Advance Care Planning Training for Nurses

March 8, 2024 updated by: Carmen Chan Yip Wing-han, Chinese University of Hong Kong

The Effectiveness of a Multi-media Experiential Training Programme in Advance Care Planning for Nurses Working in Acute Care Settings

The aims of this study are to examine the effectiveness of a multi-media experiential training programme in advance care planning (ACP) for nursing staff in acute care settings. The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • can the programme enhance nurses' decision-support skills
  • can the programme strengthen nurses' knowledge and confidence, and improve their attitude toward ACP?

Researchers will compare the participants in the intervention group (receive training programme) with those who are in the control group (receive no intervention) to evaluate the effectiveness of the programme.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Detailed Description

The study adopts a cluster randomised controlled trial with 12 weeks (T2) and 24 weeks (T3) follow-ups. A total of 234 eligible nurses working in 26 acute care hospital wards will be randomised at ward level in a 1:1 ratio into either control or intervention arms. Guided by the Theory of Planned Behaviour, we will conduct path analysis to assess the role of nurses' knowledge, attitudes and confidence on the nurses' skill performance on decision support after the intervention.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

234

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Kwun Tong, Hong Kong
        • Recruiting
        • United Christian Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Ying Tung Chan
          • Phone Number: 2379 9611
      • Mong Kok, Hong Kong
        • Recruiting
        • Queen Elizabeth Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Lok Yan Ng
          • Phone Number: 35052601
      • Sha Tin, Hong Kong
        • Recruiting
        • Prince of Wales Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Ka Fai Mr Wong
          • Phone Number: 35052601
      • Shatin, Hong Kong
        • Recruiting
        • Shatin Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Fion HUI
          • Phone Number: 39197623
      • Shatin, Hong Kong
        • Recruiting
        • Shatin cheshire home
        • Contact:
          • Kwok
          • Phone Number: 2636 7288
      • Tseung Kwan O, Hong Kong
        • Recruiting
        • Haven of Hope Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Patty Lui
          • Phone Number: 2703 8000
      • Tuen Mun, Hong Kong
        • Recruiting
        • Tuen Mun Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Red Chan
          • Phone Number: 2468 5111
      • Wong Chuk Hang, Hong Kong
        • Recruiting
        • Grantham Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Wendy
          • Phone Number: 2518 2111

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • registered nurse with at least two years' clinical experience

Exclusion Criteria:

  • had prior specialty training in Advance Care Planning communication.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intervention group
will receive a multi-media experiential training programme.
  1. Webpage and mobile applications of training material on ACP, to be offered four weeks before the workshop
  2. A three-hour multimedia workshop (8-10 nurses per group) including enhanced lectures and a role play encounter with standardised patients. Immediate feedback on their quality of decision support skills will be given. The workshops will be delivered by an experienced advance practice nurse with a palliative care specialty.
  3. Writing a reflective journal after the role play with standardised patients
No Intervention: control group
will NOT receive a multi-media experiential training programme

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Nurse's decision support skills as assessed by the Brief Decision Support Analysis Tool (DSAT10)
Time Frame: Baseline
DSAT10 instrument is an observational feedback tool for evaluating decisional support interactions between health care workers and patients. The DSAT-10 includes 16 items divided into five domains of: Decision-Making Status; Knowledge of Options, Risks, and Benefits; Values Associated with Outcomes of Options. Scores range from zero to ten, with higher scores indicating more decisional support being verbalized during the patient-provider interaction.
Baseline
Nurse's decision support skills as assessed by the Brief Decision Support Analysis Tool (DSAT10)
Time Frame: immediate post-intervention
DSAT10 instrument is an observational feedback tool for evaluating decisional support interactions between health care workers and patients. The DSAT-10 includes 16 items divided into five domains of: Decision-Making Status; Knowledge of Options, Risks, and Benefits; Values Associated with Outcomes of Options. Scores range from zero to ten, with higher scores indicating more decisional support being verbalized during the patient-provider interaction.
immediate post-intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Nurses' attitudes towards Advance Care Planning
Time Frame: Baseline
Nurses' attitudes towards ACP will be measured by nine five-point Likert scale items with 1=strongly disagree and 5= strongly agree. Higher scores indicate a more positive attitude. The scale was developed and validated by Putman-Casdorph et al . The nine items cover topics such as the perceived helpfulness of ACP, and worries about the legal consequences of limiting treatment.
Baseline
Nurses' knowledge of Advance Care Planning
Time Frame: Baseline
Knowledge of advance care planning and advance directives will be assessed by a 10-item true / false questionnaire which is developed taking reference with Siu et al. and Yee et al. The knowledge test will be validated by an expert panel including academics and clinicians.
Baseline
Nurses' level of confidence to conduct Advance Care Planning
Time Frame: Baseline
Nurses' level of confidence to conduct ACP will be measured by a single item five-point Likert scale with 1= not confident at all to 5 = extremely confident .
Baseline
Nurses' level of confidence to conduct Advance Care Planning
Time Frame: 12 weeks post-intervention
Nurses' level of confidence to conduct ACP will be measured by a single item five-point Likert scale with 1= not confident at all to 5 = extremely confident .
12 weeks post-intervention
Actual experience of Advance Care Planning in the last 12 weeks
Time Frame: Baseline
Actual experience in ACP discussion will be measured by this question: "How many times have you participated in ACP discussion with your patients in the last 12 weeks?" In addition, documentation of the ACP discussion in the last 12 weeks will be retrieved from patients' medical records.
Baseline
Actual experience of Advance Care Planning in the last 12 weeks
Time Frame: 12 weeks post-intervention
Actual experience in ACP discussion will be measured by this question: "How many times have you participated in ACP discussion with your patients in the last 12 weeks?" In addition, documentation of the ACP discussion in the last 12 weeks will be retrieved from patients' medical records.
12 weeks post-intervention
Nurses' attitudes towards Advance Care Planning
Time Frame: immediate post-intervention
Nurses' attitudes towards ACP will be measured by nine five-point Likert scale items with 1=strongly disagree and 5= strongly agree. Higher scores indicate a more positive attitude. The scale was developed and validated by Putman-Casdorph et al . The nine items cover topics such as the perceived helpfulness of ACP, and worries about the legal consequences of limiting treatment.
immediate post-intervention
Nurses' attitudes towards Advance Care Planning
Time Frame: 12 weeks post-intervention
Nurses' attitudes towards ACP will be measured by nine five-point Likert scale items with 1=strongly disagree and 5= strongly agree. Higher scores indicate a more positive attitude. The scale was developed and validated by Putman-Casdorph et al . The nine items cover topics such as the perceived helpfulness of ACP, and worries about the legal consequences of limiting treatment.
12 weeks post-intervention
Nurses' knowledge of Advance Care Planning
Time Frame: immediate post-intervention
Knowledge of advance care planning and advance directives will be assessed by a 10-item true / false questionnaire which is developed taking reference with Siu et al. and Yee et al. The knowledge test will be validated by an expert panel including academics and clinicians.
immediate post-intervention
Nurses' knowledge of Advance Care Planning
Time Frame: 12 weeks post-intervention
Knowledge of advance care planning and advance directives will be assessed by a 10-item true / false questionnaire which is developed taking reference with Siu et al. and Yee et al. The knowledge test will be validated by an expert panel including academics and clinicians.
12 weeks post-intervention
Nurses' knowledge of Advance Care Planning
Time Frame: 24 weeks post-intervention
Knowledge of advance care planning and advance directives will be assessed by a 10-item true / false questionnaire which is developed taking reference with Siu et al. and Yee et al. The knowledge test will be validated by an expert panel including academics and clinicians.
24 weeks post-intervention
Nurses' level of confidence to conduct Advance Care Planning
Time Frame: immediate post-intervention
Nurses' level of confidence to conduct ACP will be measured by a single item five-point Likert scale with 1= not confident at all to 5 = extremely confident .
immediate post-intervention
Nurses' level of confidence to conduct Advance Care Planning
Time Frame: 24 weeks post-intervention
Nurses' level of confidence to conduct ACP will be measured by a single item five-point Likert scale with 1= not confident at all to 5 = extremely confident .
24 weeks post-intervention
Nurses' satisfaction with the training programme
Time Frame: immediate post intervention
Nurses' satisfaction with the training programme will be assessed by an eight-item five-point Likert scale with 1=strongly disagree and 5= strongly agree at post-test only. Higher scores indicate higher satisfaction. The scale is developed with reference to So et al. and has been validated by an expert panel including academics and clinicians.
immediate post intervention
Actual experience of Advance Care Planning in the last 12 weeks
Time Frame: 24 weeks post-intervention
Actual experience in ACP discussion will be measured by this question: "How many times have you participated in ACP discussion with your patients in the last 12 weeks?" In addition, documentation of the ACP discussion in the last 12 weeks will be retrieved from patients' medical records.
24 weeks post-intervention
Adherence to patients' expressed preference for care
Time Frame: 12 weeks post-intervention
measured by this question: Please circle the following to describe health care professionals' adherence to patients' expressed preference for care :
12 weeks post-intervention
Adherence to patients' expressed preference for care
Time Frame: 24 weeks post-intervention
measured by this question: Please circle the following to describe health care professionals' adherence to patients' expressed preference for care :
24 weeks post-intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Carmen Chan Yip Wing-han, Chinese University of Hong Kong

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 15, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 6, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 20, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

November 23, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 12, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 8, 2024

Last Verified

March 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Advance Care Planning

Clinical Trials on Multi-media experiential training programme

3
Subscribe