Postoperative Anelgesic Effect of Rhomboid Intercostal Nerve Block Versus Erector Spinae Plane Block

October 10, 2022 updated by: ghada fouad

Ultrasound Guided Rhomboid Intercostal Nerve Block Versus Erector Spinae Plane Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Modified Radical Mastectomy:A Comparative Study

Despite of analgesic effect of intravenous analgesic medications at intraoperative and postoperative time , The regional anesthetic techniquehas more benefits suchbetter control of Acute pain and hence less chronic pain and decreases the need for opioids and analgesics to preserve immune function which responsible for higher rates of infection and local recurrence, even metastasis .

New regional anesthetic technique for modified radical mastectomy discovered recently called rhomboid intercostal nerve block that will compared against erector spinae plane block .

Study Overview

Status

Enrolling by invitation

Conditions

Detailed Description

The aim of this study is to compare the post-operative analgesic effect of ultrasound-guided rhomboid intercostal nerve block versus erector spinae plane block as regard total analgesic requirements, duration of effective analgesia,postoperative visual analog score (VAS), peri-operative hemodynamics,peri-operative complications and incidence of chronic postmastectomy pain.The technique of rhomboid intercostal nerve block:

After induction of anesthesia, the patient will be positioned in lateral decubitus with the operated side above. After sterilization of the patient's back, A linear ultrasound transducer (6-12 MHz) will place medial to the lower border of the scapula with the orientation marker directed cranially. The ultrasound landmarks, trapezius muscle, rhomboid muscle, intercostal muscles, pleura, and lung will be identified. The tissue plain between the rhomboid major and intercostal muscles is identified, and a single injection is administered at the T4-5. 80mm 21-gage needle will be inserted in the plane view of the ultrasound probe at the level of T4-5. After negative aspiration of blood or air, the rhomboid intercostal plane was hydro located with 2 mL of normal saline to confirm the correct needle tip position. A single injection of 30 ml of bupivacaine 0.25% will be applied into the interfacial plane between the rhomboid major and intercostal muscles. The spread of local anesthetic solution under the rhomboid muscle will be visualized by ultrasonography.

The technique of Erector spinae plane block (ESP):

After induction of anesthesia, the patient will be positioned in lateral decubitus with the operated side above. After sterilization of the patient's back, A linear ultrasound probe willplace 3-cm lateral to the midline at the level of T5 interspinous space and transverse process and three muscles willidentify: trapezius, rhomboid major, and erector spinae. A 10-cm needle was inserted craniocaudally in-plane, to reach the transverse process. After hydrodissection of the plane with 3 mL of normal saline, 30 ml of 0.25% bupivacainewilldeposit and thus erector spinae muscle will lift off the transverse process.

Block assessment will be performed using ice cube withtemperature of 4°C at midclavicular linein post anesthesia care unit after Full recovery which be confirmed when Aldrete's score ≥9 .

Block success means at least3 dermatomal segments should be having decreased sensation to cold.

Failed block will be excluded from the study and patient will replaced by another patient.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

104

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Mansoura, Egypt
        • Mansoura University
    • Dakahlia
      • Mansoura, Dakahlia, Egypt, 35516
        • Mansoura University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

25 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • - Female patients aged between 25-65 years.
  • ASA physical status I or II.
  • Scheduled for elective unilateral modified radical mastectomy

Exclusion Criteria:

  • - Patient refusal.
  • Infection at the site of injection.
  • Hypersensitivity to the local anesthetic
  • Bleeding disorders.
  • Patients with cardiac, hepatic, and renal failure.
  • BMI ≥40 kg/m2
  • Patient with serum cr > 1.5

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: rhomboid intercostal plane block
as in intervention description
- 30 mL bupivacaine 0.25% will injected ultrasound-guided in rhomboid intercostal fascial plane .
Other Names:
  • fascial plane block
Experimental: Erector spinae plane block
As in intervention description
- 30 mL bupivacaine 0.25% will injected ultrasound-guided in rhomboid intercostal fascial plane .
Other Names:
  • fascial plane block

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The total analgesic requirements during the first 24 hours postoperative.
Time Frame: 0,2,4,6,8,10,12,16,20,24 hours postoperatively
All patients will receive standard postoperative analgesia (1gm paracetamol every 8 hours IV).
0,2,4,6,8,10,12,16,20,24 hours postoperatively

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The duration of effective analgesia
Time Frame: 0,2,4,6,8,10,12,16,20,24 hours postoperatively
time interval between the end of surgery and first analgesic request .
0,2,4,6,8,10,12,16,20,24 hours postoperatively

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Director: mohamed y makharita, MD, Professor OFanesthesia Mansoura university
  • Study Chair: ghada f amer, MD, Assistant professor of anesthesia Mansoura university
  • Principal Investigator: ahmed E Kamal, resident, resident of anesthesia mansoura university

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 6, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 6, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

July 11, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 12, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 10, 2022

Last Verified

October 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Post Operative Pain

Clinical Trials on Rhomboid intercostal plane block

3
Subscribe