PO vs IV Antibiotics for the Treatment of Infected Nonunion of Fractures After Fixation (POvIV2)

PO Versus IV Antibiotics for the Treatment of Infected Nonunion of Fractures After Fixation

This is a Phase III clinical randomized control trial to investigate differences between patient with an infected nonunion treated by PO vs. IV antibiotics. The study population will be 250 patients, 18 years or older, being treated for infected nonunion after internal fixation of a fracture with a segmental defect less than one centimeter. Patients will be randomly assigned to either the treatment (group 1) PO antibiotics for 6 weeks or the control group (group 2) IV antibiotics for 6 weeks. The primary hypothesis is that the effectiveness of oral antibiotic therapy is equivalent to traditional intravenous antibiotic therapy for the treatment of infected nonunion after fracture internal fixation, when such therapy is combined with appropriate surgical management. Clinical effectiveness will be measured as the primary outcome as the number of secondary re-admissions related to injury and secondary outcomes of treatment failure (re-infection, nonunion, antibiotic complications) within the first one year of follow-up, as defined by specified criteria and determined by a blinded data assessment panel. In addition, treatment compliance, the cost of treatment, the number of surgeries required, the type and incidence of complications, and the duration of hospitalization will be measured.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This is a Phase III clinical randomized control trial to investigate differences between patient with an infected nonunion treated by PO vs. IV antibiotics. The study population will be 250 patients, 18 years or older, being treated for infected nonunion after internal fixation of a fracture with a segmental defect less than one centimeter. Patients will be randomly assigned to either the treatment (group 1) PO antibiotics for 6 weeks or the control group (group 2) IV antibiotics for 6 weeks. The primary hypothesis is that the effectiveness of oral antibiotic therapy is equivalent to traditional intravenous antibiotic therapy for the treatment of infected nonunion after fracture internal fixation, when such therapy is combined with appropriate surgical management. Clinical effectiveness will be measured as the primary outcome as the number of secondary re-admissions related to injury and secondary outcomes of treatment failure (re-infection, nonunion, antibiotic complications) within the first one year of follow-up, as defined by specified criteria and determined by a blinded data assessment panel. In addition, treatment compliance, the cost of treatment, the number of surgeries required, the type and incidence of complications, and the duration of hospitalization will be measured.

The specific Aims of this study are to:

Specific Aim 1. Evaluate the effect of treatment of infected nonunion in bone fractures treated with revision fixation and either: (Group 1) operative debridement and PO antibiotic suppression for 6 weeks; or (Group 2) operative debridement and 6 weeks IV antibiotics.

Primary Hypothesis 1a: The rate of re-hospitalization for injury-related complication by one year in Group 1 will be non-inferior to the rate in Group 2.

Hypothesis 1b:. The rate of treatment failure by one year in Group 1 will be non-inferior to the rate in Group 2.

Hypothesis 1c: The rate of persistent infection by one year in Group 1 will be non-inferior to the rate in Group 2.

Hypothesis 1d: The rate of persistent nonunion by one year in Group 1 will be non-inferior to the rate in Group 2.

Hypothesis 1e: The rate of amputation by one year in Group 1 will be non-inferior to the rate in Group 2. Hypothesis 1f: Per patient total costs at 1 year will be lower in Group 1 than in Group 2.

Hypothesis 1g: Compliance in Group 1 will be non-inferior to compliance in Group 2.

Specific Aim 2. Build and validate a risk prediction model for failure of treatment of infected nonunion after fixation of fractures.

Hypothesis 2a: Demographic and injury characteristics will be highly predictive of treatment failure.

Hypothesis 2b: Open fractures will have a higher treatment failure rate than closed fractures.

Hypothesis 2c: Lower extremity fractures will have a higher treatment failure rate than upper extremity fractures.

Hypothesis 2d: Multiple organism infections will have a higher treatment failure rate than single organism infections.

Hypothesis 2e: Gram positive infections will have a higher treatment failure rate than gram negative infections.

Hypothesis 2f: Revision fixation with IMN and treatment failure will be non-inferior to the rate of treatment failure in revision fixation with plates.

Hypothesis 2g: Revision fixation with external fixation and treatment failure will be non-inferior to the rate of treatment failure in revision fixation with IMN or plates.

Hypothesis 2h: One Stage revision fixation strategies will be non-inferior to the rate of treatment failure in Two Staged revision fixation strategies

Study design: At time of treatment for infected nonunion, patients will be randomized to oral (PO) antibiotics group or intravenous (IV) antibiotics group. Patients will receive PO or IV antibiotics for 6 weeks at discharge from the hospitalization to treat the infected nonunion. Both groups will otherwise receive standard care treatment by attending orthopedic surgeon and healthcare team, including debridement and soft tissue coverage of wounds; laboratory evaluation of inflammatory markers at 2 weeks, and 6 weeks; clinical follow at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months to assess recurrence of wound infection; and radiographic follow up at 6 weeks and 3 months or until boney union is confirmed.

Follow-Up: Assessments at baseline and at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months following hospital discharge will determine rates of re-hospitalization, treatment failure, infection, nonunion and amputation and patient compliance with antibiotic treatment.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

250

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Indiana
      • Indianapolis, Indiana, United States, 46202
        • Recruiting
        • Indiana University
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Roman Natoli, MD
    • Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21201
        • Recruiting
        • University of Maryland , MD Department of Orthopaedics
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Robert O'Toole, MD
        • Contact:
    • Minnesota
      • Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States, 55487
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Hennepin Health
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Andrew Schmidt, MD
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10003
    • North Carolina
      • Charlotte, North Carolina, United States, 28207
      • Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States, 27106
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Wake Forest University Baptist Medical Center
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Sharon Babock, MD
    • Pennsylvania
      • Hershey, Pennsylvania, United States, 17033
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Penn State University M.S. Hershey Medical Center
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • J. Spence Reid, MD
    • Tennessee
      • Nashville, Tennessee, United States, 37203
        • Recruiting
        • Vanderbilt Medical Center
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • William Obremskey, MD
    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
        • Not yet recruiting
        • University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Warner Stephen, MD
    • Washington
      • Seattle, Washington, United States, 98195
        • Not yet recruiting
        • University of Washington Harborview Medical Center
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Michael Githens, MD
    • Wisconsin
      • Madison, Wisconsin, United States, 53705
        • Recruiting
        • University of Wisconsin
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Paul Whiting, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Nonunion of a fracture that has previously undergone fixation. A Nonunion is defined as unplanned surgery with the primary purpose to promote union based on clinical/radiographic evidence >3 months after last fixation
  2. Infection as determined by either

    1. FRI criteria
    2. CDC criteria (without the timeframe) This includes the possibility of culture negative, but determined to be infection by treating surgeon
  3. Systemic antibiotic treatment regimen scheduled for at least 6 weeks

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with a high risk of amputation based on the initial managing physician
  2. Patients undergoing treatment of any other investigational therapy within the month preceding infection treatment or planned within the 12 months following infection treatment
  3. Incarcerated or institutionalized patients
  4. Patients who are unable to return for required follow-up visits and/or medical co-morbidities which preclude treatment with a general anesthetic
  5. Patients with a prior history of chronic infection at the index site before fracture fixation
  6. Patients with pathological fractures from a neoplastic process
  7. History of Paget's Disease
  8. The patient, or a designated proxy, unwilling to provide consent
  9. The patient must be available for follow-up for at least 12 months following infection treatment

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Standard of Care PO (oral) antibiotics
An intervention in this study includes randomization of patients with an infected nonunion to standard of care PO (oral) antibiotics for up to 6 weeks post hospitalization. No medications will be provided by the study. Study participants will be prescribed their oral antibiotics by their treating physician and the specific type will depend on their infection diagnosis. Medications will be obtained using health insurance and/or resources available at the treating facility therefore the mode of antibiotics utilized as standard of care will vary across participating sites. Sites will follow their standard of care delivery for antibiotics and the study will defer to this standard.
An intervention in this study includes randomization of patients with an infected nonunion to PO (oral) antibiotics for up to 6 weeks post hospitalization. The exact type of oral antibiotic will be depended on the patient's infection diagnosis.
Active Comparator: Standard of Care Intravenous (IV) antibiotics
An intervention in this study includes randomization of patients with an infected nonunion to intravenous (IV) antibiotics for up to 6 weeks post hospitalization. No medications will be provided by the study. Study participants will be prescribed their IV antibiotics by their treating physician and the specific type will depend on their infection diagnosis. Medications will be obtained using health insurance and/or resources available at the treating facility therefore the mode of antibiotics utilized as standard of care will vary across participating sites. Sites will follow their standard of care delivery for antibiotics and the study will defer to this standard.
An intervention in this study includes randomization of patients with an infected nonunion to intravenous (IV) antibiotics for up to 6 weeks post hospitalization. The exact type of IV antibiotic will be depended on the patient's infection diagnosis.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of patients with a hospital re-admission
Time Frame: 1 year
Total number of re-admissions after revision fixation over the first 365 days post discharge from the hospitalization for initial surgical treatment of the infected nonunion. Re-admission can be for infection, nonunion, soft tissue revision, line complication, or antibiotic complication.
1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of patients with treatment failure
Time Frame: 1 year

Treatment Failure will define as patients with the following complications:

  • Wound problems requiring surgery
  • Patients that have culture positive recurrence of infection
  • Progressive radiographic loosening of the implant
  • Joint erosion due to infection
  • Infection with a new organism
  • Adverse reactions to any of the antibiotics
  • Infection recurrence
  • Persistent Nonunion
1 year
Number of patients with a re-hospitalization for a complication
Time Frame: 1 year

Re-hospitalization for Complication is defined as:

  1. any re-admission to the hospital secondary to the treatment of the deep wound infection associated with the index fracture fixation for a defined set of complications. The list of complications includes: nonunion, amputation, infection, flap failure, , This definition has successfully been used by the core centers in previous published prospective studies and is consistent with the data used to generate the study power estimate.
  2. any complication of IV access requiring rehospitalization including, but not limited to line sepsis, DVT in same extremity as IV access, pneumothorax, or line change due to malfunction.
1 year
Number of patients with an additional infection
Time Frame: 1 year
Infection will be assessed either as systemic inflammation or surgical site infection.
1 year
Number of patients that experienced amputation
Time Frame: 1 year
Amputation is defined as surgical procedure to remove part of an extremity due to persistent infection or nonunion on proximal to site on affected extremity.
1 year
Medical Costs
Time Frame: 1 year
Medical Costs for the index hospitalization and subsequent hospitalizations (within one year) will be derived using hospital bills and professional fee charges. Costs will be calculated from charges at the revenue center/cost department line level using cost-to-charge ratios (CCRs) computed from the Medicare Cost Reports (MCRs) specific to the hospital and fiscal year of the hospital stay. Of particular interest will be charges and costs associated with the surgical procedures for bone grafting (control and treatment), days hospitalized, and costs for subsequent admissions for complications.
1 year
Patient Reported Outcomes
Time Frame: 1 year
Patient Report Outcomes Measurement Information System Computer Adaptive Test item banks, a product of the NIH Roadmap for Medical Research. CATs present an advantage over traditional measures in that they target only the most relevant items to each patient and can thus be used to obtain precise measurements with 4-6 items, making assessment across multiple domains feasible. CATs can also extend the ceiling and floor of individual domains, potentially enhancing responsiveness. At any visit if a CAT cannot be administered, respondents will instead complete the appropriate short forms associated with the CAT measure. In this study the following PROMIS domains will be used: Physical function, & Pain Inference in addition to PROMIS Global. Scores are measured on a T-score metric from 0-100 with 50 being the mean and standard deviation of 10 in the general U.S. population. Scores are categorized as: 0-30 severe, 31-40 moderate, 41-50 mild, and 51 and greater within normal limits.
1 year
Physical and Psychosocial Function Assessment
Time Frame: 1 year
Physical and Psychosocial Function Assessment including measurements of symptoms, functioning, and healthcare-related quality of life will be assessed using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System PROMIS Global-10. The PROMIS Global-10 short form consists of 10 items that assess general domains of health and functioning including overall physical health, mental health, social health, pain, fatigue, and overall perceived quality of life. PROMIS Global-10 scoring allows each of the individual items to be examined separately to provide specific information about perceptions of physical function, pain, fatigue, emotional distress, social health and general perceptions of health. Scores are measured on a T-score metric from 0-100 with 50 being the mean and standard deviation of 10 in the general U.S. population. Scores are categorized as: 0-30 severe, 31-40 moderate, 41-50 mild, and 51 and greater within normal limits.
1 year
Adherence
Time Frame: 6 months
Adherence will be measured by the Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS-8) which is an widely used 8-item expansion of the 4-item Morisky Medication Adherence Scale. The MMAS-8 an 8-item structured, self-report measure that assesses medication adherence. The questions 1-7 require a dichotomous reply and address the common reasons for missing medications. Question 8 is measured using a 5-point Likert scale and addresses difficulty of remembering to take medications. Scores are summed from 0-8 with a 6 or more being considered as adherent to the medications.
6 months
Compliance
Time Frame: 6 months
Compliance will also be measured by percent of doses of medication taken. If less than 80% of doses of any antibiotic medication is taken then patient will be considered non-compliant. Compliance will be evaluated as a continuous variable.
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: William Obremskey, MD, Vanderbilt Medical Center
  • Principal Investigator: Renan Castillo, PhD, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 30, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 29, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 11, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 24, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

January 26, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 28, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 26, 2024

Last Verified

March 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Infections

Clinical Trials on Standard of Care PO (oral) antibiotics

3
Subscribe