Cervical Internal os Plasty in Management of Placenta Previa and Focal Accreta

October 5, 2022 updated by: Al Shymaa Mohamed Abd El Hadi, Zagazig University

Aim of the work:

Better management & reducing hemorrhage and complication in patients placenta previa and focal accreta .

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Placenta accrete spectrum (PAS) is one of the major causes of massive obstetric hemorrhage and life-threatening complication of pregnancy. Patients with placenta previa may develop severe postpartum hemorrhage especially when coinciding with placenta accreta, it may be associated with potentially life-threatening maternal hemorrhage after removal of the placenta due to its incomplete separation and massive bleeding from the placental attachment site. Normally, the placenta adheres only to the decidua basalis, thus it separates smoothly from the wall of the uterus after delivery. Placenta accreta (PA) exists when the chorionic villi penetrate through the decidua basalis into the myometrium . The steady rise of cesarean section (CS) delivery rates in recent years combined with increasing maternal age, multiparity, placenta previa, prior uterine surgeries or curettage, and Asherman syndrome is associated with increasing incidence of PAS. In a systematic review, the rate of placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) increase from 0.3% in women with one previous cesarean delivery to 6.74% for women with five or more cesarean deliveries . In the setting of a placenta previa and one or more previous cesarean deliveries, the risk of PAS dramatically increases. For women with placenta previa, the risk of placenta accrete is 3%, 11%, 40%, 61%, 67%, for the first, second, third, fourth, and fifth or more cesareans, respectively. Placenta previa and placenta accrete carry significant maternal and fetal morbidity and mortality. The maternal mortality in women with PA may reach as high as 7-10 % . Acute torrential bleeding, massive blood transfusion, hysterectomy, and even the death of the woman can occur during cesarean delivery because of placenta previa increta. As intraoperative bleeding from PASin the lower uterine segment is often vast, massive, dramatically quick and difficult to stop after removal of the placenta resulting in severe maternal morbidity and mortality it is of outmost importance to have a pre-planned approach to this surgical challenge that is effective and swift. The differences between the lower and upper segments of the uterus are the main cause for postpartum hemorrhage associated with placenta accreta spectrum. The lower uterine segment is highly vascular and slower to retract than upper segment. Surgical intervention is indicated when uterotonic medications fail to control blood loss . The optimal management of PAS remains controversial. However, in practice, the conservative methods sometimes are incapable of stopping the bleeding from the placental attachment site. Moreover, the success of some surgical techniques, such as blood vessel ligation, has been associated with the experience and proficiency of the obstetricians, and in many hospitals, the conditions do not exist for performing perioperative temporary balloon occlusion of the internal iliac arteries and uterine arterial embolization. If these procedures prove invalid, hysterectomy is performed to ensure maternal survival. Currentseveral clinical hemostatic techniques have been described in the literature for controlling massive bleeding associated with placenta previa cesarean sections, including uterine packing with gauze , balloon tamponades,superposition sutures,hemostatic multiple square suturing, insertion of parallel vertical compression sutures , and so on when the bleeding is not so severe. If necessary, obstetricians often attempt to employ B-Lynch sutures, and embolization or ligation of the uterine and internal iliac arteries ,but there is a wide variation in the success rate of these maneuvers . There is lack of consensus on the optimal uterine sparing surgical approach to reduce intraoperative bleeding if the placenta is partially separated. Whilst electing for timely hysterectomy may be recommended and lifesaving, this may not be ideal for women wishing to preserve their fertility and uterine sparing alternative interventions are highly needed.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

  • Name: Basem Hamed
  • Phone Number: 01004132040

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 40 years (ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All the participants with placent aprevia and focal accreta will be diagnosed by ultrasound and color Doppler.
  • One or more previous cesarean section.
  • Gestational age of 32 - 38 weeks.
  • Desire to preserve the uterus

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Diffuse placenta accreta.
  • Placenta percreta.
  • Presence of uncontrollable hemorrhage

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: NA
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: study population
Women with previous one or more cesarean sections with placenta previa and focal accrete
A long Allis forceps will be passed through the uterine incision and used to grasp the anterior lip of the cervix, pulling the cervix upwards into the uterine cavity. An assistant sometimes needs to elevate the cervix upwards from the vaginal aspect. The anterior lip of the cervix will be sutured to the anterior wall of the lower uterine segment using two or three simple interrupted absorbable stitches (Vicryl or Vicryl rapid no. 0). This aids to compress the bleeding sites of the placental bed and support the very thin lower uterine segment. If the placenta was implanted posteriorly and the bleeding areas will be mainly from the posterior wall of the uterus, the same procedure could be repeated using the posterior lip of the cervix. A Hegar dilator (size 12) will be inserted in a retrograde manner from the abdominal aspect toensure patency of the cervical canal .

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
amount of intra-operative blood loss (mL)
Time Frame: 5 months
5 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Number of patients develop postpartum hemorrhage (500 mL or greater).
Time Frame: 5 months
5 months
Number of patients need blood transfusion
Time Frame: 5 months
5 months
Number of patients need hysterectomy
Time Frame: 5 months
5 months
Mean duration of postoperative hospital stay (days).
Time Frame: 5 months
5 months
Time needed to perform the technique (minutes).
Time Frame: 5 months
5 months
Number ot participants develop complications: •Urinary bladder injury •Wound infection •Postoperative fever.
Time Frame: 5 months
5 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ANTICIPATED)

October 1, 2022

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

January 1, 2023

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

February 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 24, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 28, 2022

First Posted (ACTUAL)

September 30, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

October 10, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 5, 2022

Last Verified

September 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Cervix IO in placenta previa

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on cervical internal os plasty

3
Subscribe