- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05507736
Feasibility and Safety of Acupuncture in the Prevention of Late Irinotecan-related Diarrhea in Pediatric Patients (AIP2021)
Feasibility and Safety of the Use of Acupuncture in the Prevention of Late-onset Diarrhea Associated With Irinotecan in Pediatric Patients With Solid Tumors: Controlled Pilot Study
To evaluate the feasibility of an acupuncture protocol in the prevention of late diarrhea due to irinotecan in pediatric patients with solid tumors, a pre-post pilot study will be conducted.
Pre-post pilot study non-randomized, open label, single arm study. There will be a single study group that will be used at the same time as your own control. The intervention will take place for approximately one year.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Pre-post pilot study non-randomized, open label, single arm study.
The objective of this pilot study is to demonstrate that cancer acupuncture pediatric treatment is a safe and feasible treatment in the prevention of late-onset diarrhea related to with irinotecan.
This pilot study will include patients between 0 and 18 years of age with a solid tumor (nephroblastoma, neuroblastoma, central nervous system tumors and rhabdomyosarcoma) receiving their first cycle of irinotecan, in our center, at 50 mg/m2/intravenous dose daily for five days (cumulative dose weekly = 250 mg/m2) and who do not receive concomitant abdominal radiotherapy. Acupuncture will be applied as a complementary treatment along with the usual regimen of prophylaxis and treatment of late diarrhea.
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Esther Martinez, MD
- Phone Number: 80524 +34 932532100
- Email: esther.martinez@sjd.es
Study Locations
-
-
Barcelona
-
Esplugues De Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain, 08950
- Recruiting
- Hospital Sant Joan de Déu
-
Contact:
- Esther Martinez, MD
- Phone Number: 80524 +34 9.2532100
- Email: esther.martinez@sjd.es
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients from 0 to 18 years old with solid tumors who start treatment in our center with irinotecan at 50 mg/m2/intravenous dose in day hospital.
- Blood tests prior to the start of the appropriate chemotherapy cycle to receive acupuncture with continuous stimulation needle insertion: neutrophils greater or equal to 1000 cells/mm3 and platelets greater than or equal to 50,000 cells/mm3.
- Signature of informed consent by parents in the case of children under 12 years of age and assent of the minor.
- Signature of informed consent in the case of those over 12 years of age
Exclusion Criteria:
- Participate in a clinical trial that is developed in the Pediatric Oncology Area of the Hospital Sant Joan de Deu where acupuncture intervention is not permitted.
- Have received acupuncture treatment in the last ten days.
- Receive concomitant abdominal radiotherapy.
- Have diarrhea on day 1 of the cycle
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Other
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Experimental
Pre-Post feasibility treatment On the first cycle of irinotecan, the patient does not receive any intervention, we only collect data. This is the control cycle. There will be a single study group that will be used at the same time as your own control. On the second cycle of irinotecan, the patient receives acupuncture. There will be a single study group that will be used at the same time as your own control. |
13 Indwelling, sterile and disposable needles (SEIRIN NEW PYONEX® from 0.9 mm in length and 0.22 mm in diameter) on day 1 and 5 of the second cycle of irinotecan leaving them inserted for 4 days.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Pain intensity during the procedure
Time Frame: Day 1
|
Evaluation of pain intensity during the insertion procedure of the indwelling needles.
The scales will be used: crying scale (0-8) (<3 years), Wong-Baker scale of faces for cooperative children (0-10) (>3 years) and numerical scale (0-10) for collaborating children (>6 years).
Higher scores mean a worse result.
|
Day 1
|
Pain intensity during the procedure
Time Frame: Day 5
|
Evaluation of pain intensity during the insertion procedure of the indwelling needles.
The scales will be used: crying scale (0-8) (<3 years), Wong-Baker scale of faces for cooperative children (0-10) (>3 years) and numerical scale (0-10) for collaborating children (>6 years).
Higher scores mean a worse result.
|
Day 5
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Pain intensity during the intervention
Time Frame: Day 1
|
Evaluation of the intensity of the pain during the days that the indwelling needles remain inserted.
It will be evaluated with the same tools as the variable major.
The scales will be used: crying scale (0-8) (<3 years), Wong-Baker scale of faces for cooperative children (0-10) (>3 years) and numerical scale (0-10) for collaborating children (>6 years).
Higher scores mean a worse result.
|
Day 1
|
Pain intensity during the intervention
Time Frame: Day 2
|
Evaluation of the intensity of the pain during the days that the indwelling needles remain inserted.
It will be evaluated with the same tools as the variable major.
The scales will be used: crying scale (0-8) (<3 years), Wong-Baker scale of faces for cooperative children (0-10) (>3 years) and numerical scale (0-10) for collaborating children (>6 years).
Higher scores mean a worse result.
|
Day 2
|
Pain intensity during the intervention
Time Frame: Day 3
|
Evaluation of the intensity of the pain during the days that the indwelling needles remain inserted.
It will be evaluated with the same tools as the variable major.
The scales will be used: crying scale (0-8) (<3 years), Wong-Baker scale of faces for cooperative children (0-10) (>3 years) and numerical scale (0-10) for collaborating children (>6 years).
Higher scores mean a worse result.
|
Day 3
|
Pain intensity during the intervention
Time Frame: Day 4
|
Evaluation of the intensity of the pain during the days that the indwelling needles remain inserted.
It will be evaluated with the same tools as the variable major.
The scales will be used: crying scale (0-8) (<3 years), Wong-Baker scale of faces for cooperative children (0-10) (>3 years) and numerical scale (0-10) for collaborating children (>6 years).
Higher scores mean a worse result.
|
Day 4
|
Pain intensity during the intervention
Time Frame: Day 5
|
Evaluation of the intensity of the pain during the days that the indwelling needles remain inserted.
It will be evaluated with the same tools as the variable major.
The scales will be used: crying scale (0-8) (<3 years), Wong-Baker scale of faces for cooperative children (0-10) (>3 years) and numerical scale (0-10) for collaborating children (>6 years).
Higher scores mean a worse result.
|
Day 5
|
Pain intensity during the intervention
Time Frame: Day 6
|
Evaluation of the intensity of the pain during the days that the indwelling needles remain inserted.
It will be evaluated with the same tools as the variable major.
The scales will be used: crying scale (0-8) (<3 years), Wong-Baker scale of faces for cooperative children (0-10) (>3 years) and numerical scale (0-10) for collaborating children (>6 years).
Higher scores mean a worse result.
|
Day 6
|
Pain intensity during the intervention
Time Frame: Day 7
|
Evaluation of the intensity of the pain during the days that the indwelling needles remain inserted.
It will be evaluated with the same tools as the variable major.
The scales will be used: crying scale (0-8) (<3 years), Wong-Baker scale of faces for cooperative children (0-10) (>3 years) and numerical scale (0-10) for collaborating children (>6 years).
Higher scores mean a worse result.
|
Day 7
|
Pain intensity during the intervention
Time Frame: Day 8
|
Evaluation of the intensity of the pain during the days that the indwelling needles remain inserted.
It will be evaluated with the same tools as the variable major.
The scales will be used: crying scale (0-8) (<3 years), Wong-Baker scale of faces for cooperative children (0-10) (>3 years) and numerical scale (0-10) for collaborating children (>6 years).
Higher scores mean a worse result.
|
Day 8
|
Pain intensity during the intervention
Time Frame: Day 9
|
Evaluation of the intensity of the pain during the days that the indwelling needles remain inserted.
It will be evaluated with the same tools as the variable major.
The scales will be used: crying scale (0-8) (<3 years), Wong-Baker scale of faces for cooperative children (0-10) (>3 years) and numerical scale (0-10) for collaborating children (>6 years).
Higher scores mean a worse result.
|
Day 9
|
Side effects
Time Frame: Day 9
|
Registry of other local adverse effects of acupuncture.
will be delivered families recorded some items on day 9 of the second cycle (intervention cycle): local infection, hematoma, and skin damage.
|
Day 9
|
Degree of severity of diarrhea
Time Frame: Day 1
|
Degree of severity of diarrhea according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0 (1-5). It will be evaluated after collection of data from the registration tables that families fill out. Higher scores mean a worse result. Grade 1: Increase of <4 stools per day over baseline. Grade 2: Increase of 4 - 6 stools per day over baseline Grade 3: Increase of >=7 stools per day over baseline; hospitalization indicated Grade 4: Life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated Grade 5: Death |
Day 1
|
Degree of severity of diarrhea
Time Frame: Day 2
|
Degree of severity of diarrhea according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0 (1-5). It will be evaluated after collection of data from the registration tables that families fill out. Higher scores mean a worse result. Grade 1: Increase of <4 stools per day over baseline. Grade 2: Increase of 4 - 6 stools per day over baseline Grade 3: Increase of >=7 stools per day over baseline; hospitalization indicated Grade 4: Life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated Grade 5: Death |
Day 2
|
Degree of severity of diarrhea
Time Frame: Day 3
|
Degree of severity of diarrhea according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0 (1-5). It will be evaluated after collection of data from the registration tables that families fill out. Higher scores mean a worse result. Grade 1: Increase of <4 stools per day over baseline. Grade 2: Increase of 4 - 6 stools per day over baseline Grade 3: Increase of >=7 stools per day over baseline; hospitalization indicated Grade 4: Life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated Grade 5: Death |
Day 3
|
Degree of severity of diarrhea
Time Frame: Day 4
|
Degree of severity of diarrhea according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0 (1-5). It will be evaluated after collection of data from the registration tables that families fill out. Higher scores mean a worse result. Grade 1: Increase of <4 stools per day over baseline. Grade 2: Increase of 4 - 6 stools per day over baseline Grade 3: Increase of >=7 stools per day over baseline; hospitalization indicated Grade 4: Life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated Grade 5: Death |
Day 4
|
Degree of severity of diarrhea
Time Frame: Day 5
|
Degree of severity of diarrhea according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0 (1-5). It will be evaluated after collection of data from the registration tables that families fill out. Higher scores mean a worse result. Grade 1: Increase of <4 stools per day over baseline. Grade 2: Increase of 4 - 6 stools per day over baseline Grade 3: Increase of >=7 stools per day over baseline; hospitalization indicated Grade 4: Life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated Grade 5: Death |
Day 5
|
Degree of severity of diarrhea
Time Frame: Day 6
|
Degree of severity of diarrhea according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0 (1-5). It will be evaluated after collection of data from the registration tables that families fill out. Higher scores mean a worse result. Grade 1: Increase of <4 stools per day over baseline. Grade 2: Increase of 4 - 6 stools per day over baseline Grade 3: Increase of >=7 stools per day over baseline; hospitalization indicated Grade 4: Life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated Grade 5: Death |
Day 6
|
Degree of severity of diarrhea
Time Frame: Day 7
|
Degree of severity of diarrhea according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0 (1-5). It will be evaluated after collection of data from the registration tables that families fill out. Higher scores mean a worse result. Grade 1: Increase of <4 stools per day over baseline. Grade 2: Increase of 4 - 6 stools per day over baseline Grade 3: Increase of >=7 stools per day over baseline; hospitalization indicated Grade 4: Life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated Grade 5: Death |
Day 7
|
Degree of severity of diarrhea
Time Frame: Day 8
|
Degree of severity of diarrhea according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0 (1-5). It will be evaluated after collection of data from the registration tables that families fill out. Higher scores mean a worse result. Grade 1: Increase of <4 stools per day over baseline. Grade 2: Increase of 4 - 6 stools per day over baseline Grade 3: Increase of >=7 stools per day over baseline; hospitalization indicated Grade 4: Life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated Grade 5: Death |
Day 8
|
Degree of severity of diarrhea
Time Frame: Day 9
|
Degree of severity of diarrhea according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0 (1-5). It will be evaluated after collection of data from the registration tables that families fill out. Higher scores mean a worse result. Grade 1: Increase of <4 stools per day over baseline. Grade 2: Increase of 4 - 6 stools per day over baseline Grade 3: Increase of >=7 stools per day over baseline; hospitalization indicated Grade 4: Life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated Grade 5: Death |
Day 9
|
Degree of severity of diarrhea
Time Frame: Day 10
|
Degree of severity of diarrhea according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0 (1-5). It will be evaluated after collection of data from the registration tables that families fill out. Higher scores mean a worse result. Grade 1: Increase of <4 stools per day over baseline. Grade 2: Increase of 4 - 6 stools per day over baseline Grade 3: Increase of >=7 stools per day over baseline; hospitalization indicated Grade 4: Life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated Grade 5: Death |
Day 10
|
Degree of severity of diarrhea
Time Frame: Day 11
|
Degree of severity of diarrhea according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0 (1-5). It will be evaluated after collection of data from the registration tables that families fill out. Higher scores mean a worse result. Grade 1: Increase of <4 stools per day over baseline. Grade 2: Increase of 4 - 6 stools per day over baseline Grade 3: Increase of >=7 stools per day over baseline; hospitalization indicated Grade 4: Life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated Grade 5: Death |
Day 11
|
Degree of severity of diarrhea
Time Frame: Day 12
|
Degree of severity of diarrhea according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0 (1-5). It will be evaluated after collection of data from the registration tables that families fill out. Higher scores mean a worse result. Grade 1: Increase of <4 stools per day over baseline. Grade 2: Increase of 4 - 6 stools per day over baseline Grade 3: Increase of >=7 stools per day over baseline; hospitalization indicated Grade 4: Life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated Grade 5: Death |
Day 12
|
Degree of severity of diarrhea
Time Frame: Day 13
|
Degree of severity of diarrhea according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0 (1-5). It will be evaluated after collection of data from the registration tables that families fill out. Higher scores mean a worse result. Grade 1: Increase of <4 stools per day over baseline. Grade 2: Increase of 4 - 6 stools per day over baseline Grade 3: Increase of >=7 stools per day over baseline; hospitalization indicated Grade 4: Life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated Grade 5: Death |
Day 13
|
Degree of severity of diarrhea
Time Frame: Day 14
|
Degree of severity of diarrhea according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0 (1-5). It will be evaluated after collection of data from the registration tables that families fill out. Higher scores mean a worse result. Grade 1: Increase of <4 stools per day over baseline. Grade 2: Increase of 4 - 6 stools per day over baseline Grade 3: Increase of >=7 stools per day over baseline; hospitalization indicated Grade 4: Life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated Grade 5: Death |
Day 14
|
Dose of antidiarrheal drugs
Time Frame: Day 1
|
Dose of antidiarrheals: the number of daily doses of loperamide (0-4 doses/day) will be recorded.
Higher scores mean a worse result.
|
Day 1
|
Dose of antidiarrheal drugs
Time Frame: Day 2
|
Dose of antidiarrheals: the number of daily doses of loperamide (0-4 doses/day) will be recorded.
Higher scores mean a worse result.
|
Day 2
|
Dose of antidiarrheal drugs
Time Frame: Day 3
|
Dose of antidiarrheals: the number of daily doses of loperamide (0-4 doses/day) will be recorded.
Higher scores mean a worse result.
|
Day 3
|
Dose of antidiarrheal drugs
Time Frame: Day 4
|
Dose of antidiarrheals: the number of daily doses of loperamide (0-4 doses/day) will be recorded.
Higher scores mean a worse result.
|
Day 4
|
Dose of antidiarrheal drugs
Time Frame: Day 5
|
Dose of antidiarrheals: the number of daily doses of loperamide (0-4 doses/day) will be recorded.
Higher scores mean a worse result.
|
Day 5
|
Dose of antidiarrheal drugs
Time Frame: Day 6
|
Dose of antidiarrheals: the number of daily doses of loperamide (0-4 doses/day) will be recorded.
Higher scores mean a worse result.
|
Day 6
|
Dose of antidiarrheal drugs
Time Frame: Day 7
|
Dose of antidiarrheals: the number of daily doses of loperamide (0-4 doses/day) will be recorded.
Higher scores mean a worse result.
|
Day 7
|
Dose of antidiarrheal drugs
Time Frame: Day 8
|
Dose of antidiarrheals: the number of daily doses of loperamide (0-4 doses/day) will be recorded.
Higher scores mean a worse result.
|
Day 8
|
Dose of antidiarrheal drugs
Time Frame: Day 9
|
Dose of antidiarrheals: the number of daily doses of loperamide (0-4 doses/day) will be recorded.
Higher scores mean a worse result.
|
Day 9
|
Dose of antidiarrheal drugs
Time Frame: Day 10
|
Dose of antidiarrheals: the number of daily doses of loperamide (0-4 doses/day) will be recorded.
Higher scores mean a worse result.
|
Day 10
|
Dose of antidiarrheal drugs
Time Frame: Day 11
|
Dose of antidiarrheals: the number of daily doses of loperamide (0-4 doses/day) will be recorded.
Higher scores mean a worse result.
|
Day 11
|
Dose of antidiarrheal drugs
Time Frame: Day 12
|
Dose of antidiarrheals: the number of daily doses of loperamide (0-4 doses/day) will be recorded.
Higher scores mean a worse result.
|
Day 12
|
Dose of antidiarrheal drugs
Time Frame: Day 13
|
Dose of antidiarrheals: the number of daily doses of loperamide (0-4 doses/day) will be recorded.
Higher scores mean a worse result.
|
Day 13
|
Dose of antidiarrheal drugs
Time Frame: Day 14
|
Dose of antidiarrheals: the number of daily doses of loperamide (0-4 doses/day) will be recorded.
Higher scores mean a worse result.
|
Day 14
|
Prophylactic regimen of cefixime
Time Frame: Day 1
|
Prophylactic regimen of cefixime before starting the cycle of irinotecan and the use of regimen prolonged 10 days.
(Yes/No)
|
Day 1
|
Abdominal pain treatment-related
Time Frame: Day 1
|
Degree of abdominal pain assessed with a visual analog scale of 0-10.
Higher scores mean a worse result.
|
Day 1
|
Abdominal pain treatment-related
Time Frame: Day 2
|
Degree of abdominal pain assessed with a visual analog scale of 0-10.
Higher scores mean a worse result.
|
Day 2
|
Abdominal pain treatment-related
Time Frame: Day 3
|
Degree of abdominal pain assessed with a visual analog scale of 0-10.
Higher scores mean a worse result.
|
Day 3
|
Abdominal pain treatment-related
Time Frame: Day 4
|
Degree of abdominal pain assessed with a visual analog scale of 0-10.
Higher scores mean a worse result.
|
Day 4
|
Abdominal pain treatment-related
Time Frame: Day 5
|
Degree of abdominal pain assessed with a visual analog scale of 0-10.
Higher scores mean a worse result.
|
Day 5
|
Abdominal pain treatment-related
Time Frame: Day 6
|
Degree of abdominal pain assessed with a visual analog scale of 0-10.
Higher scores mean a worse result.
|
Day 6
|
Abdominal pain treatment-related
Time Frame: Day 7
|
Degree of abdominal pain assessed with a visual analog scale of 0-10.
Higher scores mean a worse result.
|
Day 7
|
Abdominal pain treatment-related
Time Frame: Day 8
|
Degree of abdominal pain assessed with a visual analog scale of 0-10.
Higher scores mean a worse result.
|
Day 8
|
Abdominal pain treatment-related
Time Frame: Day 9
|
Degree of abdominal pain assessed with a visual analog scale of 0-10.
Higher scores mean a worse result.
|
Day 9
|
Abdominal pain treatment-related
Time Frame: Day 10
|
Degree of abdominal pain assessed with a visual analog scale of 0-10.
Higher scores mean a worse result.
|
Day 10
|
Abdominal pain treatment-related
Time Frame: Day 11
|
Degree of abdominal pain assessed with a visual analog scale of 0-10.
Higher scores mean a worse result.
|
Day 11
|
Abdominal pain treatment-related
Time Frame: Day 12
|
Degree of abdominal pain assessed with a visual analog scale of 0-10.
Higher scores mean a worse result.
|
Day 12
|
Abdominal pain treatment-related
Time Frame: Day 13
|
Degree of abdominal pain assessed with a visual analog scale of 0-10.
Higher scores mean a worse result.
|
Day 13
|
Abdominal pain treatment-related
Time Frame: Day 14
|
Degree of abdominal pain assessed with a visual analog scale of 0-10.
Higher scores mean a worse result.
|
Day 14
|
Satisfaction degree
Time Frame: Day 15
|
Degree of satisfaction with acupuncture through a qualitative survey.
Three items Yes/No and free comments
|
Day 15
|
Determination of the UGT1A1 polymorphism
Time Frame: Day 1
|
Determination of the UGT1A1 polymorphism by blood sample in the analysis of routine performed on day 1 of the first cycle of irinotecan (control cycle).
|
Day 1
|
Nausea
Time Frame: Day 1
|
Record whether or not the patient has nausea (YES/NO)
|
Day 1
|
Nausea
Time Frame: Day 2
|
Record whether or not the patient has nausea (YES/NO)
|
Day 2
|
Nausea
Time Frame: Day 3
|
Record whether or not the patient has nausea (YES/NO)
|
Day 3
|
Nausea
Time Frame: Day 4
|
Record whether or not the patient has nausea (YES/NO)
|
Day 4
|
Nausea
Time Frame: Day 5
|
Record whether or not the patient has nausea (YES/NO)
|
Day 5
|
Nausea
Time Frame: Day 6
|
Record whether or not the patient has nausea (YES/NO)
|
Day 6
|
Nausea
Time Frame: Day 7
|
Record whether or not the patient has nausea (YES/NO)
|
Day 7
|
Nausea
Time Frame: Day 8
|
Record whether or not the patient has nausea (YES/NO)
|
Day 8
|
Nausea
Time Frame: Day 9
|
Record whether or not the patient has nausea (YES/NO)
|
Day 9
|
Nausea
Time Frame: Day 10
|
Record whether or not the patient has nausea (YES/NO)
|
Day 10
|
Nausea
Time Frame: Day 11
|
Record whether or not the patient has nausea (YES/NO)
|
Day 11
|
Nausea
Time Frame: Day 12
|
Record whether or not the patient has nausea (YES/NO)
|
Day 12
|
Nausea
Time Frame: Day 13
|
Record whether or not the patient has nausea (YES/NO)
|
Day 13
|
Nausea
Time Frame: Day 14
|
Record whether or not the patient has nausea (YES/NO)
|
Day 14
|
Vomiting
Time Frame: Day 1
|
Record whether or not the patient has vomiting (YES/NO)
|
Day 1
|
Vomiting
Time Frame: Day 2
|
Record whether or not the patient has vomiting (YES/NO)
|
Day 2
|
Vomiting
Time Frame: Day 3
|
Record whether or not the patient has vomiting (YES/NO)
|
Day 3
|
Vomiting
Time Frame: Day 4
|
Record whether or not the patient has vomiting (YES/NO)
|
Day 4
|
Vomiting
Time Frame: Day 5
|
Record whether or not the patient has vomiting (YES/NO)
|
Day 5
|
Vomiting
Time Frame: Day 6
|
Record whether or not the patient has vomiting (YES/NO)
|
Day 6
|
Vomiting
Time Frame: Day 7
|
Record whether or not the patient has vomiting (YES/NO)
|
Day 7
|
Vomiting
Time Frame: Day 8
|
Record whether or not the patient has vomiting (YES/NO)
|
Day 8
|
Vomiting
Time Frame: Day 9
|
Record whether or not the patient has vomiting (YES/NO)
|
Day 9
|
Vomiting
Time Frame: Day 10
|
Record whether or not the patient has vomiting (YES/NO)
|
Day 10
|
Vomiting
Time Frame: Day 11
|
Record whether or not the patient has vomiting (YES/NO)
|
Day 11
|
Vomiting
Time Frame: Day 12
|
Record whether or not the patient has vomiting (YES/NO)
|
Day 12
|
Vomiting
Time Frame: Day 13
|
Record whether or not the patient has vomiting (YES/NO)
|
Day 13
|
Vomiting
Time Frame: Day 14
|
Record whether or not the patient has vomiting (YES/NO)
|
Day 14
|
Dose of antiemetic drugs (ondasentron)
Time Frame: Day 1
|
Dose of antidiarrheals: the number of daily doses of ondasentron (0-4 doses/day) will be recorded.
Higher scores mean a worse result.
|
Day 1
|
Dose of antiemetic drugs (ondasentron)
Time Frame: Day 2
|
Dose of antidiarrheals: the number of daily doses of ondasentron (0-4 doses/day) will be recorded.
Higher scores mean a worse result.
|
Day 2
|
Dose of antiemetic drugs (ondasentron)
Time Frame: Day 3
|
Dose of antidiarrheals: the number of daily doses of ondasentron (0-4 doses/day) will be recorded.
Higher scores mean a worse result.
|
Day 3
|
Dose of antiemetic drugs (ondasentron)
Time Frame: Day 4
|
Dose of antidiarrheals: the number of daily doses of ondasentron (0-4 doses/day) will be recorded.
Higher scores mean a worse result.
|
Day 4
|
Dose of antiemetic drugs (ondasentron)
Time Frame: Day 5
|
Dose of antidiarrheals: the number of daily doses of ondasentron (0-4 doses/day) will be recorded.
Higher scores mean a worse result.
|
Day 5
|
Dose of antiemetic drugs (ondasentron)
Time Frame: Day 6
|
Dose of antidiarrheals: the number of daily doses of ondasentron (0-4 doses/day) will be recorded.
Higher scores mean a worse result.
|
Day 6
|
Dose of antiemetic drugs (ondasentron)
Time Frame: Day 7
|
Dose of antidiarrheals: the number of daily doses of ondasentron (0-4 doses/day) will be recorded.
Higher scores mean a worse result.
|
Day 7
|
Dose of antiemetic drugs (ondasentron)
Time Frame: Day 8
|
Dose of antidiarrheals: the number of daily doses of ondasentron (0-4 doses/day) will be recorded.
Higher scores mean a worse result.
|
Day 8
|
Dose of antiemetic drugs (ondasentron)
Time Frame: Day 9
|
Dose of antidiarrheals: the number of daily doses of ondasentron (0-4 doses/day) will be recorded.
Higher scores mean a worse result.
|
Day 9
|
Dose of antiemetic drugs (ondasentron)
Time Frame: Day 10
|
Dose of antidiarrheals: the number of daily doses of ondasentron (0-4 doses/day) will be recorded.
Higher scores mean a worse result.
|
Day 10
|
Dose of antiemetic drugs (ondasentron)
Time Frame: Day 11
|
Dose of antidiarrheals: the number of daily doses of ondasentron (0-4 doses/day) will be recorded.
Higher scores mean a worse result.
|
Day 11
|
Dose of antiemetic drugs (ondasentron)
Time Frame: Day 12
|
Dose of antidiarrheals: the number of daily doses of ondasentron (0-4 doses/day) will be recorded.
Higher scores mean a worse result.
|
Day 12
|
Dose of antiemetic drugs (ondasentron)
Time Frame: Day 13
|
Dose of antidiarrheals: the number of daily doses of ondasentron (0-4 doses/day) will be recorded.
Higher scores mean a worse result.
|
Day 13
|
Dose of antiemetic drugs (ondasentron)
Time Frame: Day 14
|
Dose of antidiarrheals: the number of daily doses of ondasentron (0-4 doses/day) will be recorded.
Higher scores mean a worse result.
|
Day 14
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Esther Martinez, MD, Hospital Sant Joan de Déu
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- PS-20-21
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Solid Tumor
-
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterRecruitingSolid Tumor | Solid Tumor, Adult | Solid Tumor, Unspecified, AdultUnited States
-
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterLincoln Medical and Mental Health CenterRecruitingSolid Tumor | Solid Tumor, Adult | Solid Tumor, Unspecified, AdultUnited States, Puerto Rico
-
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterLincoln Medical and Mental Health CenterRecruitingSolid Tumor | Solid Tumor, Adult | Solid Tumor, Unspecified, AdultUnited States, Puerto Rico
-
Sorrento Therapeutics, Inc.WithdrawnSolid Tumor | Relapsed Solid Tumor | Refractory Tumor
-
RemeGen Co., Ltd.CompletedMetastatic Solid Tumor | Locally Advanced Solid Tumor | Unresectable Solid TumorAustralia
-
Aadi Bioscience, Inc.RecruitingAdvanced Solid Tumor | Tumor | Tumor, SolidUnited States
-
Impact Therapeutics, Inc.RecruitingSolid Tumor | Advanced Solid TumorChina, Taiwan, United States, Australia
-
Partner Therapeutics, Inc.WithdrawnSolid Tumor | Solid Tumor, AdultUnited States
-
Shenzhen Ionova Life Sciences Co., Ltd.Merck Sharp & Dohme LLCRecruitingCancer | Solid Tumor, Adult | Solid Carcinoma | Solid Tumor, Unspecified, Adult | Cancer Metastatic | Tumor, SolidUnited States
-
Pyxis Oncology, IncRecruiting
Clinical Trials on Acupuncture
-
Federal University of São PauloCompleted
-
University of ZurichCharite University, Berlin, Germany; First Teaching Hospital of Tianjin University...CompletedExperimental Dental PainSwitzerland
-
University of SkövdeCompleted
-
National Research Centre of Complementary and Alternative...Norwegian Acupuncture CollegeUnknown
-
Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese MedicineChongqing Medical University; Hunan University of Traditional Chinese MedicineCompletedFunctional Dyspepsia | Postprandial Distress SyndromeChina
-
Chang Gung Memorial HospitalRecruitingIntracranial HemorrhagesTaiwan
-
University of MichiganMassachusetts General Hospital; National Center for Complementary and Integrative...Completed
-
University Medicine GreifswaldRecruitingGagging During Transesophageal EchocardiographyGermany
-
Huazhong University of Science and TechnologyThe University of Hong Kong; Heilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine; Hubei...CompletedPolycystic Ovary SyndromeChina
-
China Medical University HospitalNot yet recruiting