Prospective Data Registry and Quality of Life Assessment of Patients Undergoing Radiotherapy With the RefleXion Medical Radiotherapy System (PREMIER)

August 5, 2022 updated by: RefleXion Medical

Prospective Data Registry and Quality of Life Assessment of PatientsUndergoing Radiotherapy With the RefleXion Medical Radiotherapy System (PREMIER Registry)

The purpose of this prospective cohort study is to assess clinical and quality of life measures as well as to define the severity of adverse effects for the use of the RefleXion system to deliver intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), in standard of care (SOC) use in the treatment of local,loco-regionally advanced, and oligometastatic malignancies. In addition, patient costs and charges will be analyzed to quantify the health economic impact of this modality. Workflow and quality of radiotherapy planning including a collection of dosimetric data will also be analyzed.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This is a multi-center prospective registry designed to assess the efficacy of IMRT and SBRT delivered via the RMRS. The study will seek to enroll approximately 500 patients initially and then remain open to further patients beyond at the discretion of the study sponsor and participating institutions. The number of IMRTandSBRT patients expected to enroll for the initial period is as follows:

  • N = 250 IMRT
  • N = 250 SBRT

Patients diagnosed with local, locoregionally advanced, or metastatic malignancies will be treated with IMRT or SBRT using the RMRS, with total dose, fractionation, and concurrent systemic therapy delivered according to the direction of the radiation oncology care team. The target population is patients for whom standard radiotherapy is prescribed using IMRT or SBRT. Data will be stratified by common radiotherapy divisions as follows:

  • Central Nervous System (Brain, spinal cord, and vertebral column)
  • Head and Neck
  • Thoracic
  • Gastrointestinal
  • Gynecologic
  • Genitourinary
  • Lymphoma
  • Melanoma/Sarcoma/Extremity
  • Non-Spine Bone and Other An additional substratum within each anatomic division will specify whether the treatment intent is for definitive treatment of the primary tumor (for early-stage or locally advanced disease), a definitive oligo/polymetastatic therapy, or a palliative therapy. Patients will be routinely assessed during their radiation course and thereafter for toxicity burden and HRQOL using the CTCAE v5, EORTC, and EuroQOL surveys. Patients will be assessed for 2years following their therapy. Other long-term follow-ups will capture data including routine laboratory evaluation, quality of life questionnaires, performance status, routine radiographic assessments, physical exams, etc.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

500

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • California
      • Duarte, California, United States, 91010
    • Texas
      • Dallas, Texas, United States, 75235
        • Recruiting
        • UT Southwestern
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Tu Dan, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

The purpose of this prospective cohort study is to assess clinical and quality of life measures as well as to define the severity of adverse effects for the use of the RefleXion system to deliver intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), in standard of care(SOC)use in the treatment of local, locoregionally advanced, and oligometastaticmalignancies. In addition, patient costs and charges will be analyzed to quantify the health economic impact of this modality. Workflow and quality of radiotherapy planning including collection of dosimetric data will also be analyzed.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Able to comprehend and willing to sign an informed consent form (ICF).
  • Diagnosis of local, loco-regionally advanced, or metastatic malignancy for whom radiotherapy is indicated
  • Radiotherapy to be delivered on the RMRS X1 with IMRT or SBRT technique.
  • Absence of concurrent illness that deems radiotherapy a contraindication which will be determined by the treating radiation oncologist.
  • Female and male patients of child-bearing potential willing to take appropriate precautions to avoid pregnancy while being treated. Permitted methods in preventing pregnancy should be communicated to the patient and their understanding confirmed by the treating Physician.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant or expecting to conceive during the study.
  • Has a known psychiatric or substance abuse disorder that would interfere with the participant's ability to cooperate with study requirements and follow-up visits.
  • Inability to maintain immobilization, supine position for planning and treatments.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Other
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy [SBRT]
Patients treated with Reflexion X1 with SBRT as the standard of care
Observation Registry for Medical Device
Other Names:
  • Reflexion X1
Intensity -Modulated Radiation Therapy [IMRT]
Patients treated with Reflexion X1 with IMRT as the standard of care
Observation Registry for Medical Device
Other Names:
  • Reflexion X1

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) scores
Time Frame: 30 Days

Evaluate patient-reported quality of life after IMRT or SBRT treatment delivered by the RefleXion system by assessing EORTC QLQ-C30.

The EORTC questionnaire has a scoring of 0 to 100 and is disease-specific. 0 is none/minimal symptoms and normal/good functional ability. 100 is increased/severe symptoms and decrease/poor functional ability.

30 Days
Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) scores
Time Frame: 90 Days

Evaluate patient-reported quality of life after IMRT or SBRT treatment delivered by the RefleXion system by assessing EORTC QLQ-C30.

The EORTC questionnaire has a scoring of 0 to 100 and is disease-specific. 0 is none/minimal symptoms and normal/good functional ability. 100 is increased/severe symptoms and decrease/poor functional ability.

90 Days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Long Term Health-Related Quality of Life-EORTC
Time Frame: 6 months, 9 months, 12 months, 18 months, and 24 months

Long-term Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) scores, including the EORTC QLQ-C30 at 6 months, 9 months, 12 months, 18 months, and 24 months.

The EORTC questionnaire has a scoring of 0 to 100 and is disease-specific. 0 is none/minimal symptoms and normal/good functional ability. 100 is increased/severe symptoms and decrease/poor functional ability.

6 months, 9 months, 12 months, 18 months, and 24 months
Long Term Health Related Quality of Life-EuroQol
Time Frame: 6 months, 9 months, 12 months, 18 months, and 24 months

The EuroQOL-5D-FL (EQ-5D) will be used in parallel with the Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) surveys to measure quality-adjusted life years.

The EQ-5D comprises five questions on mobility, self-care, pain, usual activities, and psychological status with three possible answers for each item (1=no problem, 2=moderate problem, 3=severe problem. A summary index with a maximum score of 1 can be derived from these five dimensions by conversion with a table of scores. The maximum score of 1 indicates the best health state, by contrast with the scores of individual questions, where higher scores indicate more severe or frequent problems.

6 months, 9 months, 12 months, 18 months, and 24 months
Acute toxicities related to Radiotherapy treatment
Time Frame: Up to 90 days
Proportion of patients with acute treatment toxicity for the anatomic site undergoing treatment
Up to 90 days
Disease Status [progression-free survival]
Time Frame: Through Study Completion, average of 2 years
Evaluate progression-free survival after intensity-modulated radiotherapy or stereotactic body radiotherapy for the cancers above. For prostate cancer cohort, biochemical progression-free survival will also be measured.
Through Study Completion, average of 2 years
Disease Status [local recurrence]
Time Frame: Through Study Completion, average of 2 years
Evaluate local control after intensity-modulated radiotherapy or stereotactic body radiotherapy for the cancers above.
Through Study Completion, average of 2 years
Disease Status [regional recurrence]
Time Frame: Through Study Completion, average of 2 years
Evaluate regional control after intensity-modulated radiotherapy or stereotactic body radiotherapy for the cancers above.
Through Study Completion, average of 2 years
Disease Status [distant recurrence]
Time Frame: Through Study Completion, average of 2 years
Evaluate distant control after intensity-modulated radiotherapy or stereotactic body radiotherapy for the cancers above.
Through Study Completion, average of 2 years
Disease Status [overall survival]
Time Frame: Through Study Completion, average of 2 years
Evaluate overall survival after intensity modulated radiotherapy or stereotactic body radiotherapy for the cancers above.
Through Study Completion, average of 2 years
Intervention and Episodic costs
Time Frame: Up to 6 months
Analyze resource utilization associated with the RefleXion system for the tumors above including the acute costs of intervention & 6-month episodic costs.
Up to 6 months
Long-term toxicities related to Radiotherapy
Time Frame: After 90 days through study completion
Analyze long term treatment toxicity for the anatomic site undergoing treatment
After 90 days through study completion

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Sean Shirvani, MD, RefleXion Medical
  • Study Director: Karine Feghali, MD, RefleXion Medical

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 12, 2022

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

April 25, 2026

Study Completion (Anticipated)

April 25, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 2, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 31, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

June 6, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 9, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 5, 2022

Last Verified

May 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cancer

Clinical Trials on Registry - Observational

3
Subscribe