The Evaluation of a Preanaesthesia Assessment Clinic

November 1, 2022 updated by: Eirunn Wallevik Kristoffersen, University of Agder

The Evaluation of a Preoperative Anaesthesia Assessment Clinic on Elective Patients After Partial Excision of the Intestine

International evidence highlights the preanaesthetic assessment clinics (PAC) as a system of benefits for both the patient and the anaesthesiologist. The system has gained global acceptance as a routine method of optimising patients' medical conditions prior to surgery and therefore minimising surgery cancellations and improving hospital efficiency. However, a systematic review found no evidence of the efficiency of (PAC) and therefore we wanted to investigate this with the use of hospitals journals.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The aim of this study is to evaluate the incidence, causes, and consequences of cancellations, and unanticipated intraoperative events after open or laparoscopic surgery of hemicolectomy patients before and after the implementation of a preoperative anaesthesia assessment clinic (PAC).

The primary outcome is to evaluate the incidence of cancellations and unanticipated intraoperative events after open or laparoscopic surgery of hemicolectomy patients before and after implementation of the preoperative anaesthesia assessment clinic (PAC).

The secondary outcome is to evaluate the patients' characteristics, the main events leading to cancellations and the consequences this brings to the patient and the hospital.

Adverse events reported pre-and post-intervention will be analysed. Patient characteristics will be collected: age, gender, diagnosis, reason and type of surgery, patient admission, assessed in PAC or not, ASA classification (American Society of Anesthesiologist Classification system), who performed the assessment (anaesthetic nurse or anaesthesiologist), type of anaesthesia, former diagnosis/disease with impact on anaesthesia/surgery, present smoker, allergies, blood samples, other examinations, cancellation of surgery, reasons and consequences for cancellations, time of anaesthetic assessment before surgery, intraoperative events, mallampati, Intubation grade, BMI and type of medication.

A specific data collection form will be developed and the data will be collected retrospectively from patient journals.

The number is calculated to: n = 588, n = 294 before and after the implementation of PAC. We use a significance level of 5%. To achieve statistical strength of 80% (beta = 20%), we need 288 patients before and after PAC to detect a difference of at least 10%. Given that we have the opportunity to include many more then we assume that our study has adequate strength. Prevalences of cancellations are estimated as shares and presented with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) calculated using the exact method. Possible differences in background variables in patients included before and after the implementation of PAC will be estimated using kji-square tests or t-tests. The effect of the implementation of PAC will be estimated using logistic regression adjusted for possible confounding factors and results will be presented as adjusted odds ratio (OR) with 95% CI.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

2600

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients who have been to surgery for open or laparoscopic partial excision of the intestine.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients over 18 years old.
  • Open or laparoscopic surgery on elective patients after partial excision of the intestine.
  • Patients following the ERAS (Enhanced recovery after surgery) protocol after the year 2014.
  • Patients who attended PAC after the year 2017 and were assessed by anesthesia staff.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Emergency patients

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Pre- Preanaesthesia assessment clinic
Patients who have been to surgery for an elective laparoscopic or open partial intestine from 2014-2017.
Post- Preanaesthesia assessment clinic
Patients who have been to surgery for an elective laparoscopic or open partial intestine from 2017 and have attended a preanesthesia clinic.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cancellation rate, Intraoperative events
Time Frame: 2014-2022
Incidence of Cancellation rate and unanticipated intraoperative events
2014-2022

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient's characteristics , cancellation main events and concequenses.
Time Frame: 2014-2022
Patients'characteristics, main events leading to cancellations of surgery, consequenses the cancellations brings to patients and the hospital.
2014-2022

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ANTICIPATED)

December 1, 2022

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

February 3, 2023

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

April 3, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 25, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 25, 2022

First Posted (ACTUAL)

August 29, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

November 2, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 1, 2022

Last Verified

November 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Colon Disease

3
Subscribe