Impact of the Save the Shame! Game on Advanced Life Support Knowledge

March 29, 2023 updated by: Sara Santos Ribeiro, Centro Hospitalar de Vila Nova de Gaia/Espinho, E.P.E.

Impact of the Save the Shame! Game on Advanced Life Support Knowledge of Nurses and Physicians in Intensive Care Medicine Settings, a Pilot Randomized Study

Gamification, listed by the European Resuscitation Council (ERC) as a learning process in its 2021 guidelines, is a new digital innovation tool that brings added value towards motivation that seems to reuse time in a creative way. The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of the game "Save the shame!" on advanced life support (ALS) knowledge of nurses and physicians in intensive care medicine settings. This is a cross-sectional study following a mixed methodology. In its preliminary phase it follows a qualitative and exploratory methodology, with application of the E-Delphi technique for creation and validation of the "Save the shame! game and validation of the ALS knowledge test. The study subsequently follows the experimental methodology. The investigators expect to confirm the hypothesis that the game "Save the Shame!" has a positive impact on the skills training of health professionals in intensive care medicine settings in a Portuguese hospital center.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Study Design The investigators developed an experimental approach, where randomization in sample identification was ensured and where a control group was present, favoring a strongest level of contribution to the evidence. This is a cross-sectional study with quantitative data collection following a Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) design.

In order to carry out the proposed experimental study, it was necessary to create two essential elements in this process: the "Save the Same!" game and the ALS knowledge assessment test, which constitutes a data collection instrument necessary to test the research hypotheses.

Arms, Groups, and Interventions The population was defined as nurses and physicians of the intensive care units of a Portuguese hospital center (N=275). The inclusion criteria were, to be a nurse or a physician, to provide care in a intensive care unit of the identified hospital center (cirurgical, cardiothoracic, coronary, medical or trauma). On the other hand, the exclusion criteria were, be any other health professional, providing care in settings other than intensive care settings, absence of informed consent, belonging to the invited group of experts, participation in the instrument design pre-test.

Participants were invited via institutional email and data was collected through the access of on-line platforms.

The experimental group was asked to use the game. Two weeks were defined as the time to use the game. The use of the game can be seen by the coded digital record on its digital platform. The control group neither used nor had access to the game. Afterwards both groups performed the ALS knowledge assessment test. It is a test with 20 multiple choice questions each scored as right (0.5 points) or wrong (0 points).

The sample was stratified in order to eliminate "professional group" variable. This was a protocol update at made at 10th of March

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

24

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Vila Nova De Gaia, Portugal
        • CHVNG

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • to be a nurse or a physician,
  • to provide care in a intensive care unit of the identified hospital center (cirurgical, cardiothoracic, coronary, medical or trauma)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • be any other health professional
  • providing care in settings other than intensive care settings
  • absence of informed consent
  • belonging to the invited group of experts
  • participation in the instrument design pre-test

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Experimental
The experimental group will be inveted to use the game. Two weeks were defined as the time to use the game. The use of the game can be seen by the coded digital record on its digital platform .
The experimental group was asked to use the game. Two weeks were defined as the time to use the game. The use of the game can be seen by the coded digital record on its digital platform . The control group neither used nor had access to the game. Afterwards both groups performed the ALS knowledge assessment test. It is a test with 20 multiple choice questions each scored as right (0.5 points) or wrong (0 points).
No Intervention: Control
The control group neither used nor had access to the game.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The score at the advanced life support knowledge assessment test
Time Frame: 3 weeks

The minimun score at the scale is 0 and the maximum is 100, were 100 means the best result.

It was applied through an online application, facilitating the participation of the guests and providing the automatic transcription of the results. The platform registration was carried out in a coded manner, thus ensuring the anonymity of the participants.

3 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 10, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 10, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 18, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

January 20, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 31, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 29, 2023

Last Verified

March 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 01 (Miami VAHS)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Intensive Care

Clinical Trials on Invitation to play the game "Save the shame!"

3
Subscribe