- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05522101
Mini-sized MCE for Detection of Small Bowel in Children Under the Age of 10 Years
Mini-sized Magnetically Controlled Capsule Endoscopy vs. Normal-sized CE for Detection of Small Bowel in Children Under the Age of 10 Years:A Prospective,Multi-center,Randomized Controlled Trial
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Jinan, China
- Qilu Children's Hospital
-
Contact:
- Junjie Xu
-
Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Changhai Hospital
-
Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Children's Hospital
-
Contact:
- Haifeng Liu
-
Xi'an, China
- Xi'an Children's Hospital
-
Contact:
- Ying Fang
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients and their legal guardians agreed to participate in the study and signed informed consent;
- 2 years ≤ age < 10 years;
- Pediatric patients with suspected small bowel disease who are scheduled for small bowel capsule endoscopy
Exclusion Criteria:
- Intestinal obstruction, stenosis, or fistula is known or suspected;
- Dysphagia or gastric emptying dysfunction;
- Severe asthma, dysphagia or gastroparesis and other emptying disorders;
- Known or suspected possibility of major bleeding from active digestive tract;
- The presence of a pacemaker in the body, except where the pacemaker is a new MRI-compatible product;
- Implanted cochlear implants, magnetic metal drug infusion pumps, nerve stimulators and other electronic devices, as well as magnetic metal foreign bodies;
- Those who plan to undergo magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examination before capsule endoscopy discharge;
- Previous history of abdominal surgery affecting the normal structure of the digestive tract;
- Patients with mental illness;
- Allergic to macromolecular materials such as dimethyl silicone oil;
- Refuse to use electronic gastroscopy to deliver the capsule to the duodenum if the capsule cannot be swallowed by itself;
- Contraindications of intravenous anesthesia;
- Patients who have participated in or are participating in other clinical trials within three months;
- Any other factors considered by the investigator to be inappropriate for enrollment or to affect the participant's participation in the study.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: OTHER
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: PARALLEL
- Masking: NONE
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
EXPERIMENTAL: Mini-sized MCE
AKES-31SW Capsule Endoscopy
|
AKES-31SW capsule endoscopy(Mini-sized MCE), its diameter is 9.5mm, length is 24.5mm, weight is 3.0g, shooting frequency is 0.5-6fps, image resolution is 480*480, working time is not less than 8 hours.
Mini-sized MCE is 0.6 times of traditional MCE in volume and weight, which is the smallest capsule in clinical application
|
PLACEBO_COMPARATOR: Normal sized CE
PillCam Capsule Endoscopy
|
Pillcam SB 3 capsule endoscopy(Normal-sized MCE), its diameter is 11.4mm, length is 26.2mm, weight is 3.0g, shooting frequency is 2-6fps, image resolution is 340*340, working time is not less than 8 hours.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Success rate of self-swallowing with Mini-sized MCE
Time Frame: 2 weeks
|
Self-swallowing was defined as the subjects swallowing capsules for examination by themselves, and no endoscope or other instruments were needed to place capsules during the entire examination process
|
2 weeks
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Completion rate of capsule endoscopy gastric examination in two groups
Time Frame: 2 weeks
|
The stomach was divided into six parts: cardia, fundus, body, antrum, angle and pylorus.
The proportion of all subjects who completed complete observation of the six anatomical parts.
|
2 weeks
|
Completion rate of small bowel examination by capsule endoscopy in two groups
Time Frame: 2 weeks
|
Small bowel examination completion definition: All subjects reached the cecum with capsule endoscopy and completed small bowel examination.
|
2 weeks
|
Success rate of instrument-assisted examination in the two groups
Time Frame: 2 weeks
|
The success rate of device-assisted examination was defined as the proportion of small bowel examinations performed by endoscopists using endoscope-assisted capsules.
|
2 weeks
|
Two groups of capsule endoscopy swallowing time
Time Frame: 2 weeks
|
Swallowing time was defined as the time between the time when the patient first placed the capsule in the mouth and the time when the patient took the first image of the esophagus.
|
2 weeks
|
Two groups of capsule endoscopy swallowing intake of water
Time Frame: 2 weeks
|
Definition of water intake in swallowing capsule: The total amount of water ingested by the subject after swallowing the capsule successfully or unsuccessfully using a measuring cup.
|
2 weeks
|
The degree of difficulty of capsule swallowing in the two groups
Time Frame: 2 weeks
|
Swallowing difficulty is assessed on a scale of 0-5, with 0 being no difficulty and 5 being the most difficult.
|
2 weeks
|
Factors affecting swallowing by capsule endoscopy
Time Frame: 2 weeks
|
Physiological parameter such as BMI were recorded
|
2 weeks
|
Factors affecting gastrointestinal retention under capsule endoscopy
Time Frame: 2 weeks
|
The incidence of capsule retention due to anesthesia or intestinal obstruction was recorded
|
2 weeks
|
The transmit time of esophagus, the transmit time of stomach, the transmit time of small intestine and the retention time of capsule in two groups
Time Frame: 2 weeks
|
The time of the first esophageal image, the first stomach image, the first small intestine image, the first large intestine image and the last image taken by capsule endoscopy were recorded. Esophageal transmit time: time of first stomach image minus time of first esophageal image Stomach transmit time: time of first small intestine image minus time of first stomach image Small bowel transmit time: the time of the first large intestine image minus the time of the first small intestine image Total retention time of the capsule in vivo: total recording time of the capsule in vivo, which is the time of the last image of the capsule minus the time of the first image of the esophagus. |
2 weeks
|
The time of gastric examination was magnetically controlled in the MCE group
Time Frame: 2 weeks
|
2 weeks
|
|
The rate of pylorus was magnetically controlled in the MCE group
Time Frame: 2 weeks
|
2 weeks
|
|
The detection rate of gastrointestinal lesions by capsule endoscopy in two groups
Time Frame: 2 weeks
|
2 weeks
|
|
Mucosal cleanliness of esophagus in two capsule endoscopy groups
Time Frame: 2 weeks
|
Esophageal mucosa cleanliness score (Grade0: no bubbles, saliva or a small amount of bubbles, saliva, no impact on the observation of mucosa; Grade 1: moderate amount of bubbles and saliva, slight effect on observed mucosa; Grade 2: a large number of bubbles and saliva, which have a great influence on the observation of mucosa)
|
2 weeks
|
Mucosal cleanliness of stomach in two capsule endoscopy groups
Time Frame: 2 weeks
|
Gastric mucosa cleanliness score:(Grade 1 : no adhesive mucus and foam, clear field of vision; Grade 2 : there is a small amount of mucus and foam, but the visual field is not blurred, which does not affect the integrity of the examination; Grade 3 : medium amount of mucus and foam, blurred visual field, affecting the integrity of the examination; Grade 4 : large amount of mucus and foam, blurred vision, affecting the integrity of the examination)
|
2 weeks
|
Mucosal cleanliness of small intestine in two capsule endoscopy groups
Time Frame: 2 weeks
|
Small intestinal mucosa cleanliness score: Small bowel cleanliness score (Grade0: no fecal residue or a small amount of clear fluid, clear field of vision; Grade 1: There is a small amount of fecal residue or more clear liquid, and the visual field is still clear, which does not affect the observation; Grade 2: More fecal residue or turbid fecal fluid, blurred vision, affecting observation) |
2 weeks
|
The integrity of esophageal mucosa was observed by capsule endoscopy in the two groups
Time Frame: 2 weeks
|
Esophageal mucosal integrity The dentate line observation was evaluated mainly, including whether the dentate line could be observed, and the number of dentate line observation quadrants;
|
2 weeks
|
The integrity of gastric mucosa was observed by capsule endoscopy in the two groups
Time Frame: 2 weeks
|
Gastric mucosa integrity assessment: The main anatomic sites such as cardia, fundus, body, Angle, antrum and pylorus were observed (grade 1: sufficient observation, ≥ 90% of gastric mucosa could be observed; Grade 2: Good observation, 70-90% of the gastric mucosa can be observed; Level 3: Insufficient observation, < 70% of gastric mucosa can be observed) |
2 weeks
|
The integrity of small bowel mucosa was observed by capsule endoscopy in the two groups
Time Frame: 2 weeks
|
The percentage of the total small bowel examination time in which the mucosa was clearly visible (> 50% visual field) was recorded
|
2 weeks
|
Incidence of adverse events
Time Frame: 2 weeks
|
The rates of adverse events such as asphyxia by capsule aspiration, drug allergy and capsule retention were recorded
|
2 weeks
|
Overall inspection comfort score
Time Frame: 2 weeks
|
A questionnaire survey was conducted on the overall comfort of Normal-sized CE and Mini-sized MCE, with 4 scores as very comfortable, 3 scores as comfortable, 2 scores as tolerable, 1 score as uncomfortable, and 0 score as very uncomfortable.
|
2 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Swaminath A, Legnani P, Kornbluth A. Video capsule endoscopy in inflammatory bowel disease: past, present, and future redux. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2010 Jul;16(7):1254-62. doi: 10.1002/ibd.21220.
- Arguelles-Arias F, Donat E, Fernandez-Urien I, Alberca F, Arguelles-Martin F, Martinez MJ, Molina M, Varea V, Herrerias-Gutierrez JM, Ribes-Koninckx C. Guideline for wireless capsule endoscopy in children and adolescents: A consensus document by the SEGHNP (Spanish Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition) and the SEPD (Spanish Society for Digestive Diseases). Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2015 Dec;107(12):714-31. doi: 10.17235/reed.2015.3921/2015.
- Urs AN, Martinelli M, Rao P, Thomson MA. Diagnostic and therapeutic utility of double-balloon enteroscopy in children. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2014 Feb;58(2):204-12. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000000192.
- Gu Z, Wang Y, Lin K, Wang X, Cheng W, Wang L, Zhang T, Liu H. Magnetically Controlled Capsule Endoscopy in Children: A Single-center, Retrospective Cohort Study. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2019 Jul;69(1):13-17. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000002292.
- Cardey J, Le Gall C, Michaud L, Dabadie A, Talbotec C, Bellaiche M, Lamireau T, Mas E, Bridoux-Henno L, Viala J, Restier-Miron L, Lachaux A. Screening of esophageal varices in children using esophageal capsule endoscopy: a multicenter prospective study. Endoscopy. 2019 Jan;51(1):10-17. doi: 10.1055/a-0647-1709. Epub 2018 Sep 5.
- Pai AK, Jonas MM, Fox VL. Esophageal Capsule Endoscopy in Children and Young Adults With Portal Hypertension. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2019 Dec;69(6):641-647. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000002455.
- Oliva S, Di Nardo G, Hassan C, Spada C, Aloi M, Ferrari F, Redler A, Costamagna G, Cucchiara S. Second-generation colon capsule endoscopy vs. colonoscopy in pediatric ulcerative colitis: a pilot study. Endoscopy. 2014 Jun;46(6):485-92. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1365413. Epub 2014 Apr 28.
- Xie M, Qian Y, Cheng S, Wang L, Shen R. Magnetically Guided Capsule Endoscopy in Pediatric Patients with Abdominal Pain. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2019 May 8;2019:7172930. doi: 10.1155/2019/7172930. eCollection 2019.
- Fritscher-Ravens A, Scherbakov P, Bufler P, Torroni F, Ruuska T, Nuutinen H, Thomson M, Tabbers M, Milla P. The feasibility of wireless capsule endoscopy in detecting small intestinal pathology in children under the age of 8 years: a multicentre European study. Gut. 2009 Nov;58(11):1467-72. doi: 10.1136/gut.2009.177774. Epub 2009 Jul 21.
- Radhakrishnan C, Sefidani Forough A, Cichero JAY, Smyth HE, Raidhan A, Nissen LM, Steadman KJ. A Difficult Pill to Swallow: An Investigation of the Factors Associated with Medication Swallowing Difficulties. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2021 Jan 11;15:29-40. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S277238. eCollection 2021.
- Ohmiya N, Oka S, Nakayama Y, Iwama I, Nakamura M, Shimizu H, Sumioka A, Abe N, Kudo T, Osawa S, Honma H, Okuhira T, Mtsufuji S, Imaeda H, Ota K, Matsuoka R, Hotta N, Inoue M, Nakaji K, Takamaru H, Ozeki K, Kobayashi T, Hosoe N, Tajiri H, Tanaka S. Safety and efficacy of the endoscopic delivery of capsule endoscopes in adult and pediatric patients: Multicenter Japanese study (AdvanCE-J study). Dig Endosc. 2022 Mar;34(3):543-552. doi: 10.1111/den.14104. Epub 2021 Sep 10.
- Burgess CJ, McIntyre EC, Withers GD, Ee LC. Comparing swallowing of capsule to endoscopic placement of capsule endoscopy in children. JGH Open. 2017 Sep 18;1(1):11-14. doi: 10.1002/jgh3.12001. eCollection 2017 Sep.
- Dan T, Dandan S, Enqiang L. Aspiration of a magnetically controlled capsule endoscopy. Gastroenterology. 2019 Apr 11:S0016-5085(19)35686-0. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.04.006. Online ahead of print. No abstract available.
- Melson J, Trikudanathan G, Abu Dayyeh BK, Bhutani MS, Chandrasekhara V, Jirapinyo P, Krishnan K, Kumta NA, Pannala R, Parsi MA, Sethi A, Trindade AJ, Watson RR, Maple JT, Lichtenstein DR. Video capsule endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2021 Apr;93(4):784-796. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.12.001. Epub 2021 Feb 26. No abstract available.
- Jiang B, Qian YY, Pan J, Jiang X, Wang YC, Zhu JH, Zou WB, Zhou W, Li ZS, Liao Z. Second-generation magnetically controlled capsule gastroscopy with improved image resolution and frame rate: a randomized controlled clinical trial (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2020 Jun;91(6):1379-1387. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.01.027. Epub 2020 Jan 22.
- Eliakim R. Where do I see minimally invasive endoscopy in 2020: clock is ticking. Ann Transl Med. 2017 May;5(9):202. doi: 10.21037/atm.2017.04.17.
- Meltzer EO, Welch MJ, Ostrom NK. Pill swallowing ability and training in children 6 to 11 years of age. Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2006 Oct;45(8):725-33. doi: 10.1177/0009922806292786.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (ANTICIPATED)
Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)
Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (ACTUAL)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- Mini-sized MCE
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
IPD Sharing Time Frame
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
- SAP
- ICF
- CSR
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Small Bowel Disease
-
Odense University HospitalCompletedSimulation | Endoscopy | Education | Small Bowel Disease | Small Bowel Capsule EndoscopyDenmark
-
Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, IndiaCompletedSmall Bowel Disease | Small Bowel Ulcers | Capsule Endoscopy | Small Bowel Tumor
-
Medtronic - MITGCompletedInflammatory Bowel Disease | Small Bowel DiseaseUnited States
-
Aspero Medical, Inc.National Institutes of Health (NIH)RecruitingSmall Bowel DiseaseUnited States
-
St. Antonius HospitalCompleted
-
Olympus Corporation of the AmericasUniversity of Florida; Rhode Island Hospital; University of Massachusetts, Worcester and other collaboratorsSuspendedSmall Bowel DiseaseUnited States
-
Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, IndiaRecruiting
-
Chinese University of Hong KongRecruitingSmall Bowel DiseaseHong Kong
-
Olympus Europe SE & Co. KGCompletedSmall Bowel DiseaseFinland, Germany, Belgium, Denmark, France, Norway
-
Wuhan Union Hospital, ChinaChanghai Hospital; Qilu Hospital of Shandong UniversityCompleted
Clinical Trials on Mini-sized MCE
-
Changhai HospitalQilu Hospital of Shandong UniversityCompleted
-
University of Nove de JulhoUniversity of BergenRecruiting
-
Oulu University HospitalLoisto Terveys, Oulu; Fysios Kastelli, Oulu; Faskia-Markus, OuluEnrolling by invitationLow Back Pain | Low Back Pain, RecurrentFinland
-
Yeditepe University HospitalCompleted
-
Changhai HospitalWithdrawn
-
Zhuan LiaoUnknown
-
Changhai HospitalCompleted
-
Changhai HospitalCompletedGastrointestinal DiseaseChina
-
Changhai HospitalWuhan Union Hospital, China; Second Military Medical UniversityCompletedGastric Symptoms | Indicated for Upper GI EndoscopyChina