Impact of Y90 Radiation Segmentectomy on HCC

January 18, 2023 updated by: Aaron M Fischman, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

The Impact of 90Yttrium (Y90) Radiation Segmentectomy on Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Cirrhosis

The aim of this pilot study is to assess the efficacy of radiation segmentectomy with Theraspheres in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma that would qualify for thermal ablation as per the BCLC guidelines, but are unable to receive thermal ablation due to unfavorable location of target lesions.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

29

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10029
        • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age greater than 18 years, regardless of race or gender
  • Hepatocellular Carcinoma confirmed by histology for non-cirrhotic patients or non-invasive criteria according to AASLD for cirrhotic patients
  • Child-Pugh class A or B7 without ascites
  • Single tumor nodule ≤ 3 cm with a maximum distance of 5 mm from portal vein, hepatic vein, inferior vena cava, diaphragm, heart, stomach, bowel, liver capsule, gallbladder, bile duct
  • No prior locoregional treatment or external beam therapy of current HCC (recurrent HCC after resection may be included)
  • No confirmed extrahepatic metastases
  • No evidence of macrovascular invasion
  • ECOG 0
  • Albumin > 3.0 g/dL
  • PLT ≥ 40 x103/μL
  • WBC ≥ 1.5 x103/μL
  • AST/ALT ≤ 5 times the upper limit of normal (U/L)
  • Creatinine ≤ 2.0 mg /dL
  • No indication for any possible curative treatment after multidisciplinary assessment (surgery, ablation)
  • No contraindication to angiography or selective visceral catheterization
  • No history of severe allergy or intolerance to contrast agents, narcotics, sedatives.
  • Negative serum pregnancy test
  • Signed informed consent form

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Not meeting the inclusion criteria

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: NA
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
OTHER: Radiation Segmentectomy
Radiation Segmentectomy on Resectable HCC
The administration of radioactivity in a branch of an artery of the liver

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Local Tumor Response According to mRECIST
Time Frame: 2 years

Efficacy of 90Yttrium (Y90) Radiation Segmentectomy on Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma as measured by tumor response according to mRECIST.

CR = Disappearance of any intratumoral arterial enhancement in all target lesions PR = At least a 30% decrease in the diameter of the viable (enhancement in the arterial phase) target lesion SD = Any cases that do not qualify for either partial response or progressive disease PD = An increase of at least 20% in the diameter of viable (enhancing) target lesion

2 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Median Time to Progression (TTP)
Time Frame: 2 years
Time until progression of the target lesion and overall disease based on mRECIST
2 years
Cumulative Incidence of Participants With Local Progression
Time Frame: 1 year and 2 years

Cumulative incidence function estimation of the incidence of the occurrence of local progression (event) at 1 year and 2 years while taking the competing risk of transplant into account.

Local progression was defined per modified Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (mRECIST) for target lesions and assessed by MRI with local progression defined as an >20% increase in the diameter of the viable (enhancing) target lesion, taking as a reference of the baseline enhancing tumor size.

1 year and 2 years
Quantifying Dose to Target Lesion
Time Frame: 0 days
The dose was calculated using PET/CT calculated dose estimation delivered to the tumor. Counts on PET/CT post-treatment were used to estimate the dose delivered to the tumor.
0 days
Number of Treatment-related Adverse Events
Time Frame: For 2 years with visits 6 weeks post treatment then every 3 months since treatment for 24 months for assessment of laboratory and clinical symptoms
Number of treatment related adverse events according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v 5.0 (CTCAE).
For 2 years with visits 6 weeks post treatment then every 3 months since treatment for 24 months for assessment of laboratory and clinical symptoms
Number of Participants With Access Site-related Adverse Events
Time Frame: For 2 years with visits 6 weeks post treatment then every 3 months since treatment for 24 months for assessment of laboratory and clinical symptoms
Number of participants with access site-related adverse events
For 2 years with visits 6 weeks post treatment then every 3 months since treatment for 24 months for assessment of laboratory and clinical symptoms
Number of Participants With Treatment-related Laboratory Adverse Events
Time Frame: For 2 years with visits 6 weeks post treatment then every 3 months since treatment for 24 months for assessment of laboratory changes
Number of participants with treatment-related laboratory adverse events assessed 6 weeks post-treatment then every 3 months since treatment for 24 months
For 2 years with visits 6 weeks post treatment then every 3 months since treatment for 24 months for assessment of laboratory changes

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Aaron Fischman, MD, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

August 3, 2016

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

March 31, 2021

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

March 31, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 10, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 10, 2017

First Posted (ACTUAL)

August 14, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

February 13, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 18, 2023

Last Verified

January 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Clinical Trials on Radiation Segmentectomy

3
Subscribe