Calcium Hydroxide Versus Premixed Bioceramic Putty in Direct Pulp Capping of Primary Molars

August 8, 2022 updated by: Merrette Basem Khalaf Sedhom, Minia University

Calcium Hydroxide Versus Premixed Bioceramic Putty in Direct Pulp Capping of Primary Molars: An Equivalent Parallel Randomized Controlled Trial

The trial will be conducted to evaluate and compare calcium hydroxide and premixed bioceramic putty regarding the clinical and radiographic outcomes of direct pulp capping in primary molars.

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

The current equivalent parallel randomized controlled trial will be conducted to evaluate and compare calcium hydroxide and premixed bioceramic putty regarding the clinical and radiographic outcomes of direct pulp capping in primary molars over a 24-month follow-up period.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

100

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Minya, Egypt
        • Minia University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

4 years to 6 years (CHILD)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 1. Clinical:

    1. Children categorized as class I or II according to American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) scale.
    2. Children rated as no. 3 or 4 in Frankl behaviour rating scale (FBRS).
    3. Presence of a small carious or traumatic pulp exposure (1 mm or less). 2. Radiographic:
    1. Presence of at least two-thirds of root length.
    2. Normal lamina dura and periodontal ligament space.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • 1. Clinical:

    1. History of spontaneous unprovoked toothache.
    2. Extensive crown destruction that preclude coronal restoration.
    3. Gingival swelling, sinus tract or other soft tissue pathology.
    4. Abnormal tooth mobility.
    5. A frank pulp exposure (i.e., greater than 1.0mm), requiring pulpotomy.
    6. No evidence of visible pulp exposure.

      2. Radiographic:

    1. Furcation/periapical radiolucency.
    2. Pathological internal/external root resorption.
    3. Absence of underlying permanent successor

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: DOUBLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Group I (control): Calcium hydroxide cement
Pulp capping material
caries will be removed, and if the pulps are exposed, the material will be place directly over the exposed pulp.
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Group 2: Premixed bioceramic putty
Pulp capping material
caries will be removed, and if the pulps are exposed, the material will be place directly over the exposed pulp.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinical findings
Time Frame: 2 year follow up

The children will be recalled for postoperative clinical & radiographic assessments at the following intervals; six, twelve, eighteen,and twenty-four months.the treatment will be considered successful if none of the following clinical or radiographic findings is present:

Clinical criteria:

  1. Pain.
  2. Tenderness to palpation or percussion
  3. Gingival swelling or sinus tract.
  4. Purulent exudate expressed from the gingival margin.
  5. Abnormal tooth mobility.
2 year follow up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

November 2, 2021

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

November 2, 2023

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

December 2, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 5, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 8, 2022

First Posted (ACTUAL)

August 11, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

August 11, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 8, 2022

Last Verified

August 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 524_1/11/2021

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Direct Pulp Capping

Clinical Trials on direct pulp capping in primary molars

3
Subscribe