A Cluster Randomized Controlled Intervention to Improve Institutional Birth Rate in a Rural District of Ethiopia

May 26, 2022 updated by: Prof Yves Jacquemyn

Promoting Safe Motherhood in Ethiopia: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial

Despite the efforts from the government, maternal healthcare services utilization is far below the recommended level in Ethiopia with a high urban-rural disparity. Currently, two-thirds of pregnant women do not receive the recommended number of antenatal care, more than 50% of births are not attended by skilled birth attendants, and two-thirds of postpartum women do not receive postnatal checks, according to the 2019 EDHS report. There is also evidence that the rate of continuity of maternity care completion is low, implying that pregnant women are not getting the most out of the existing healthcare services. In Ethiopia, the rural communities are scattered over a wide geographic area some with difficult mountains and valleys. Hence, geographic barriers and limited information sources are likely to influence women's access to skilled birth attendance. As part of improving access and overcoming physical or geographical inaccessibility in rural areas, maternity waiting homes; residential lodgings built near healthcare facilities where expectant women near or at term would stay till the onset of labor is one of the measures taken by the Ethiopian government. The majority of the rural populations commonly have a lower perception of health services in general, and many traditional practices support behaviors that are inconsistent with effective health interventions. Thus, there is a challenge concerning behavior (social norms, beliefs, and culture) from the demand side related to utilizing maternity services on top of non/partial functionality of existing waiting homes. Therefore, this research project aimed at promoting access to and utilization of maternal healthcare services utilization in southern Ethiopia.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

Health centers and kebeles (villages) in the study setting were randomly assigned to intervention or comparison. We recruited all eligible pregnant women who reside in the respective selected health centres' catchment areas. In the intervention areas, community health workers (unpaid and volunteer women) were identified in consultation with the head of the villages/local leaders/. They received training on safe motherhood, the benefit and importance of maternity homes, identification of local beliefs, traditions and taboos that are barriers to birth preparation, stay in maternity homes and the use of maternal health services. The main functions of these trained community health worker in the intervention clusters include facilitating training sessions for pregnant women, assisting pregnant women in the preparation of birth preparedness plan, supporting pregnant women in starting and sustaining maternity care (prenatal care, skilled delivery and postnatal care). Pregnant women were also trained in the intervention clusters (12 sessions/4 sessions per cluster).

The training of both community health workers and pregnant women was based on a video story titled "Why Did Mr. X Die, Retold?" and a manual on working with individuals, families and communities to improve maternal and neonatal health from the World Health Organization.

After getting permission from the World Health Organization to use the video, we translated it into the local language and used it as an introduction during training. The training was designed based on the findings of preliminary studies and was intended to educate pregnant women about danger signs during pregnancy, labour and the postpartum period, about the birth preparation plan, the benefits and importance of waiting homes. In addition, it also covered how to develop a birth plan that included waiting home with the help of community health workers, as well as correcting misconceptions (belief-related barriers). The intervention was based on principles from the theory of planned behavior and the health belief model. These models were considered to offer direction for what types of variables and processes may be important in shaping maternal health behaviors and thus needed to be addressed in the intervention. The theory of planned behavior is used to explain and predict behavior based on attitudes, norms, and intentions and stipulates that an individual intention to act (behavior) is essentially a function of that individual's attitude toward that behavior and perceptions of social subjective norms. The health belief model which describes how health beliefs interact with modifying factors (e.g., perceived seriousness of problem) to determine health behaviors was also considered in developing the intervention.

The comparison group continued to receive maternal health information and services that are provided as part of the routine healthcare system. Both the baseline and end-line data were managed by trained interviewers using a mobile application supporting Open Data Kit. Data were analyzed through descriptive and inferential statistics (Chi-square test, McNemar tests and multi-level mixed-effects logistic regression analysis). For all analyses, a p-value of <0.05 was considered the level of significance.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

727

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Southern Nations Nationalities Regional State
      • Arba Minch, Southern Nations Nationalities Regional State, Ethiopia, 21
        • MEKDES KONDALE Gurara

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

13 years to 47 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Those who had resided for at least six months in the selected kebele clusters and had given birth in the five years preceding the survey were included to maintain homogeneity of information exposure. Another criterion for inclusion was a maximum gestational age of 27 weeks (end of second trimester) as participants were required to attend at least two sessions of the proposed promotional intervention before their due date.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Those who met the inclusion criteria but were critically ill at the time of enrolment and/or those who were reluctant to participate were excluded.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Safe motherhood Promotion(Educational, Counselling & Training) and maternity waiting homes upgrading
  1. Improving the quality of maternal health services in health centers (training for midwives in basic emergency obstetric care and upgrading maternity waiting homes to the level to provide basic accommodation to address access-related barriers
  2. Training community health workers with the aim of improving their knowledge about safe motherhood and about how to prepare a birth plan, including stays in maternity waiting homes
  3. Training pregnant women
Interventions included the training of community members, who subsequently led participatory educational sessions on safe motherhood topics with pregnant females. The project staff identified 2 community health workers and 15 female volunteers from each kebele cluster and trained them as research implementers. The implementers received 2 days of training led by the project team. The project staff and research implementers conducted safe-motherhood training comprising 2 h of information presentations and discussions with pregnant females in the intervention clusters. In addition to the pregnant-female intervention strategy, we also conducted a four-day training programme on clinical skills for local maternal and child healthcare providers in the study area. MWH intervention was also implemented in the intervention group, including upgrades to existing MWH services per national guidelines to standardize services and create a homelike environment for pregnant females.
Other Names:
  • improving maternity waiting homes
No Intervention: Comparison
The current standard service package

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
the location of the delivery (home vs. health facility)
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 9 months
institutional birth was used to indicate skilled birth attendance as trained health workers do not conduct deliveries outside of health facilities in these areas.
through study completion, an average of 9 months
health facility visits after childbirth (postnatal care use)
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 9 months
Having visited postnatal clinic after delivery
through study completion, an average of 9 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
knowledge of obstetric danger signs
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 9 months
Knowledge of birth danger signs was measured using the pregnant females' unprompted responses to the question related to the key danger signs during pregnancy, childbirth and postnatal period
through study completion, an average of 9 months
birth preparedness practice
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 9 months
Proportion of pregnant women that made prior arrangements for birth and complications
through study completion, an average of 9 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 14, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 17, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

November 20, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 10, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 17, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

May 23, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 1, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 26, 2022

Last Verified

May 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Maternal Health Services

Clinical Trials on Safe motherhood Promotion

3
Subscribe