Performance and Safety of a Digital Tool for Unsupervised Self-assessment of NMOSD (OPTIS)

March 22, 2024 updated by: Ad scientiam

Performance and Safety of a Digital Tool for Unsupervised Self-assessment of Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder

NMOSDCopilot is a digital tool developed for the self-assessment of Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder symptoms that impact patients' functioning and quality of life. It has been co-designed with the help of patient advocacy groups, NMOSD patients and medical experts. It includes a smartphone-based application for patients, connected to a web portal developed for healthcare professionals (HCSPs). The patient application is composed of vision, walking, cognition, and dexterity e-active tests inspired by clinical standards, as well as e-questionnaires. The HCP web portal is a desktop-based software that allows HCPs to access the results generated via the patient application and facilitates remote monitoring of patients' symptoms.

The objectives of this study are to validate the accuracy, reliability and reproducibility of the unsupervised at-home self-assessment of symptoms on the patient's smartphone versus the standard in-clinic testing, as well as to evaluate the safety of use of the tool, its usability, and satisfaction towards the patient application among NMOSD patients, and the HCP web dashboard among HCPs.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

103

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Lille, France, 59037
      • Montpellier, France, 34295
      • Nice, France, 06000
        • Recruiting
        • Hopital Pasteur 2
        • Contact:
      • Paris, France
        • Recruiting
        • Hôpital La Pitié Salpétrière
        • Contact:
      • Rouen, France, 76038
      • Strasbourg, France, 67000
        • Recruiting
        • Hopital de Hautepierre
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Jérôme DE SEZE
    • Florida
      • Tampa, Florida, United States, 33612
        • Recruiting
        • University of South Florida
        • Contact:
    • Illinois
      • Evanston, Illinois, United States, 60201
        • Recruiting
        • NorthShore University HealthSystem
        • Contact:
    • Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21287
        • Recruiting
        • Johns Hopkins Outpatient Center (now called Levi Watkins, Jr., M.D., Outpatient Center)
        • Contact:
          • Elias S Sotirchos
          • Phone Number: 410-614-1522
          • Email: ess@jhmi.edu
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02114
        • Recruiting
        • Massachussets General Hospital
        • Contact:
    • Missouri
      • Washington, Missouri, United States, 63130
        • Recruiting
        • Washington University in St. Louis
        • Contact:
    • Nevada
      • Las Vegas, Nevada, United States, 89106
        • Recruiting
        • CC Lou Ruvo Center for Brain Health
        • Contact:
    • Oklahoma
      • Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States, 73104
        • Recruiting
        • Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 60 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Aged 18 to 60 years old
  • NMOSD as defined by the 2015 international consensus diagnostic criteria (AQP4+ only)
  • With NMOSD treatment (treatment must be unchanged since 6 months before enrollment, and 1 month for analgesics, antidepressants, neuroleptics)
  • EDSS =< 7
  • With no evidence of relapse in the past 3 months before enrollment
  • Who have read the information sheet and signed the informed consent form
  • Able to use a smartphone
  • Owns a personal smartphone which version is above 13 for IOS and 8 for Android included
  • Able to read language in which the mobile application is available and able to understand pictograms

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Evidence of neurologic, rheumatologic or psychiatric disorder other than NMOSD, including but not limited to major head trauma, seizures or systemic medical diseases that are likely to affect cognitive, upper limb or lower limb functioning
  • Pregnant and nursing women
  • Person under guardianship or curatorship
  • Bedridden patients or patients with a daily activity of less than 2 hours per day
  • Current drugs or/and alcohol abuse that could influence performance on the tests (clinician's judgment)
  • Subject has participated in another clinical study within the previous 30 days of screening or is currently participating in another study that, in the opinion of the Investigator, might interfere with the participant's full participation in the study or confound the assessment of the participant or outcome of the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: NMOSDCopilot
Performance of digital tests and standard test in clinic at D0 and M6 Use of NMOSDCopilot at-home in between visits during 12 months
NMOSDCopilot includes active tests for walking, cognition, dexterity and vision, and e-questionnaires related to pain, fatigue, quality of life, bladder and bowel dysfunction, depression

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To compare results obtained with unsupervised at-home e-active tests and the corresponding supervised in-clinic standard tests, test to test
Time Frame: Standard tests results at Baseline versus e-active tests results at D0 + 7 days
Pearson correlation coefficient (or Spearman's rank-order correlation depending on the data distribution) between e-active tests at day 7 versus standard tests at baseline
Standard tests results at Baseline versus e-active tests results at D0 + 7 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To assess reproducibility between in-clinic and at-home e-active tests
Time Frame: Baseline, day 7, month 6 - 7 days, month 6
Pearson correlation coefficient (or Spearman's rank-order correlation depending on the data distribution) between e-active tests at day 7 versus standard tests at baseline and between and month 6 and month 6- 7days
Baseline, day 7, month 6 - 7 days, month 6
To assess test-retest reliability of at-home e-active tests
Time Frame: Month 1, month 2, month 3, month 4, month 5
Intraclass correlation coefficient of e-active tests
Month 1, month 2, month 3, month 4, month 5
To compare results obtained with in-clinic e-active tests and in-clinic standard tests, test to test
Time Frame: Baseline, month 6, month 12
Pearson's correlation coefficient of inc-clinic e-active tests and in-clinic standard tests
Baseline, month 6, month 12
To assess the adverse events related to of the mobile application use.
Time Frame: through study completion, 21 months
descriptive analysis of adverse events (AEs) related to the use of the application.
through study completion, 21 months
To assess pain
Time Frame: Month 3, month 6, month 12
Pain Visual Analogue Scale (0-100) higher score meaning a worse outcome
Month 3, month 6, month 12
To assess fatigue
Time Frame: Month 3, month 6, month 12
Modified Fatigue Impact Scale 5 (0-20) higher score meaning a worse outcome
Month 3, month 6, month 12
To assess bladder control
Time Frame: Month 3, month 6, month 12
Bladder Control Scale (0-22) higher score meaning a worse outcome
Month 3, month 6, month 12
To assess bowel control
Time Frame: Month 3, month 6, month 12
Bowel Control Scale (0-22) higher score meaning a worse outcome
Month 3, month 6, month 12
To assess depression
Time Frame: Month 3, month 6, month 12
Patient Health Questionnaire-8 (0-12) higher score meaning a worse outcome
Month 3, month 6, month 12
To assess quality of life
Time Frame: Baseline, month 6, month 12
p-value of multivariate analysis for non-parametric data
Baseline, month 6, month 12
To assess disability
Time Frame: Baseline, month 6, month 12
Expanded Disability Status Scale (0-10), higher score meaning a worse outcome
Baseline, month 6, month 12
To assess satisfaction and user experience with the smartphone application and the web dashboard
Time Frame: Through study completion, 21 months
Descriptive analysis of satisfaction and user experience questionnaires (System Usability Scale (1-100) higher score meaning a better outcome)
Through study completion, 21 months
To assess at-home compliance and adherence to the patient application
Time Frame: Through study completion, 21 months
Descriptive analysis of the mobile application's adherence data (number of completed questionnaires, number of sessions performed etc.).
Through study completion, 21 months
To compare results obtained with at home MVT and in-clinic OCT-scan
Time Frame: Through study completion, 21 months
The Pearson's correlation coefficient will be used to assess the relation between MVT e-active test at D0 +7 (home) versus standard OCT-scan test at D0 (in clinic). The minimum coefficient to reach is 0.65 to show that low contrast visual acuity measurement is associated with. RNF & GCIP layer thickness
Through study completion, 21 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 3, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

November 3, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 7, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 3, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

October 4, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 22, 2024

Last Verified

March 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Neuromyelitis Optica

Clinical Trials on NMOSDCopilot smartphone application

3
Subscribe