BCT-HA Kit for Dehydrated and Wrinkled Skin

August 14, 2023 updated by: University of Minnesota

Feasibility Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Cellular MAtrix™ BCT-HA Kit as a New Treatment Option for Dehydrated and Wrinkled Skin (A Clinical and Histological Evaluation)

This study will assess the efficacy of Cellular MatrixTM BCT-HA Kit treatment compared to placebo condition on revitalization and skin rejuvenation on the midface. Particular attention will be made to the safety aspects, as well as the histological consequences of treatment.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

65

Phase

  • Early Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Minnesota
      • Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States, 55455
        • University of Minnesota

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

30 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects who are able to give voluntary, written informed consent to participate in this study and from whom consent has been obtained including HIPPA Authorization
  • Healthy men and women, ages 30 - 65 years of age
  • Subjects with Fitzpatrick photo skin type I-VI
  • Subjects with moderate to severe nasolabial folds contour deficiencies or other facial wrinkles. Degree of nasolabial folds or other facial wrinkles will be determined on the basis of the Wrinkles Severity Rating Scale
  • Subjects who agree not to have any other procedures of affecting skin quality (microdermabrasion, peels, acne treatments, toxin, fillers etc.) for the duration of the study
  • Subjects who understand the study and are able to follow study instructions and are willing to attend the required study visits.
  • Subjects who agree to be photographed for research purposes and their identity may not be concealed in these photographs.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects who have had any kind of aesthetic therapy (peeling, laser, ultrasound, toxins, fillers) in the facial area during the last 6 months
  • Presence of implant in the facial area to treat
  • Contraindications to the use of antiseptics (Biseptine, Amukine)
  • Subjects who have an active or known skin inflammation or infection within the treatment area.
  • Subjects who have an active or known acute skin allergies
  • Subjects who have a known allergy to hyaluronic acid
  • Subjects who have any other dermatologic conditions including acne, rosacea, eczema, psoriasis, actinic keratosis, severe sun damage, infection, or scars within the treatment area.
  • Subjects of child-bearing potential who are not using an approved method of birth control (oral contraceptives, IUD, contraceptive implant, barrier methods with spermicide or abstinence). Females of non-childbearing potential are defined as post-menopausal (absence of menstrual bleeding for one year), hysterectomy, or bilateral oophorectomy.
  • Subjects who are pregnant, planning to become pregnant or breastfeeding. A urine pregnancy test will be done to rule out pregnancy.
  • Subjects who have been diagnosed with diabetes
  • Subjects who are Immunosuppressed
  • Subjects who are HIV+ / VHB+ / VHC+
  • Subjects who have had/will have a COVID vaccine within 2 weeks of study participation
  • Subjects who have had/will have a dental procedure within 4 weeks of study participation
  • Subjects with a history of severe bee allergy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
saline solution
Neither PRP nor hyaluronic acid
Experimental: combined HA with PRP
Hyaluronic acid and PRP combination treatment
Injections with platelet-rich plasma and hyaluronic acid
Active Comparator: PRP
Platelet rich plasma without hyaluronic acid
platelet rich plasma without hyaluronic acid

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Skin Quality Rating Scale
Time Frame: Week 32
Skin Quality Rating Scale is a 10 point scales used to assess skin quality, including radiance, smoothness, pigmentation, erythema, and pore size.
Week 32
Change in Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale
Time Frame: Week 32
This is a 7 point scale to assess degree of improvement of facial skin after treatment.
Week 32
Change in FACE-Q Score
Time Frame: Week 32
The following eight FACE-Q scales: (1) satisfaction with overall facial appearance (measures patient satisfaction with the overall appearance of their face); (2) satisfaction with decision (measures patient satisfaction with their decision to undergo the procedure;(3) cheekbones; (4) chin; (5) cheeks; (6) lower face; (7) jawline; and (8) nasolabial folds (items 3 through 8 measure overall and area-specific appearance appraisal to evaluate satisfaction with specific facial areas). Higher FACE-Q scores indicate superior satisfaction
Week 32
Physician's Global assessment to measure quality of life
Time Frame: 4 weeks after treatment 1st, 2nd and 3rd treatments and 32 weeks after enrollment
Patient rating of improvement in treated area ranging from 1 to 5, with 5 being worse.
4 weeks after treatment 1st, 2nd and 3rd treatments and 32 weeks after enrollment
Visual Analog Score for patients
Time Frame: Immediately after 1st, 2nd and 3rd treatments
Visual analog rating of pain associated with treatment administration ranging between 0 and 10, pain scale.
Immediately after 1st, 2nd and 3rd treatments
Wrinkle assessment
Time Frame: Week 32
Wrinkle Assessment Score is a 9 point scale to asses severity of wrinkles.
Week 32

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Maria Hordinsky, MD, University of Minnesota

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 10, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

January 31, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

January 31, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 25, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 23, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

August 24, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 15, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 14, 2023

Last Verified

August 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • DERM-2021-30292

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Wrinkle

Clinical Trials on Cellular Matrix TM BCT-HA Kit (ref. BCT-HA-3)

3
Subscribe