Testing a Scalable Model of Care to Improve Patients Access to Mental Health Services After Traumatic Injury

January 2, 2024 updated by: Kenneth J. Ruggiero, Medical University of South Carolina
The purpose of this study to learn about patients' experience with the Trauma Resilience and Recovery program (TRRP) and/or the enhanced care group.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

In 2015, our team launched the Trauma Resilience and Recovery Program (TRRP) at the Medical University of South Carolina's Level I trauma center. TRRP is a stepped model of care that is designed to deliver education at the bedside about mental health recovery after traumatic injury as well as risk assessment and brief intervention for high-risk patients (Step 1), foster symptom self-monitoring and continued education via our automated text messaging system (Step 2), screen for PTSD and depression by chatbot or telephone 30 days post-injury (Step 3), and provide a referral and warm handoff to mental health services if needed (Step 4). The purpose of the proposed study is to examine the clinical and functional impact of TRRP over a period of 12 months. We will conduct a randomized controlled trial (RCT) with one-year follow up of TRRP vs. enhanced usual care (EUC) with 350 patients at The George Washington University (GWU) hospital, which serves a diverse population of ~2000 trauma center patients per year (15% penetrating mechanism). Trained, supervised interviewers blind to study condition will assess clinical and functional outcomes 3-, 6-, and 12-months post-baseline (Aim 1). Qualitative interviews will be conducted with ≥ 30 patients from underrepresented minority groups (i.e., African American, Latinx) as well as ≥ 20 victims of violent trauma (penetrating mechanism) to identify opportunities to strengthen the model to meet the diverse needs of these patients (Aim 2). GWU does not currently have an embedded mental health program in place, which will enable us to explore implementation determinants systematically (Aim 3).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

350

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Virginia
      • Washington, Virginia, United States, 20037
        • Recruiting
        • George Washington University Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Susan Kartiko, MD/PhD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Babak Sarani, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Brandon A Kohrt, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • English- or Spanish-speaking patients ≥ 16 years old who are admitted to George Washington University hospital's trauma center and screen positive on the Injured Trauma Survivors Screen (which indicates risk for development of posttraumatic stress disorder and/or depression) will be included.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who have a Glasgow Coma Scale score under 13 at hospital admission, moderate to severe cognitive impairment (as measured by the Montreal Cognitive Assessment), active psychosis, or injury that prevents verbal communication (e.g., serious head or spinal cord injury) or is self-inflicted will be excluded. Patients with positive substance use screens via GWU's SBIRT protocol (~7% of the patient population) will be assessed by the clinical team with reference to severity and recency of substance use problems. We have found at MUSC that a high percentage of patients with SBIRT- positive screens are nevertheless good candidates for TRRP (>85%), but patients with serious, active substance abuse problems are likely not good candidates for TRRP and therefore will be excluded and referred to a substance use treatment center.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Trauma Resilience and Recovery Program
TRRP is a stepped model of care that delivers education at the bedside about mental health recovery after traumatic injury as well as risk assessment and brief intervention for high-risk patients (Step 1), fosters symptom monitoring and continued education (Step 2), screens for PTSD and depression 30 days post-injury (Step 3), and provides a referral and warm handoff to mental health services if needed (Step 4)
The Trauma Resilience and Recovery Program is a stepped model of care that is designed to deliver education at the bedside about mental health recovery after traumatic injury as well as risk assessment and brief intervention for high-risk patients (Step 1), foster symptom self-monitoring and continued education (Step 2), screen for PTSD and depression 30 days post-injury (Step 3), and provide a referral and warm handoff to mental health services if needed (Step 4).
No Intervention: Enhanced Usual Care Condition
Patients in the EUC arm will be given education about mental health after traumatic injury, educational materials about mental health recovery, and local referral information to assist treatment-seeking patients in seeking care.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from Baseline PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 8- item (PCL8-5) at 3-,6-, and 12-month
Time Frame: Baseline, 3-, 6-, and 12- months post-baseline
The PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (Weathers et al., 2013) is a self-report measure that assesses the extent to which participants are bothered by the DSM-5 PTSD symptoms. Each symptom is rated on a scale of 0 (not at all) to 4 (extremely). Total scores are obtained by summing the scores of all items. The 8-item adaptation includes assessment of intrusive thoughts, avoidance of external reminders, negative expectations of self/ world, easily startled, emotional cue reactivity, avoidance of thoughts/emotions, loss of interest, and difficulty concentrating. The PCL8-5 has strong psychometric properties and clinical utility data similar to that of the long version.
Baseline, 3-, 6-, and 12- months post-baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Demographics
Time Frame: Baseline
Patients will provide standard demographic information, such as race/ethnicity; sex; gender identity; immigration, insurance, marital, and socioeconomic status; language; educational attainment; and occupation
Baseline
Injured Trauma Survivor Screen (ITSS)
Time Frame: Baseline
Injured Trauma Survivor Screen (ITSS) is a 9-item measure used to assess risk for development of posttraumatic stress symptoms following injury. Items are rated yes=1 and no=0. If the sum of questions 1, 2, 3, 5, and 6 is equal to or greater than 2, the screen is positive for PTSD risk. If the sum of questions 3, 4, 7, 8, and 9 is equal or greater than 2, the screen is positive for depression risk.
Baseline
Electronic Medical Record Data (EMR)
Time Frame: Baseline
Data will be collected at baseline via the electronic medical record including patients' length of stay; injury severity scores; number of emergency department visits; and opioid, anti-anxiety and anti-depression medications prescribed.
Baseline
The Kessler 6 (K6)
Time Frame: Baseline, 3-, 6-, and 12- months post-baseline
The Kessler 6 (K6) is a screening scale for nonspecific distress to discriminate cases of severe mental illness. Items are rated on a 5-point Likert scale (0-4). Total scores range from 0-24 and are calculated as the sum of all item ratings, with a total score ≥ 5 indicating moderate levels of distress and scores ≥ 13 indicating severe mental illness. This measure has been shown to have strong psychometric properties.
Baseline, 3-, 6-, and 12- months post-baseline
PROMIS Emotional and Instrumental Support
Time Frame: Baseline, 3-, 6-, and 12- months post-baseline

The PROMIS Emotion and Instrumental Support measure assesses perceived feelings of being cared for and valued as a person; having confidant relationships and availability of assistance with material, cognitive, or task performance.

  • Calculate a summed score across all items. All item responses scored on a scale of 1-5 where Never = 1, Always = 5
  • 3. Score of a 50 is the average for US population, SD of 10
Baseline, 3-, 6-, and 12- months post-baseline
The Major Experiences and Everyday Discrimination Scale
Time Frame: Baseline, 3-, 6-, and 12- months post-baseline

The Major Experiences and Everyday Discrimination Scales include 19 yes-or-no and frequency response category questions. The Major Experiences subscale includes 9 questions about employment, housing, and education; the Everyday Discrimination subscale includes 10 questions about interactions with other people, including courtesy, respect, and harassment.

* no scoring needed at this time.

Baseline, 3-, 6-, and 12- months post-baseline
National Health Interview Survey Adult Access to Health Care and Utilization Module
Time Frame: Baseline, 3-, 6-, and 12- months post-baseline
This protocol includes 10 interviewer-administered questions from the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) Adult Access to Health Care & Utilization Module designed to assess when medical care was last sought, usual place of care, frequency of getting medical care and reasons for not getting medical care.
Baseline, 3-, 6-, and 12- months post-baseline
The California Health Interview Survey (CHIS) question
Time Frame: Baseline, 3-, 6-, and 12- months post-baseline
The California Health Interview Survey (CHIS) question allows a binary measurement of perceived prejudice, stereotyping, and discrimination in clinical encounters and experience.
Baseline, 3-, 6-, and 12- months post-baseline
Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)
Time Frame: 3-, 6-, and 12-months post- baseline assessment
The Patient Health Questionniare-9 (PHQ-9) assesses the presence and frequency of 9 core depressive symptoms. Items are rated on a 4-point Likert scale (0-3). Total scores range from 0-27 and are calculated as the sum of all item ratings, with a total score of ≥ 10 indicating clinical significance.
3-, 6-, and 12-months post- baseline assessment
Acceptance of Treatment Referral and Initiation of Treatment
Time Frame: 3-, 6-, and 12-months post- baseline assessment
Patients will be asked whether they considered seeking assistance for mental health needs and whether they actually sought help. These questions will be based on semi-structured interviews administered via our needs assessment that were adapted from epidemiologic interviews conducted by our team in the aftermath of the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks and recent natural disasters. Follow-up questions will inquire about whether patients sought help from family members, friends, chaplains, mental health professionals, or other health care professionals.
3-, 6-, and 12-months post- baseline assessment
PROMIS Pain Intensity and Interference Scale
Time Frame: 3-, 6-, and 12-months post- baseline assessment

The PROMIS Pain Intensity and Interference scale assesses patients' pain and the extent to which it affects enjoyment of various activities in the past 7 days.

  • Calculate a summed score access all items. All item responses scored on a scale of 1-5 where Never=1, Always = 5
  • Score of a 50 is the average for US population, SD of 10.
3-, 6-, and 12-months post- baseline assessment
PROMIS Self-Efficacy
Time Frame: 3-, 6-, and 12-months post- baseline assessment

The 4-item PROMIS Self-Efficacy scale is a measure of confidence in one's ability to deal effectively with a variety of stressful situations.

  • Calculate a summed score access all items. All item responses scored on a scale of 1-5 where Never=1, Always = 5
  • Score of a 50 is the average for US population, SD of 10.
3-, 6-, and 12-months post- baseline assessment
PROMIS Sleep Disturbance
Time Frame: 3, 6, and 12-months post- baseline assessment

The 4-item PROMIS Sleep Disturbance scale assesses perceptions of sleep quality, sleep depth, and restoration associated with sleep.

  • Calculate a summed score access all items. All item responses scored on a scale of 1-5.
  • Score of a 50 is the average for US population, SD of 10.
3, 6, and 12-months post- baseline assessment
PROMIS Global Health
Time Frame: 3, 6, and 12-months post- baseline assessment
The 10-item PROMIS Global Health questionnaire measures one's overall evaluation of one's physical and mental health.
3, 6, and 12-months post- baseline assessment
National Adverse Childhood Experiences Questions
Time Frame: 3-months post-baseline
The six-item standard measure from the U.S. Department of Agriculture Economic Research Service is a validated, well-established measure of the availability, accessibility, and affordability of nutritionally adequate food.
3-months post-baseline
NHIS Mental Health Care Module
Time Frame: Baseline, 3-,6-, and 12-month post baseline
6 items is designed to assess when mental health care was last sough, usual place of care, frequency of getting mental health care and reasons for not getting mental health care.
Baseline, 3-,6-, and 12-month post baseline
Stigma Scale for Receiving Psychological Help
Time Frame: 3-month post- baseline assessment

The Stigma Scale for Receiving Psychological Help assesses individuals' perceptions of how stigmatizing it is to receive psychological treatment. The SSRPH consists of 5 questions rated on a 3-point Likert scale.

Total Score Instructions: Total score of the 5 items. No Items are reverse scored.

3-month post- baseline assessment
NIDA Quick Screen (items 2-4); alcohol, tobacco, prescription and illicit drug use
Time Frame: 3-, 6-, and 12-months post- baseline assessment
The NIDA Quick Screen is a validated instrument designed to assist providers in screening adults for substance use. The screen simply inquires whether a participant has used drugs (mood-altering, illegal, or prescription for nonmedical reasons), alcohol, or tobacco products within the past year and how often these substances have been used.
3-, 6-, and 12-months post- baseline assessment
Collective Efficacy (Neighborhood Environment)
Time Frame: 3-months post-baseline
The Neighborhood Environment Scale measures perceived neighborhood context and provides an estimate of cumulative exposure to adversity in childhood.
3-months post-baseline
PROMIS Sleep Distrubance
Time Frame: 3-,6-,12-month post-baseline assessments.
The PROMIS Sleep Disturbance instruments assess self-reported perceptions of sleep quality, sleep depth, and restoration associated with sleep. This includes perceived difficulties and concerns with getting to sleep or staying asleep, as well as perceptions of the adequacy of and satisfaction with sleep.
3-,6-,12-month post-baseline assessments.
AUDIT-C
Time Frame: 3-,6-,12-month post baseline
The Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT-C) is an alcohol screen that can help identify patients who are hazardous drinkers or have active alcohol use disorders (including alcohol abuse or dependence).
3-,6-,12-month post baseline
CMH SDOH items
Time Frame: Baseline, 3-,6-,12-month post baseline

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation (CMMI) made the Accountable Health Communities (AHC) Health-Related Social Needs (HRSN) Screening Tool to use in the AHC Model.1 The test is to see if systematically finding and dealing with the health-related social needs of Medicare and Medicaid beneficiaries has any effect on their total health care costs and makes their health outcomes better.

The Tool can help providers find out patients' needs in these 5 core domains that community services can help with: Housing instability, food insecurity, transportation problems, Utility help needs and interpersonal safety.

Baseline, 3-,6-,12-month post baseline
NHIS Job Status
Time Frame: Baseline, 3-,6-,and 12-month post baseline
Consistent with Zatzick and colleagues (2008) we will ask patients about post-injury occupational status.
Baseline, 3-,6-,and 12-month post baseline
Discrimination in Medical Settings
Time Frame: 3-month post baseline
The 7-item Discrimination in Medical Settings will measure perceived discrimination.
3-month post baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Kenneth Ruggiero, PhD, Medical University of South Carolina

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 4, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

August 31, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

August 31, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 5, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 9, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

August 11, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 5, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 2, 2024

Last Verified

January 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 20901
  • 1R01HS028006-01A1 (U.S. AHRQ Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

First, we will analyze the qualitative and quantitative data from our interviews and randomized controlled trial and will share these data via The National Database for Clinical Trials Related to Mental Illness. We will prepare both brief and comprehensive reports for AHRQ as we have done in prior NIH studies. We also will disseminate reports of our findings via print copy to the MUSC and GWU Public Relations office and websites. Additionally, we will prepare manuscripts for submission to research journals, such as JAMA, JAMA Surgery, JAMA Psychiatry, Am J Psychiatry, J Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, J Am College of Surgeons, Am J Public Health, and other sources that ensure broad dissemination. Additionally, as we have done previously with other federally funded grants, we will seek to present our findings to AHRQ staff and at national and international conferences.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Data will become available Year 3 quarter 3 of the study

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

REDCap data dictionaries can be distributed for reuse at multiple institutions. A library of data dictionaries is made available for standards-based data collection forms and validated instruments. The underlying database is hosted in a secure data center at MUSC, a secure environment for data systems and servers on campus, and includes redundancy, failover capability, backups and extensive security checks.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Depression

Clinical Trials on Trauma Resilience and Recovery Program

3
Subscribe