Effects of a Scapular-focused Exercise Protocol

August 23, 2022 updated by: Ricardo Matias, NOVA School of Science and Technology ı FCT NOVA

Effects of a Scapular-focused Exercise Protocol for Patients With Rotator Cuff Related Pain Syndrome - a Randomized Clinical Trial

Background: Current clinical practice still lacks consistent evidence in the physiotherapy management of Rotator cuff related pain syndrome (RCS). The purpose of this trial was to compare the effectiveness of a scapular-focused treatment with and without real-time electromyographic biofeedback (EMGBF) to a control therapy in patients with RCS.

Methods: 60 patients with RCS were divided into three groups: scapular-focused exercise protocol group (P_G n=20), scapular-focused exercise protocol with EMGBF group (P+EMGBF_G n=20) and control therapy group (CT_G n=20). Values of pain and function [Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) questionnaire, complemented by the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire], scapular stabilizer neuromuscular control (SSNC), scapular stabilizer activation onset (SSAO), dynamic scapular alignment, range of motion (ROM) and glenohumeral flexor and abductor muscle strength (GMS) were assessed at baseline and after 6-weeks and compared within and between groups.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

In order to advance the understanding of the value of scapular-focused exercise for rotator cuff related syndrome, a new trial was designed with the main objective of comparing pain and function outcomes between three different treatment protocols for patients with RCS:

P_G - Scapular-focused exercise protocol without electromyographic biofeedback (EMGBF) P+EMGBF_G - Scapular-focused exercise protocol supported by real-time EMGBF CT_G - Control therapy group with manual therapy (glenohumeral joint physiologic and accessory mobilization) , massage to reduce upper trapezius (UT) stiffness, and shoulder rotation strengthening into external rotation Every outcomes was assessed at the beginning of treatment, and then, weekly until completed 6 weeks of treatment.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Viseu, Portugal, 3500
        • Policlínica de Sátão

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 60 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

1- age between 18 and 60 years; 2 - primary complaint of shoulder pain 3 - RCS clinical diagnosis

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. - neurological symptoms;
  2. - positive thoracic outlet syndrome (screened with Allen's and Adson's tests);
  3. - history of shoulder surgery or fracture;
  4. - structural injuries confirmed by imaging (e.g. ligaments and labrum);
  5. - symptoms reproduced by cervical examination;
  6. - unable to commit to scheduled treatments;
  7. - Anti-inflammatory drug use

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Scapular-focused exercise protocol supported by real-time EMGBF
The scapular-focused exercise protocol followed the protocol described by dos Santos et al. (2021). The protocol uses sequential stages of motor relearning (cognitive, associative, and autonomous) as a framework, while promoting the integration of local and global muscle function in weekly sessions divided into three phases. The main purpose of the protocol is to increase scapular neuromuscular activity and control.
manual and exercise therapy
Scapular-focused exercises, based on the dos Santos et al (2021) protocol
Experimental: Scapular-focused exercise protocol without EMGBF
The same protocol described above was applied without EMGBF
manual and exercise therapy
Scapular-focused exercises, based on the dos Santos et al (2021) protocol with the aid of the electromyographic biofeedback
Other: Control therapy group
The control therapy group underwent conservative physical therapy, which included both manual and exercise therapy
Scapular-focused exercises, based on the dos Santos et al (2021) protocol
Scapular-focused exercises, based on the dos Santos et al (2021) protocol with the aid of the electromyographic biofeedback

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
NPRS numeric pain rating scale
Time Frame: At the initial assessment
From zero (better score) to 10 (worst score)
At the initial assessment
NPRS numeric pain rating scale
Time Frame: At 6 weeks after the treatment protocol (final assessment)
From zero (better score) to 10 (worst score)
At 6 weeks after the treatment protocol (final assessment)
SPADI shoulder pain and disability index
Time Frame: At the initial assessment
From zero (better score) to 100 (worst score)
At the initial assessment
SPADI shoulder pain and disability index
Time Frame: At 6 weeks after the treatment protocol (final assessment)
From zero (better score) to 100 (worst score)
At 6 weeks after the treatment protocol (final assessment)
DASH disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand
Time Frame: At the initial assessment
From zero (better score) to 100 (worst score)
At the initial assessment
DASH disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand
Time Frame: At 6 weeks after the treatment protocol (final assessment)
From zero (better score) to 100 (worst score)
At 6 weeks after the treatment protocol (final assessment)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
scapular stabilizer neuromuscular control
Time Frame: At the initial assessment
Electromyographic Biofeedback (EMGBF) PhysiopluxTM system version 1.06
At the initial assessment
scapular stabilizer neuromuscular control
Time Frame: At 6 weeks after the treatment protocol (final assessment)
Electromyographic Biofeedback (EMGBF) PhysiopluxTM system version 1.06
At 6 weeks after the treatment protocol (final assessment)
scapular stabilizer activation onset
Time Frame: At the initial assessment
Electromyographic Biofeedback (EMGBF) PhysiopluxTM system version 1.06
At the initial assessment
scapular stabilizer activation onset
Time Frame: At 6 weeks after the treatment protocol (final assessment)
Electromyographic Biofeedback (EMGBF) PhysiopluxTM system version 1.06
At 6 weeks after the treatment protocol (final assessment)
dynamic scapular alignment
Time Frame: At the initial assessment
Observation of the medial and the inferior prominences of the scapula
At the initial assessment
dynamic scapular alignment
Time Frame: At 6 weeks after the treatment protocol (final assessment)
Observation of the medial and the inferior prominences of the scapula
At 6 weeks after the treatment protocol (final assessment)
range of motion
Time Frame: At the initial assessment
Goniometry
At the initial assessment
range of motion
Time Frame: At 6 weeks after the treatment protocol (final assessment)
Goniometry
At 6 weeks after the treatment protocol (final assessment)
glenohumeral flexor and abductor muscle strength
Time Frame: At the initial assessment
Manual Testing From 0 (worst) to 5 (normal)
At the initial assessment
glenohumeral flexor and abductor muscle strength
Time Frame: At 6 weeks after the treatment protocol (final assessment)
Manual Testing From 0 (worst) to 5 (normal)
At 6 weeks after the treatment protocol (final assessment)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Isabel Almeida, MsC, Superior School of Health os Setúbal

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 9, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 9, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

July 25, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 11, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 23, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

August 25, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 25, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 23, 2022

Last Verified

August 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Rotator Cuff Syndrome of Shoulder and Allied Disorders

Clinical Trials on Control Therapy

3
Subscribe