Effect of Gabapentin on Post-Operative Pain in Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy (GPOP)

November 13, 2023 updated by: University of Oklahoma

The Effect of Gabapentin on Post-Operative Pain in Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Study

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) has been synonymous with increasing non-opioid multimodal therapies and decreasing opioid therapies after surgery to improve perioperative care. Gabapentin has been standardized as part of routine adjuvant post-operative enhanced recovery protocols after other surgical specialties surgeries. Limited data is known about the specifics of routine adjuvant post-operative gabapentin in the realm of urogynecology. Sacrocolpopexy has been noted as a highly effective prolapse surgical treatment, especially with apical and multicompartment prolapse. In 2006, approximately 73% of all sacrocolpopexy across the nation are completed through a minimally invasive approach. The role of gabapentin as part of a postoperative pain protocol following minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy (MISC) has yet to be determined.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

This will be a randomized controlled pilot trial to determine the effect of a standard postoperative pain protocol with scheduled gabapentin versus placebo in decreasing post-operative pain scores. An institutional review board approach will be obtained and the trial will be registered at Clinicaltrials.gov and the protocol adhered to CONSORT guidelines.

Recruitment will start in October 2022 until completion of pilot study enrollment numbers at OU Health - a single academic center. If patients meet inclusion criteria (see below), willing participants will sign a written consent on their preoperative visit.

Researchers will be recruiting 20 patients per study arm: standard ERAS protocol post-operative care with placebo vs study group given standard ERAS protocol with scheduled postoperative gabapentin for the first two weeks following surgery.

Randomization will be computer generated, using a 1:1 allocation and variable block sizes of 2 and 4. Randomization and packing with opaque bags will be performed by our institution's investigation drug pharmacy. Consents will be signed by trained research assistant(s) and randomization should be maintained throughout the duration of enrollment. Patients will receive their medications concealed within an opaque bag given by the surgical team.

The primary outcome is pain during normal activity and rest via a standardized telephone prompt using the validated surgical pain scale (SPS) on POD 3-5 and 7-10. The SPS uses a numeric range from 0 to 10 with 0 representing no pain and 10 representing the worst pain imaginable. Pain scale will be assessed and opioid consumption will be measured at POD 14-16 during their routine follow up. Patients will be asked the number remaining opiate medications left at their follow up visit.

The secondary outcomes include adverse events, characterized using the National Institute of Health Common Terminology of Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0. Researchers also plan to collect sociodemographic data: age, parity, race, past medical, and past surgical history. Data from routinely administered validated PFDI-20 and PFIQ-7 forms will also be obtained. Surgical data including concomitant procedures, intra- and perioperative complications, estimated blood loss, length of stay, and whether or not the patient discharges home with a catheter will be noted.

Standard post-operative pain control consists of continuous acetaminophen and/or NSAIDs and as needed oral opiates (oxycodone 5-10mg) for moderate to severe pain. If the patient randomizes to the study group, they will receive 14 days of gabapentin starting on postoperative day (POD) 1. Researchers will utilize a dosing pattern that was previously used in the Wu et al. randomized control trial as it was made in consultation with a geriatric pharmacist. Dosing will include administration of gabapentin 300mg nightly for 3 nights and then be increased to 300mg twice a day for an additional 11 days - a total of 25 tablets. Funding for the study and placebo medications for this study will be provided by an internal grant by the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Patients will be asked to complete a validated Surgical Pain Scale (SPS) pre-operatively to assess baseline pain. All vaginal and abdominal incisions will be infiltrated with local anesthetic prior to incision for both groups. Both groups will be given a standard senna (8.6mg) with docusate (50mg) daily post-operative bowel regimen as previously published by Patel et al. a.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

40

Phase

  • Early Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Oklahoma
      • Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States, 73104
        • Recruiting
        • University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Lieschen Quiroz, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 99 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• Patients have a diagnosis of uterovaginal prolapse, vaginal vault prolapse, or pelvic organ prolapse (based on International Classification of Diseases [ICD]).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Concurrent sphincter or fistula repair, urethral diverticulectomy or mesh excision
  • Current gabapentin or pregabalin use
  • Oxygen dependency
  • Renal failure or glomerular filtration rate of < 30mL/min
  • Daily narcotic usage >2 months - this is to allow us to capture an opiate-naïve patient population to better assess the impact of adjuvant gabapentin

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Placebo Arm
Standard ERAS protocol post-operative care with placebo
Placebo given for two weeks after surgery
Active Comparator: Gabapentin Arm
Standard ERAS protocol with scheduled postoperative gabapentin
Scheduled gabapentin given for two weeks after surgery

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Examine the efficacy of gabapentin in changing postoperative pain scores
Time Frame: 2 weeks post-op
Measured using the validated surgical pain scale in which 0 (minimum value) means no pain sensation and 10 (maximum value) means most intense pain imaginable
2 weeks post-op

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Post-operative opioid consumption
Time Frame: 2 weeks post-op
Patients will be asked the number remaining opiate medications left at their follow up visit.
2 weeks post-op
Patient satisfaction
Time Frame: 2 weeks post-op
Patient satisfaction will be obtained using the Pelvic Floor Disability Index questionnaire in which the symptom scale ranges from 0 = not present to 4 = quite a bit in relation to symptoms and how much they bother the participant.
2 weeks post-op
Degree of somnolence
Time Frame: 2 weeks post-op
The Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire measures how symptoms affect activities, relationships and feelings, ranging from Not at all to Quite a bit.
2 weeks post-op

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Lieschen Quiroz, MD, University of Oklahoma

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 29, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

October 31, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 31, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 3, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 7, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

November 8, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

November 16, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 13, 2023

Last Verified

November 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Post Operative Pain

Clinical Trials on Placebo

3
Subscribe