Comparison of Effects of Motor, Sensory and Cognitive Exercises on Falls Prevention

July 19, 2022 updated by: Huiya Chen, Chung Shan Medical University

"Invisible" Balance Problems: the Comparison of Effects of Motor, Sensory and Cognitive Exercises on Falls Prevention in Community Dwelling Older Adults

Motor, sensory, and cognitive functions all contribute to balance maintenance, and age causes deterioration in these functions with associated declines in balance ability and accidental falls. Relatively speaking, the sensory and cognitive functions are "invisible" in designing falls-prevention programs. The relative proportions of training of motor, sensory, and cognitive functions, for the most efficient falls-prevention program is a practical and important issue but has not been studied yet by directly comparing their intervention effects.

This three-year project aims to provide evidence base for relative proportions of motor, sensory, and cognitive training when designing falls-prevention programs. The crossover randomized controlled trial (RCT) will recruit 120 community-dwelling elderly adults from local community centers. There will two experimental groups- sensory and cognitive training, one control group- motor training, each for 60 minutes per session, 3 times a week, for 16 weeks. The three groups will be trained with task-oriented design of balance exercise but focusing on different aspects, i.e., training will begin in the ICF body function level (focusing on motor, sensory, or cognitive function) in the stance position and will end in the ICF activity level (balance or mobility activities focusing on motor, sensory, or cognitive function). The primary outcome measures are rates of falls and near-falls in the ICF participation level, and the secondary measures are balance/mobility performance and risk of falling in the ICF activity level.

In Taiwan, a great amount of expense is paid to prevent falls in the community setting. Through better understanding of the comparative intervention effects between motor, sensory, and cognitive training, this project hope to be able to suggest the relative proportions of motor, sensory, and cognitive training in falls-prevention exercise design.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

120

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

60 years to 100 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • (1) older than 60 years of age, (2) living in the community, (3) scored more than two in Mini-Cog assessment [51], and (4) able to walk independently or with minimal assistance in the community

Exclusion Criteria:

  • (1) an injury or musculoskeletal system disorder that would hamper their ability to conduct the physical tests, (2) acute heart attack in recent 3-6 months or unstable angina, (3) uncontrolled atrial or ventricular arrhythmias, (4) aortic dissecting aneurysm, (5) severe aortic stenosis, (6) acute endocarditis/pericarditis, (7) uncontrolled blood pressure higher than 180/110 mmHg, (8) acute thromboembolism, (9) acute or severe heart failure, (10) acute or severe respiratory failure, (11) uncontrolled postural hypotension, (12) uncontrolled acute decompensated diabetes mellitus or low blood sugar, (13) any other circumstance the doctors believe prevents dosing physical activity.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: motor
Each group will receive 10-minute warm up, followed by 20-minute exercises in the ICF body function level, 20-minute exercises in the ICF activity level, and finally 10-minute cool down. The 10-minute war up include dynamic mobility exercises of the upper extremity and trunk (ribbons dancing on a chair) and of the lower extremity (marching in place). The 10-minute cool down include flexibility exercises of multiple muscles especially focusing on neck, hamstring, and calf muscles.
Experimental: sensory
Each group will receive 10-minute warm up, followed by 20-minute exercises in the ICF body function level, 20-minute exercises in the ICF activity level, and finally 10-minute cool down. The 10-minute war up include dynamic mobility exercises of the upper extremity and trunk (ribbons dancing on a chair) and of the lower extremity (marching in place). The 10-minute cool down include flexibility exercises of multiple muscles especially focusing on neck, hamstring, and calf muscles.
Experimental: cognitive
Each group will receive 10-minute warm up, followed by 20-minute exercises in the ICF body function level, 20-minute exercises in the ICF activity level, and finally 10-minute cool down. The 10-minute war up include dynamic mobility exercises of the upper extremity and trunk (ribbons dancing on a chair) and of the lower extremity (marching in place). The 10-minute cool down include flexibility exercises of multiple muscles especially focusing on neck, hamstring, and calf muscles.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Short form of Falls Efficacy Scale International
Time Frame: 5 minutes
Participants will be asked to report their concerns about falling from 1 to 4 when performing seven activities, including indoor activities, outdoor activities, and social events
5 minutes
Taiwan International Physical Activity Questionnaire-Short Form
Time Frame: 10 minutes
The frail criterion of the minimum weekly energy expenditure is 383 Kcal for men and 270 Kcal for women
10 minutes
Rate of falls
Time Frame: 3 minutes
participants will be interviewed for their falls history in the previous year
3 minutes
Rate of near-falls
Time Frame: 3 minutes
participants will be interviewed for their falls history in the previous year
3 minutes

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

September 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 30, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

August 30, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 17, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 19, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

July 20, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 20, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 19, 2022

Last Verified

July 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 001 (NavyGHB)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on falls-prevention programs

3
Subscribe