A Trial of a Positive Psychology Intervention for Older Adults (RESET) During the COVID-19 Pandemic

April 23, 2024 updated by: Mary Janevic, University of Michigan

Improving Physical and Psychosocial Functioning in Underserved Older Adults During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Community Health Worker-Led Intervention

The heightened vulnerability to COVID-19 of African American older adults in Detroit, Michigan and other marginalized communities is linked to systemic racism experienced over the life course. Structural inequities also magnify the pandemic's impact on older adults' physical and psychosocial functioning. Many older adults in Detroit, burdened by poor health even before the pandemic, face a downward spiral of increased distress, reduced physical and social activity, and physical deconditioning. RESET (Re-Engaging in Self-care, Enjoying Today) is a self-management and resilience-building intervention led by community health workers (CHWs) at the Detroit Health Department (DHD). The central hypothesis of this study is that RESET, with components that include group telephone calls, a podcast series, and activity trackers, will improve psychosocial and physical functioning at 2 and 8 months. Specific aims are: 1) With input from a Community Advisory Board, modify RESET for group delivery and refine content after testing in a mini-pilot (n=10). 2) Conduct a randomized, controlled trial to assess the impact of RESET (compared to a one-time /telephone wellness check) on PROMIS-29 Psychosocial Score (a weighted combination of distress, fatigue, pain, social participation and sleep) among 456 primarily African American older adults age 50 and over who are at elevated risk of poor functioning. 3) Collect qualitative (interview) data from participants and other stakeholders, and use this data to better understand trial results, as well as to assess community impact and inform a dissemination toolkit.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

456

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Michigan
      • Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States, 48109
        • Recruiting
        • University of Michigan
        • Contact:
          • Rebecca Lindsay

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

50 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Any elevated physical or psychosocial symptoms as follows:

Depression: Score ≥3 on the Patient Health Questionnaire-2 (PHQ-2); Anxiety: Score > 3 on the GAD-2 anxiety screening scale; Fatigue: Rating >=4 on a 0 to 10 scale (0 = fatigued at all and 10 = extremely fatigued); Loneliness, as indicated by a score >=6 on 3-item UCLA Loneliness Scale; Perceived stress, as indicated by a mean score >3 on the Perceived Stress Scale-4; Chronic pain: Self-reported pain in muscles or joints for >3 months, >4 (0-10 scale) mean pain intensity over last month, and >=1 day in past month when pain made it difficult to do usual activities.

  • Have a cell or landline phone.
  • Able to converse comfortably in English.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Serious acute illness or hospitalization in last month.
  • Planned major surgery in next three months that would interfere with program participation (e.g., knee or hip replacement).
  • Severe cognitive impairment or dementia.
  • Any other diseases or conditions that would impair cooperation with the study team or ability to complete study procedures, as determined by the clinicians on the investigative team. This would include but not be limited to severe psychiatric disorders, active suicidal ideations or history of suicide attempts, and an uncontrolled drug and/or alcohol addiction).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: RESET intervention
Participants will engage in a 7-week positive psychology and self-management group telephone-based program.
RESET consists of 7 weekly group phone sessions led by Community Health Workers, along with an accompanying podcast series.Topics will include positive psychology, physical activity, social connection, eating well, relaxation, and more. There will be one individual session with the Community Health Worker to screen for unmet social needs and to offer connections to resources as needed. In the group sessions, participants will set goals incorporating positive activities and strategies to improve daily functioning. Up-to-date information related to COVID-19 prevention and treatment will be provided.
Other Names:
  • Re-Engaging in Self-care, Enjoying Today
Active Comparator: Wellness check control
Participants will receive educational information and an individual wellness check phone call from a Community Health Worker to screen for unmet social needs.
After completing the baseline survey, control group participants will be mailed an educational packet consisting of information about COVID-19 prevention and treatment, as well as essential community resources. Control group participants will also be invited to take part in a "wellness check" telephone session with a Community Health Worker, about a half-hour long, at which a social needs screener will be administered, and any needed referrals will be made. After completing the 8-month follow up, they will have the opportunity to participate in the full intervention.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in PROMIS-29 Mental (Psychosocial) Summary Score
Time Frame: Baseline, 2 months from baseline, and 8 months from baseline
Brief Description: The PROMIS-29 Mental (Psychosocial) Summary Score is a weighted composite of distress (depression and anxiety), pain (intensity and interference), social participation, fatigue, and sleep. Weights are provided in Hays et al (2018), "PROMIS-29 v2.0 profile physical and mental health summary scores", Quality of Life Research, 1885-1891. Scores are standardized on a T-score metric, with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10 in a referent population. A higher score means more of the concept being measured.
Baseline, 2 months from baseline, and 8 months from baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in PROMIS-29 Physical Summary Score
Time Frame: Baseline, 2 months from baseline, and 8 months from baseline
The PROMIS-29 Physical Summary Score is a weighted composite of physical functioning (the domain weighted most heavily), pain, and social participation. Weights are provided in Hays et al (2018), "PROMIS-29 v2.0 profile physical and mental health summary scores", Quality of Life Research, 1885-1891. Scores are standardized on a T-score metric, with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10 in a referent population. A higher score means more of the concept being measured.
Baseline, 2 months from baseline, and 8 months from baseline
Patient Global Impression of Change (Functioning)
Time Frame: 2 months from baseline, and 8 months from baseline
How participant thinks their functioning has changed from baseline (much worse (1) to much better (7)). Higher score represents a better outcome.
2 months from baseline, and 8 months from baseline
Change in Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale
Time Frame: Baseline, 2 months from baseline, and 8 months from baseline
This scale measures ability to bounce back from stressful times, on a 10-item scale made up of statements indicating use of resilient coping strategies, which respondents rate on a scale from (0) Never True At All to (4) True Nearly All the Time, for a total score range of 0 to 40. A higher score means greater resilience.
Baseline, 2 months from baseline, and 8 months from baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

November 30, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

November 30, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 7, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 7, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

July 11, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 25, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 23, 2024

Last Verified

April 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Fatigue

Clinical Trials on RESET

3
Subscribe