BIOlogic Augmented Repair of Complex Anal Fistula Using Acellular Matrix and/or Autologous Platelet-rich Plasma (BIO RAMP)

April 5, 2023 updated by: Jeff Van Eps, MD, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston

The BIO RAMP Trial - BIOlogic Augmented Repair of Complex Anal Fistula Using Acellular Matrix and/or Autologous Platelet-rich Plasma

The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical effectiveness of augmenting surgical repair of complex anal fistula using autologous PRP and/or micronized acellular porcine urinary bladder matrix (UBM) to usual surgical care alone to prevent fistula recurrence or improve HRQoL, to compare the effects of augmenting surgical repair of complex anal fistula using autologous PRP and/or micronized acellular porcine urinary bladder matrix on early postoperative pain and fecal continence and to assess the cost utility of augmented complex fistula repair relative to usual surgical care

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

250

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • complex cryptoglandular transsphincteric anal fistula undergoing surgical repair by LIFT or advancement flap procedure
  • English or Spanish speaking and capable of providing informed consent
  • Willing to undergo temporary anal seton drainage for requisite time prior to repair
  • Participating surgeons will only be eligible if they perform at least 3 repair procedures/year

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unable to reliably complete follow up for 12 months postoperatively
  • Primary platelet disorders
  • Thrombocytopenia < 150 plt/microliter
  • Inability to stop anti-platelet agent > 5 days preoperatively
  • Fistula associated with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), malignancy or pelvic/perineal radiation

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Sham Comparator: Surgery
Control patients will receive usual standard of care surgical repair of their complex fistula by The ligation of intersphincteric tract (LIFT) or advancement flap technique without any biologic adjunct.
Control patients will receive usual standard of care surgical repair of their complex fistula by LIFT or advancement flap technique without any biologic adjunct.
Experimental: Surgery plus platelet-rich plasma (PRP)
Control patients will receive usual standard of care surgical repair of their complex fistula by LIFT or advancement flap technique without any biologic adjunct.
Participants will have 40-50cc of peripheral whole blood drawn into a syringe pre-loaded with acid citrate dextrose (ACD) anticoagulant and concentrated PRP harvested by double centrifugation technique using the manufacturer's kit and benchtop centrifuge. This typically yields 5-8cc of PRP that is 18-times more concentrated than baseline.
Experimental: Surgery plus matrix
Control patients will receive usual standard of care surgical repair of their complex fistula by LIFT or advancement flap technique without any biologic adjunct.
Participants will receive 200g of "paste" matrix and 200g injected at the following sites: the internal opening closure site at level of the sphincter muscle, within the walls of the fistula tract along its length, and within the tissue of an advancement flap particularly at areas of tissue apposition.
Experimental: Surgery plus PRP plus matrix material
Control patients will receive usual standard of care surgical repair of their complex fistula by LIFT or advancement flap technique without any biologic adjunct.
Participants will have 40-50cc of peripheral whole blood drawn into a syringe pre-loaded with acid citrate dextrose (ACD) anticoagulant and concentrated PRP harvested by double centrifugation technique using the manufacturer's kit and benchtop centrifuge. This typically yields 5-8cc of PRP that is 18-times more concentrated than baseline.
Participants will receive 200g of "paste" matrix and 200g injected at the following sites: the internal opening closure site at level of the sphincter muscle, within the walls of the fistula tract along its length, and within the tissue of an advancement flap particularly at areas of tissue apposition.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of participants with fistula recurrence
Time Frame: upto 6 months after surgery
A fistula recurrence is defined as one or more of the following clinical signs or symptoms after repair: recurrent abscess at the site of repair, chronic drainage or passage of flatus from an external opening of the perineum away from the anal verge, a non-healing external opening that tracks toward anus by probing with fistula probe.
upto 6 months after surgery
Change in Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) as assessed by the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire
Time Frame: Baseline, 1week post surgery, 2 weeks post surgery, 6 weeks post surgery, 3 months post surgery, 6 months post surgery, and 12 months post surgery.
This instrument queries subjects on health status related to mobility, self-care, 'usual' activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression with 5 potential responses ranging from "no problems" to inability to complete the task or extreme levels of pain/depression, correlating to a discrete index score from 1-5, a higher number indicating a worse outcome.The instrument also includes an overall VAS self-rating of health ranging from 0-100, higher number indicating better health.
Baseline, 1week post surgery, 2 weeks post surgery, 6 weeks post surgery, 3 months post surgery, 6 months post surgery, and 12 months post surgery.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of participants who have post operative pain as assessed by the visual analog scale (VAS)
Time Frame: 14 days after surgery
This is scored from 0-100, higher number indicating better health
14 days after surgery
Change in fecal continence as assessed by the Cleveland Clinic Fecal Incontinence (CCFI) scoring tool
Time Frame: Baseline, 2 weeks after surgery,6 weeks after surgery,3 months after surgery,6 months after surgery and 12 months after surgery

This is a 5 item questionnaire that assesses type of incontinence (solid, liquid, gas, wears pad, lifestyle alteration).

The frequency with which each type of incontinence occurs is rated on a scale from 0 (never) to 4 (always or to 1/day). The sum of the frequencies is added to yield a total score that can range from 0 to 20, with higher scores indicating higher levels of incontinence.

Baseline, 2 weeks after surgery,6 weeks after surgery,3 months after surgery,6 months after surgery and 12 months after surgery
The relative cost utility of the different treatment strategies as assessed by a questionnaire
Time Frame: 12 months after surgery
A cost effectiveness analysis (CEA) will be done from the healthcare system perspective assessed as the incremental health system costs (or savings) per fistula recurrence prevented
12 months after surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jeffrey L Van Eps, MD, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 21, 2023

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

February 28, 2026

Study Completion (Anticipated)

March 31, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 16, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 5, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

April 10, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 10, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 5, 2023

Last Verified

April 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Anal Fistula

Clinical Trials on Surgery

3
Subscribe