Self- Administered Acupressure for Diarrhea Predominant Irritable Bowel Syndrome

April 27, 2024 updated by: Maha Gamal Ramadan Asal, Alexandria University

Effect of Self- Administered Acupressure on Diarrhea Predominant Irritable Bowel Syndrome Patients' Health Outcomes: a Double Blind- Sham Controlled Randomized Clinical Trial

This study aims to assess the effect of active self- administered acupressure compared to sham self- administered acupressure on the health outcome for patient with diarrhea predominant Irritable Bowel Syndrome

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Research suggests promising benefits of acupuncture in terms of symptom control and quality of life improvements in patients with irritable bowel syndrome. but the cost of the needle and the invasive nature of the procedure decreases patient compliance with acupuncture. in this respect, acupressure can be taught to patients to allow them to perform it themselves, instead of being administered by practitioners. Self-administered acupressure is less time-intensive, low-cost, and flexible to perform. Nurses involved in irritable bowel syndrome patient care play an active role in the practitioner-patient relationship By assessing the specific symptoms that are present, determining the severity of symptoms and the impact on the irritable bowel syndrome patient's life, and being knowledgeable of available treatment options, the nurse involved in irritable bowel syndrome care becomes an essential conduit of information and a valuable facilitator of a positive practitioner-patient therapeutic relationship. In this way, nurses can help to limit the negative consequences of this common disorder and improve overall treatment outcomes in this population. . Thus this study will be conducted to assess the effectiveness of active self-administered acupressure on diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

70

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Alexandria, Egypt
        • outpatient clinics of Main University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosed with diarrhea irritable bowel syndrome symptoms following Rome IV diagnostic criteria
  • Agreed to be on a fixed dose of the pharmacological therapy throughout the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with severe lesions in major organs such as the heart, liver, and kidney, hematopoietic diseases, or tumors
  • Eating disorders
  • History of major abdominal surgery
  • History of neurological and mental illness
  • Usage of other treatment rather than the medical treatment regularly 2 weeks before randomization and throughout the study
  • Previous history of drug or alcohol abuse 6 months before randomization
  • Pregnant and lactating women.
  • Patient reporting of adequate relief of their irritable bowel syndrome symptoms the week preceding the randomization
  • Patient has too mild symptoms ( obtaining less than 75 on Irritable bowel syndrome symptoms severity scale at the baseline assessment)
  • Currently participating in other clinical trials

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Active acupoints group
All participants in the active group will be treated with basic acupoints Zhongwan (CV 12), Tianshu (ST25) in alternation with Sanyinjiao (SP 6), Zusanli (ST 36). Moreover according to traditional Chinese medicine diagnosis, additional acupoints will be added. The frequency of acupressure treatment will be twice a day for 4 weeks, in total 56 sets.
Participants will receive training (2 sessions, 2 days a part) by a training researcher. Patients will be taught on the acupoints location and the acupressure technique. Participants will be verified for the correct location of the acupoints, acupressure technique and strength. Participants will be instructed to use thumb or middle finger to self- press each acupoint using circular movements. The force of pressing must be sufficiently strong but still within a comfortable range. A lubricant will be uses to decrease friction between the acupoints and the finger. Follow up evaluation will be at the end of the week 2 and week 4 .The training researcher will make weekly calls to remind participants to perform acupressure and to answer questions
Sham Comparator: Sham acupoints group
All participants on the sham acupoints group will recieive sham Zhongwan (CV 12), sham Tianshu (ST25), sham Sanyinjiao (SP 6), and sham Zusanli (ST 36) acupressure. All the sham points are 2 cm outside and parallel to the actual points which do not match any recognized acupuncture points and are thought to have no therapeutic effect. The frequency of acupressure treatment will be twice a day for 4 weeks, in total 56 sets.
The same protocol as the active acupressure group.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Baseline mean of irritable Bowel Syndrome Symptom Severity Score
Time Frame: Immediately before assigning the participants to the study groups
It is five item questionnaire measuring frequency and intensity of abdominal pain, the severity of abdominal distension, dissatisfaction with bowel habits, and the interference of IBS with daily life. Subjects respond to each question on a 100-point visual analogue scale. The total score ranges from 0 to 500. Subjects can be categorized as having mild (75-175), moderate (175-300), or severe (>300) disease
Immediately before assigning the participants to the study groups
Change from the baseline irritable Bowel Syndrome Symptom Severity Score at 2 weeks
Time Frame: after 2 weeks from the baseline
t is five item questionnaire measuring frequency and intensity of abdominal pain, the severity of abdominal distension, dissatisfaction with bowel habits, and the interference of IBS with daily life. Subjects respond to each question on a 100-point visual analogue scale. The total score ranges from 0 to 500. Subjects can be categorized as having mild (75-175), moderate (175-300), or severe (>300) disease
after 2 weeks from the baseline
Change from the baseline irritable Bowel Syndrome Symptom Severity Score at 4 weeks
Time Frame: after 4 weeks from the baseline
t is five item questionnaire measuring frequency and intensity of abdominal pain, the severity of abdominal distension, dissatisfaction with bowel habits, and the interference of IBS with daily life. Subjects respond to each question on a 100-point visual analogue scale. The total score ranges from 0 to 500. Subjects can be categorized as having mild (75-175), moderate (175-300), or severe (>300) disease
after 4 weeks from the baseline
Irritable Bowel Syndrome Adequate Relief question
Time Frame: At the baseline
It is a dichotomous single item that asks participants "Over the past week have you had adequate relief of your irritable Bowel Syndrome symptoms?" . A responder was defined as a patient who answered this question affirmatively.
At the baseline
Irritable Bowel Syndrome Adequate Relief question
Time Frame: After 2 weeks from the baseline
It is a dichotomous single item that asks participants "Over the past week have you had adequate relief of your irritable Bowel Syndrome symptoms?" . A responder was defined as a patient who answered this question affirmatively.
After 2 weeks from the baseline
Irritable Bowel Syndrome Adequate Relief question
Time Frame: After 4 weeks from the baseline
It is a dichotomous single item that asks participants "Over the past week have you had adequate relief of your irritable Bowel Syndrome symptoms?" . A responder was defined as a patient who answered this question affirmatively.
After 4 weeks from the baseline
Mean stool frequency after 2 weeks
Time Frame: After 2 weeks from the patient endorsement
Defined by the bi-weekly change of frequency of defecation,patient will report the number of defecation per day to calculate it.
After 2 weeks from the patient endorsement
Mean change of stool frequency after 4 weeks
Time Frame: After 4 weeks from the patient endorsement
Defined by the bi-weekly change of frequency of defecation,patient will report the number of defecation per day to calculate it.
After 4 weeks from the patient endorsement
Stool consistency
Time Frame: at the baseline
Defined by the Bristol Stool Form Scale, It is an ordinal scale of stool types ranging from the hardest (Type 1) to the softest (Type 7). Types 1 and2 are considered to be abnormally hard stools while Types 6 and 7 are considered abnormally loose/liquid stools. Type 3, 4 and 5 are considered to be the most normal stool type
at the baseline
Change in the frequency of stool consistency at 2 weeks from the baseline
Time Frame: after 2 weeks from baseline
defined by the Bristol Stool Form Scale
after 2 weeks from baseline
Change in the frequency of stool consistency at 4 weeks from the baseline
Time Frame: after 4 weeks
Defined by the Bristol Stool Form Scale, It is an ordinal scale of stool types ranging from the hardest (Type 1) to the softest (Type 7). Types 1 and2 are considered to be abnormally hard stools while Types 6 and 7 are considered abnormally loose/liquid stools. Type 3, 4 and 5 are considered to be the most normal stool type
after 4 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Demographic and clinical data
Time Frame: before assignment of the participants to the study groups
A questionnaire will be developed to collect data about participants' age, gender, body mass index, physical activity status, diet, smoking status, medication used.
before assignment of the participants to the study groups
the baseline mean of psychological distress measured by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale
Time Frame: at the baseline
the scale contains 14 items, seven statements on each sub-scale which assess symptoms experienced during the past week on four-point rating scale (0 to 3); a higher score depicts a worse condition. For each sub-scale the maximum score is 21. A score of ≥11 is considered a clinically significant disorder, whereas a score between 8 and 10 suggests a mild disorder
at the baseline
Change from the baseline mean of the psychological distress measured by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale at 4 weeks
Time Frame: after 4 weeks from the baseline
the scale contains 14 items, seven statements on each sub-scale which assess symptoms experienced during the past week on four-point rating scale (0 to 3); a higher score depicts a worse condition. For each sub-scale the maximum score is 21. A score of ≥11 is considered a clinically significant disorder, whereas a score between 8 and 10 suggests a mild disorder
after 4 weeks from the baseline
Baseline mean of the quality of Life
Time Frame: at the baseline
it will be measured by the irritable bowel syndrome quality of Life questionnaire. It consists of 34 items that assess the degree to which irritable bowel syndrome disturbed quality of life for a subject over the past 30 days through eight sub-scales. Each item is rated on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 to 5 with higher values indicating a lower quality of life.
at the baseline
Change from the baseline mean of the quality of life at 4 weeks
Time Frame: Four weeks after the baseline assessment
it will be measured by the irritable bowel syndrome quality of Life questionnaire. It consists of 34 items that assess the degree to which irritable bowel syndrome disturbed quality of life for a subject over the past 30 days through eight sub-scales. Each item is rated on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 to 5 with higher values indicating a lower quality of life.
Four weeks after the baseline assessment
Related adverse Events
Time Frame: from the patients endorsement till one week after study completion
An unfavorable change in the health of a participants that happens during a clinical study or within a week after the study has ended. This change may or may not be caused by the acupressure.
from the patients endorsement till one week after study completion
Adherence to the to active and sham self-administered acupressure of the study.
Time Frame: throughout study completion, an average of 4 months
The adherence will be calculated as percentage of planned sessions of acupressure, and adherence rate above 80% was set as a minimum requirement to be regarded as acceptable
throughout study completion, an average of 4 months
use of rescue medicine
Time Frame: throughout study completion, an average of 4 months
participants will be asked to report the use of rescue medicine for diarrhea or gastrointestinal symptoms
throughout study completion, an average of 4 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Zahraa H Ramzy, Phd, Alexandria University
  • Principal Investigator: Rasha F Ahmed, Phd, Alexandria University
  • Principal Investigator: Maha G Asal, Phd, Alexandria University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 5, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 28, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

August 28, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 7, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 18, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

January 27, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 30, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 27, 2024

Last Verified

April 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Diarrhea

Clinical Trials on Active acupressure

3
Subscribe