study will have up to four 0.5cc blood samples obtained specifically for TEG analysis at the following defined points (for a total of up to 2cc of blood) when other routine labs are drawn (via an existing intravenous line or arterial line placed for clinical care) :

  • Once at the beginning of the case
  • Once at the end of the case
  • Up to two times at the same time as arterial blood gas (ABG) samples (if drawn)

The research team will collect the following information from the electronic medical record and input it into the Internal REDCap database:

  • De-identified demographic data, including age, height, weight, and diagnosis
  • Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative laboratory values( including PT, PTT, INR and fibrinogen and platelets), as dictated by standard clinical practice
  • Time of TEG results printed and time delivered to anesthesiologist
  • Complications/Adverse events within the first 48 hours postoperatively
Thromboelastography (TEG) is a type of Viscoelastic testing (ROTEM is another example) and is a validated point of care method of dynamically assessing intraoperative coagulopathy via functional assay.
Pre-operative and post-operative provider surveys will be distributed to anesthesiologists caring for study subjects to assess knowledge, practice, and attitudes about TEG.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Efficacy of utilizing Viscoelastic testing (Thromboelastography;TEG) to diagnose and guide management as measured by type of hemostatic blood products transfused.
Time Frame: 1 year
Assess the efficacy of utilizing Viscoelastic testing (TEG) in the diagnosis and management of hemostatic bleeding intraoperatively and compare to the current standard hemostatic product transfusion practice on the management of pediatric patients undergoing specific non-cardiac surgical procedures with high historical rates of transfusions at a single center. The efficacy of TEG will be measured in types of hemostatic blood products (fresh frozen plasma, platelets, cryoprecipitate) transfused within specific high blood loss surgical procedures as compared to historical matches controls which is available in the Department of Anesthesiology Patient Blood Management Database.
1 year
Efficacy of utilizing Viscoelastic testing (TEG) to diagnose and guide intraoperative management as measured by amount (mL/kg) hemostatic blood products transfused.
Time Frame: 1 year
Assess the efficacy of utilizing Viscoelastic testing (TEG) in the diagnosis and management of hemostatic bleeding in specific surgical cohorts and compare to the current standard hemostatic product transfusion practice on the management of pediatric patients undergoing specific non-cardiac surgical procedures with high historical rates of transfusions at BCH. The efficacy of TEG will be measured in amount (mL/kg) of hemostatic blood products (fresh frozen plasma, platelets, cryoprecipitate) transfused within specific high blood loss surgical procedures as compared to historical transfusion data ( and standard laboratory data including PT, PTT, INR and fibrinogen and platelets) for the same surgery types available in the Department of Anesthesiology Patient Blood Management Database.
1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Assess the feasibility of providing and interpreting TEG data in a busy, academic, pediatric non-cardiac operating room
Time Frame: 1 year
Assess the feasibility of providing and interpreting TEG data in a busy, academic, pediatric non-cardiac operating room at relevant clinical time points. Pre-operative and post-operative provider surveys will be distributed to assess knowledge, practice, and attitudes. Surveys responses will be free-form and multiple choice.
1 year
Red blood cell transfusion amounts
Time Frame: 1 year
The investigators will also compare red blood cell transfusion (mL/kg) amounts within the specific surgical cohorts between the TEG group and historical matched transfusion data.
1 year
Tranexamic acid (TXA) use
Time Frame: 1 year
The investigators will compare tranexamic (TXA) use within specific cohorts between the TEG group and historical matched transfusion data.
1 year
Cell salvage use
Time Frame: 1 year
The investigators will compare cell salvage use within specific cohorts between the TEG group and historical matched transfusion data.
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

September 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

June 1, 2024

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 9, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 13, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

May 18, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 15, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 11, 2023

Last Verified

May 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

There are no plans to share individual participant data with other researchers.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Surgical Blood Loss

Clinical Trials on Thromboelastography (TEG)

3
Subscribe