KP-Led Same Day HCV Test and Treat Study (479/65)

Key Population-Led Same Day Test and Treat for Hepatitis C in Community-Based Organizations in Bangkok, Thailand: A Demonstration Project

This is a Hybrid design to primarily assess effectiveness, and to secondarily observe and collect data on the implementation of the service. This will allow the assessment of health-related outcomes and implementation outcomes to facilitate dissemination and replication if proven to be successful in other CBOs in Thailand, regionally, and globally.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

Implementation Effectiveness To assess effectiveness, an interrupted time series (ITS) design. The counterfactual scenario (under which KP-led HCV test and treat had not been implemented) will be determined using routine service data collected from 15 months prior to the study implementation, and will provide a comparison for the evaluation of the impact of KP-led HCV test and treat by examining any change occurring in the primary outcomes in the post-implementation period during the 15 months of the study.

Implementation Strategies To assess implementation, Proctor's model was used to guide the selection of relevant implementation outcomes, which during this stage of implementation are acceptability, feasibility, and fidelity. Socio-ecological level, framework, and relevant constructs for each outcome are outlined below and in table 1.

  1. Acceptability of KP-led HCV test and treat Acceptability refers to the perception that the service is agreeable and satisfactory. It will be measured using surveys at four socio-ecological levels, informed by different frameworks according to relevance

    • Clients, pre-implementation: The Health Belief Model (HBM) will be used to design a survey to assess determinants that drive the acceptability of HCV test and treat services at the CBO. The HBM is one of the first theories of health behavior, and addresses the individual's perception of the threat posed by a health problem and factors influencing the decision to act. This assessment will be conducted pre-implementation, and findings will inform the design of implementation strategies targeting clients
    • Clients, during implementation: To assess the acceptability and satisfaction of the same day HCV test and treat service, clients who initiated DAA treatment at the CBO will be asked to complete a standard survey on acceptability and satisfaction
    • Providers: The Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) will be used to design a survey to assess factors that influence the acceptability of HCV test and treat among KP-lay providers. The TPB examines the relations between an individual's belief, attitudes, intentions, behavior, and perceived control over that behavior. This assessment will be conducted pre-implementation, and findings will inform the design of implementation strategies targeting providers.
    • CBO leadership: The Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) will also be used to design a survey to assess factors that influence the acceptability of HCV test and treat among CBO leaderships. This assessment will be conducted pre-implementation, and findings will inform the design of implementation strategies targeting CBO leadership.
    • Policy makers: The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) will be used to produce interview guides to assess the acceptability of the service among key government stakeholders and policy makers.
  2. Feasibility of providing KP-led HCV test and treat by KP-lay providers in CBOs

    Feasibility refers to the extent to which the service can be successfully delivered within the CBO setting. It will be measured at two socio-ecological levels:

    • Providers: Training records, and surveys and in-depth interviews informed by CFIR.
    • CBO leadership: CFIR will be used to design surveys to assess relevant domains and constructs, and in-depth interviews will be conducted to further explore survey findings.
  3. Fidelity of KP-led HCV test and treat implementation Fidelity refers to the extent to which the service was delivered as intended. It will be measured at the provider level using observation, checklists, and assessment of client records, guided by CFIR.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

200

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Rena Janamnuaysook, MBA
  • Phone Number: 6698 516 4562
  • Email: rena.j@ihri.org

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Bangkapi
      • Bangkok, Bangkapi, Thailand, 10240
        • Recruiting
        • Rainbow Sky Association of Thailand (RSAT)
        • Contact:
    • Bangkok
      • Pathum wan, Bangkok, Thailand, 10330
        • Recruiting
        • Institute of HIV Research and Innovation
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
          • Rena Janamnuaysook, MBA
          • Phone Number: +66 2 1605371
          • Email: rena.j@ihri.org
    • Building 3, Patpong, Surawong Road
      • Bangkok, Building 3, Patpong, Surawong Road, Thailand, 10500
        • Recruiting
        • The Service Workers In Group Foundation (SWING)
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Eligibility criteria for assessment of effectiveness outcomes:

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Thai citizen
  • 18 years or older
  • Signed informed consent
  • Tested anti-HCV positive

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Decline to participate in the research

Eligibility criteria assessment of implementation outcomes:

Inclusion criteria:

  • Client level: Tested anti-HCV positive at one of the implementing CBOs
  • Provider level: KP lay providers providing KP-led Same Day HCV Test and Treat
  • Leadership level: leadership of implementing CBOs
  • Government level: involved in policy making related to HCV testing and treatment in key populations

Exclusion criteria:

  • Do not provide informed consent to participate in the research

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Implementation for anti-HCV reactive client
All clients who test anti-HCV positive at the study CBOs will be assessed for the inclusion criteria. Eligible clients will be informed and offered to participate in the study.

After completing informed consent procedures, screening procedures will take place to assess eligibility. Clients who are anti-HCV and HCV-RNA positive, but meet one/more ineligible characteristics for simplified treatment will be referred to a hepatologist for treatment initiation.

Participants who are HCV-RNA positive and otherwise eligible will be offered to initiate DAAs at the CBO, followed by telehealth visits at week 4 and 8 and CBO visits at week 12, and week 24. If a visit is requested by the client, it can be conducted through telehealth or in-person at the clinic depending on client preferences. Substance use will be assessed using ASSIST, Retention in care, occurrence of adverse events during treatment, completion of treatment, and SVR achievement will be assessed. Clients who achieve SVR will be retested with HCV-RNA every 3 months to assess HCV re-infection. Clients who do not achieve SVR will be referred for further analysis and treatment.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The proportion of eligible clients initiating DAAs
Time Frame: 18 months
The proportion of eligible clients initiating DAAs in CBOs under KP-led HCV test and treat in CBOs as compared to pre-implementation.
18 months
The proportion of complete tretmented client
Time Frame: 18 months
The proportion of clients who complete 12 weeks of treatment under KP-led HCV test and treat in CBOs as compared to pre-implementation.
18 months
The proportion of SVR achieved client
Time Frame: 18 months
The proportion of clients who achieve SVR at 12 weeks after treatment completion under KP-led HCV test and treat in CBOs as compared to pre-implementation.
18 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The HCV re-infection rates
Time Frame: 18 months
Proportion of clients with HCV-reinfection among those who had previously achieved SVR
18 months
The duration to DAA initiation among clients with chronic HCV infection
Time Frame: 18 months
Time from anti-HCV positivity to DAA initiation among clients with chronic HCV infection pre- compared to post-implementation
18 months
The acceptability of KP-led HCV test and treat
Time Frame: 18 months
The acceptability of KP-led HCV test and treat will be measured via survey and/or in-depth interviews with clients, providers, CBO leadership, and policymakers
18 months
Provider perception of KP-led HCV test and treat feasibility.
Time Frame: 18 months
The feasibility of providing KP-led HCV test and treat will be measured via survey and/or in-depth interviews with KP-lay providers.
18 months
The fidelity of provider during the implementation
Time Frame: 18 months
The KP-led HCV test and treat fidelity of KP-lay providers will be assessed through service delivery checklists and case report forms.
18 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 20, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 15, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 30, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 6, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 26, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

July 29, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 28, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 27, 2023

Last Verified

September 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

  • IHRI018

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on HCV, HIV

Clinical Trials on KP-Led HCV test and treat service

3
Subscribe