- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05514860
The Impact of "First-Line" Rhythm Therapy on AF Progression (PROGRESSIVE-AF)
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Project Aim: Atrial fibrillation is a major burden to healthcare systems. Contemporary costs of managing AF have been estimated to be up to 2.7% of total annual healthcare expenditures. A significant proportion of these expenses result from the direct costs associated with hospitalization and acute care. The CANet funded EARLY-AF Study aimed to determine whether EARLY invasive intervention resulted in a significant (i.e. >20%) reduction in arrhythmia recurrence and health care utilisation at one year of follow-up. The PROGRESSIVE AF study aims to evaluate the long-term effect of EARLY invasive intervention on disease progression and health care utilisation.
Project Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a chronic progressive disease characterized by exacerbations and remissions. Early on, AF is triggered by one or more ectopic foci in the atria and is perpetuated via micro re-entrant circuits in the atrial body or at the pulmonary venous-left atrial junction. With recurrent episodes the atria undergoes electrical, contractile, and structural remodelling resulting in a greater predisposition toward sustained arrhythmia. This results in the progression of incidental and paroxysmal (self-terminating) AF to persistent (AF requiring intervention for termination) and eventually permanent AF (recurrent AF of >1 year in duration for which cardioversion was unsuccessful). While anti-arrhythmic drugs (AADs) remain the "first-line" therapy, these medications have only modest efficacy at maintaining sinus rhythm over the long term. Moreover, these agents are associated with significant non-cardiac side-effects (e.g. heart failure or organ toxicity), as well as the potential for pro-arrhythmia (i.e. increased propensity towards malignant arrhythmias). Conversely, multiple randomized controlled trials have demonstrated that catheter ablation is superior to drug therapy in maintaining sinus rhythm when AADs have been ineffective, are contra-indicated or cannot be tolerated.
While the evidence to date has demonstrated the universal superiority of ablation over AAD therapy, these studies have focused on medically refractory patients with more advanced forms of AF. While it has been postulated that early invasive intervention with catheter ablation may be beneficial, this assertion remains only hypothesis generating. As such we undertook the CANet funded EARLY-AF program. This multicenter collaboration sought to determine if an early invasive approach centered on cryoballoon based PVI was associated with a significant (i.e. >20%) reduction in arrhythmia episodes, AF symptoms, and healthcare utilization at one year of follow-up (i.e. the standard definition of success, as advocated by the Heart Rhythm Society).
In recent years attention has turned to longer-term effectiveness and safety outcomes, focusing more on the durability of catheter ablation procedures. Given that catheter ablation is being offered to relatively young and otherwise healthy patients as a first-line treatment approach, a comprehensive assessment of long-term clinical effectiveness is of particular importance with respect to informed decision-making. Moreover, a comprehensive understanding of the downstream effects of ablation greatly informs the evaluation of the cost-effectiveness of invasive AF ablation procedures.
The PROGRESSIVE AF project aims to leverage the infrastructure established with the EARLY-AF study to determine whether an a first-line invasive approach can alter the progressive pathoanatomical changes associated with AF, and by extension alter the disease trajectory (i.e. reduction in progression to persistent AF). The purpose of the current application is to undertake a 3 year follow-up study in order to better understand: 1) the natural history of AF (e.g. disease progression), 2) the relative ability of the two "first-line" treatment approaches to alter disease progression (e.g. AAD vs. pulmonary vein isolation), 3) the longer-term healthcare utilization associated with these two first-line treatment approaches, 4) the longer-term impact of these first-line approaches on patient reported outcomes.
Project Hypothesis, Research Question(s) and Objectives:
The majority of studies demonstrating the superiority of catheter ablation over anti-arrhythmic drug therapy have focused on medically refractory patients. This design pre-selects a group in whom medical therapy has been proven to be an ineffective therapy, and weights the benefit significantly towards the ablation arm. To date it is unknown whether the benefit of catheter ablation will be as substantial when delivered prior to medication failure (i.e. as a "first-line" ablation strategy). Moreover, it is unknown whether "first-line" ablation can alter the natural history of atrial fibrillation.
Project Hypothesis: We hypothesize that early intervention with the cryoballoon as a "first-line" therapy will favourably alter the natural history of AF when compared to an approach of "first-line" antiarrhythmic drug therapy. Specifically, we hypothesize that "first-line" ablation will result in increased freedom from recurrent arrhythmia, reduced need for pharmacologic or invasive intervention, reduced hospital utilisation due to symptoms caused by documented atrial arrhythmias, as well as a reduced progression from paroxysmal to persistent or permanent AF.
Objectives: The study is designed to evaluate of the impact of the early invasive management of AF with the Arctic Front cryoballoon. The primary objective of the study is to evaluate whether a "first-line" ablation strategy can reduce the progression from paroxysmal to persistent AF over ~36 months of follow-up, as detected by continuous cardiac monitoring. The secondary objective of the study is to evaluate the burden of AF on follow-up, as well as the health related quality of life (HRQOL) impact associated with early invasive intervention, in comparison to primary AAD therapy. This analysis will be centered on an evaluation of generic and disease-specific HRQOL instruments in order to determine the impact of an early invasive approach. The tertiary objective of the study is to evaluate the economic impact of early invasive intervention, with a focus on healthcare utilization. These will be used to derive a summary measure of health outcome and to inform subsequent healthcare resource allocation decisions.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Alberta
-
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Libin CV
-
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
- Royal Alexandra
-
-
British Columbia
-
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Vancouver General
-
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- St Paul'S Hospital
-
Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
- Royal Jubillee
-
-
Nova Scotia
-
Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
- QE II
-
-
Ontario
-
Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Hamilton Health Sciences
-
Kitchener, Ontario, Canada
- St. Mary's
-
London, Ontario, Canada
- LHSC
-
Newmarket, Ontario, Canada
- Southlake
-
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Ottawa Hospital
-
Scarborough, Ontario, Canada
- Rouge Valley
-
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- St. Michael's
-
-
Quebec
-
Montréal, Quebec, Canada
- McGill
-
Montréal, Quebec, Canada
- Sacré-Coeur
-
Québec, Quebec, Canada
- Laval
-
Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada
- CHUS Le Centre hospitalier universitaire de Sherbrooke
-
-
Saskatchewan
-
Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
- U Saskatchewan
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Non-permanent AF documented on a 12 lead ECG, Trans Telephonic Monitoring (TTM) or Holter monitor within the last 24 months
- Age of 18 years or older on the date of consent
- Candidate for ablation based on AF that is symptomatic
- Informed Consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- Regular (daily) use of a class 1 or 3 antiarrhythmic drug (pill-in-the-pocket AAD use is permitted) at sufficient therapeutic doses according to guidelines (flecainide >50 mg BID, sotalol >80 mg BID, propafenone >150 mg BID Previous left atrial (LA) ablation or LA surgery
- AF due to reversible cause (e.g. hyperthyroidism, cardiothoracic surgery)
- Active Intracardiac Thrombus
- Pre-existing pulmonary vein stenosis or PV stent
- Pre-existing hemidiaphragmatic paralysis
- Contraindication to anticoagulation or radiocontrast materials
- Left atrial anteroposterior diameter greater than 5.5 cm by transthoracic echocardiography
- Cardiac valve prosthesis
- Clinically significant (moderately-severe, or severe) mitral valve regurgitation or stenosis
- Myocardial infarction, PCI / PTCA, or coronary artery stenting during the 3-month period preceding the consent date
- Cardiac surgery during the three-month interval preceding the consent date
- Significant congenital heart defect (including atrial septal defects or PV abnormalities but not including PFO)
- NYHA class III or IV congestive heart failure
- Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) less than 35%
- Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (septal or posterior wall thickness >1.5 cm)
- Significant Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD - eGFR <30 µMol/L)
- Uncontrolled hyperthyroidism
- Cerebral ischemic event (strokes or TIAs) during the six-month interval preceding the consent date
- Pregnancy
- Life expectancy less than one (1) year
- Currently participating or anticipated to participate in any other clinical trial of a drug, device or biologic that has the potential to interfere with the results of this study
- Unwilling or unable to comply fully with study procedures and follow-up
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: Cryoballoon-based PVI
Sinus rhythm control via a pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) ("first-line") procedure utilizing the the Arctic Front Cryoballoon Procedure.
|
Patients randomized to first-line cryoballoon (CB) ablation will have the pulmonary vein isolation procedure performed according to standard clinical practice using the Arctic Front Cryoballoon ablation catheter.
No anti-arrhythmic drugs will be prescribed in this arm.
|
Active Comparator: Anti-Arrhythmic Drug Therapy
Sinus rhythm control via the use of anti-arrhythmic drug (AAD) therapy ("first-line") based on local clinical practice, and according to guideline-suggested drug management for symptomatic patients with paroxysmal AF.
|
Antiarrhythmic drug therapy (Class I - flecainide, propafenone; Class III - sotalol, dronedarone) will prescribed and monitored based on local clinical practice, and according to guideline-suggested drug management for symptomatic patients with paroxysmal AF.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Time to First Occurrence of Persistent Atrial Tachyarrhythmia
Time Frame: Between 91 days following treatment initiation to final follow-up (~36 months)
|
time to first occurrence of symptomatic or asymptomatic persistent atrial tachyarrhythmia (atrial fibrillation [AF], atrial flutter [AFL], or atrial tachycardia [AT]), as defined as the first occurrence of a continuous atrial tachyarrhythmia episode lasting ≥ 7 days in duration, or lasting 48 hours to 7 days in duration but requiring cardioversion for termination, as documented by implantable loop recorder.
|
Between 91 days following treatment initiation to final follow-up (~36 months)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Atrial Fibrillation Burden
Time Frame: Treatment initiation to final follow-up (~36 months)
|
Percentage time in atrial fibrillation
|
Treatment initiation to final follow-up (~36 months)
|
Health Related Quality of Life
Time Frame: Baseline, 12, 24, and 36 months following treatment initiation
|
Change in disease-specific AFEQT score, and Generic EQ-5D score from baseline
|
Baseline, 12, 24, and 36 months following treatment initiation
|
Symptom Status
Time Frame: Baseline, 12, 24, and 36 months following treatment initiation
|
Number of participants free from symptoms attributable to atrial fibrillation
|
Baseline, 12, 24, and 36 months following treatment initiation
|
Healthcare utilisation
Time Frame: Treatment initiation to final follow-up (~36 months)
|
Number of participants experiencing an emergency department visit, cardioversion, and hospitalization >24 hours in a healthcare facility
|
Treatment initiation to final follow-up (~36 months)
|
Non-Protocol Ablation Procedure
Time Frame: Treatment initiation to final follow-up (~36 months)
|
Number of patients experiencing a repeat ablation procedures in those randomized to first line catheter ablation, or any ablation procedure performed in patients randomized to AAD therapy
|
Treatment initiation to final follow-up (~36 months)
|
Safety Outcomes related to Ablation or AAD therapy
Time Frame: Treatment initiation to final follow-up (~36 months)
|
Number of patients experiencing a major complication of ablation, or significant adverse drug events (death, ventricular pro-arrhythmia, syncope, hypotension, pacemaker insertion).
|
Treatment initiation to final follow-up (~36 months)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Jason Andrade, Vancouver General Hospital
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- H16-00617_SRG-15-P15-001
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Atrial Fibrillation
-
Ablacon, Inc.CompletedArrhythmias, Cardiac | Atrial Fibrillation, Persistent | Persistent Atrial Fibrillation | Longstanding Persistent Atrial FibrillationGermany
-
Ablacon, Inc.RecruitingAtrial Fibrillation | Arrhythmias, Cardiac | Arrhythmia | Atrial Flutter | Atrial Fibrillation, Persistent | Atrial Tachycardia | Atrial Arrhythmia | Atrial Fibrillation Paroxysmal | Atrial Fibrillation, Paroxysmal or PersistentUnited States, Belgium, Netherlands, Czechia
-
Barts & The London NHS TrustAtriCure, Inc.Not yet recruitingAtrial Fibrillation, Persistent | Persistent Atrial Fibrillation | Atrial Arrhythmia | Atrium; FibrillationUnited Kingdom
-
AtriCure, Inc.Active, not recruitingPersistent Atrial Fibrillation | Atrial Fibrillation (AF) | Longstanding Persistent Atrial FibrillationUnited States
-
Maastricht University Medical CenterRWTH Aachen UniversityUnknownAtrial Fibrillation (Paroxysmal) | Atrial Fibrillation Recurrent | Atrial Fibrillation Common Gene VariantsNetherlands
-
Adagio MedicalRecruitingAtrial Fibrillation | Atrial Flutter | Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation | Persistent Atrial FibrillationNetherlands, Germany, Belgium
-
Vivek ReddyEnrolling by invitationAtrial Fibrillation and Flutter | Atrial Flutter Typical | Atrial Fibrillation, Paroxysmal or PersistentUnited States
-
Abbott Medical DevicesRecruitingAtrial Fibrillation | Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation | Persistent Atrial Fibrillation | Atrial ArrhythmiaUnited States, Spain, Belgium, Australia, Germany, Netherlands, France, Austria, Canada, Czechia, Italy, United Kingdom
-
Fundació Institut de Recerca de l'Hospital de la...RecruitingAtrial Arrhythmia | Atrial Fibrillation and Flutter | Atrial Fibrillation RecurrentSpain
-
Beijing Anzhen HospitalJohnson & Johnson; Heart Health Research CenterNot yet recruitingParoxysmal Atrial Fibrillation | Persistent Atrial Fibrillation
Clinical Trials on Cryoballoon-based PVI
-
Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital BernUniversity Hospital, Basel, SwitzerlandActive, not recruitingParoxysmal Atrial FibrillationSwitzerland
-
University of UtahMedtronicWithdrawnAtrial Fibrillation | Left Atrial Fibrosis
-
Dignity Health Medical FoundationBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center; Brigham and Women's Hospital; St. Luke's... and other collaboratorsActive, not recruitingPersistent Atrial FibrillationUnited States
-
University of Texas Southwestern Medical CenterMedtronicCompletedAtrial FibrillationUnited States
-
Herz-Zentrums Bad KrozingenBoston Scientific Corporation; CryoCath Technologies Inc.UnknownAtrial Fibrillation AblationGermany
-
Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital BernUniversity of BernActive, not recruiting
-
Uppsala University HospitalCompleted
-
Pomeranian Medical University SzczecinCompletedAutonomic Nervous System | Catheter Ablation | Vagal Nerve Stimulation
-
Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital NHS Foundation...Medtronic International Trading SarlCompletedAtrial Flutter TypicalUnited Kingdom, Switzerland
-
Maastricht UniversityRecruitingHeart Failure | Atrial Fibrillation | Heart Failure, Systolic | Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection FractionNetherlands