IVUS Versus FFR for Non-infarct Related Artery Lesions in Patients With Multivessel Disease and Acute STEMI (FRAME-AMI2)

November 24, 2023 updated by: Joo-Yong Hahn, Samsung Medical Center

Randomized Controlled Trial of Intravascular Ultrasound Versus Fractional Flow Reserve for Non-infarct Related Artery Lesions in Patients With Multivessel Disease and Acute STEMI

The aim of the study is to compare clinical outcomes between intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided treatment decision versus fractional flow reserve (FFR)-guided treatment decision for non-infarct related artery stenosis in patients with ST-segment elevation MI (STEMI) and multivessel disease.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The treatment of choice of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is acute reperfusion therapy, preferably with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). While need of treating the infarct related artery (IRA) is obvious, need for routine revascularization of non-infarct related artery (non-IRA) has been a topic of debate until recent years. Through a number of observational studies, randomized trials and meta-analyses, the benefits of non-IRA PCI have been continuously implied, and COMPLETE trial with 4041 patients of STEMI and multivessel coronary artery disease in 2019 demonstrated superiority of complete revascularization to culprit-only PCI in terms of cardiovascular death or MI (primary end point) and cardiovascular death, MI, or ischemia-driven revascularization (co-primary end point).8 As such, complete revascularization of a significant non-IRA stenosis is recommended after successful primary PCI in STEMI patients in current clinical guidelines.

Nevertheless, it has been unclear which criteria should be used to decide non-IRA PCI. Although potential significance of non-IRA lesions can be estimated by angiography, the limitation of angiographic visual assessment or quantitative coronary angiography has been well known. Various measurements are used for incremental information in addition to angiographic assessment in guiding PCI - namely, intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and fractional flow reserve (FFR).

IVUS provides anatomical information regarding the lumen, plaque, and plaque characteristics, and can optimize stent placement minimizing stent-related problems and lead to better clinical outcomes. On the other hand, FFR provides information on amount of ischemia which the stenosis in question is causing, and also improves the quality of PCI which has been demonstrated by multiple previous trials, and current practice guidelines recommend the use of FFR to determine revascularization strategy as Class IA recommendation. Recent trials evaluated comparative prognosis between FFR-guided versus angiograph-guided PCI for non-IRA in patients with acute MI and multivessel disease. FLOWER-MI trial showed comparable clinical outcome between FFR-guided versus angiography-guided PCI for non-IRA in STEMI patients at 1-year follow-up. FRAME-AMI trial showed superiority of FFR-guided PCI over angiography-guided PCI in reducing death, MI, or repeat revascularization during median 3.5 years of follow-up.

Although IVUS and FFR differ in underlying basic concepts, previous studies demonstrated clinical outcomes following treatment decision by IVUS and FFR was similar between the 2 groups. However, these studies mainly evaluated low-risk stable ischemic heart disease patients with intermediate stenosis, and does not reflect population with acute myocardial infarction undergoing complete revascularization. Currently, the data directly comparing the benefit of IVUS and FFR for non-IRA PCI in STEMI is lacking. Considering that coronary atherosclerotic plaque in non-IRA of STEMI patients is associated with significantly higher risk of future clinical events, IVUS would have potential strength of detecting high risk plaque in non-IRA and treatment decision based on plaque characteristics. Conversely, FFR-guided treatment decision for non-IRA would detect functionally significant non-IRA stenosis and treatment decision based on functional significance would reduce unnecessary PCI, as demonstrated by previous trials.

In this regard, randomized controlled trial comparing clinical outcome following non-IRA PCI in STEMI patients with multivessel disease guided by IVUS or FFR would provide valuable evidence to enhance patient's prognosis after treatment of STEMI. Therefore, FRAME-AMI 2 trial is designed to compare clinical outcomes after non-IRA PCI using either IVUS-guided or FFR-guided strategy.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

1400

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Gwangju, Korea, Republic of
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Chonnam National University
        • Contact:
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Seung Hun Lee, MD, PhD
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Young Joon Hong, MD, PhD
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of
        • Recruiting
        • Samsung Medical Center
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Joo-Yong Hahn, MD, PhD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Joo Myung Lee, MD, MPH, PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subject must be at least 19 years of age
  • Acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI)

    *STEMI: ST-segment elevation ≥0.1 mV in ≥2 contiguous leads or documented newly developed left bundle-branch block1

  • Successful primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for IRA in <12 h after the onset of symptoms
  • Multivessel disease (at least one stenosis of >50% in a non-IRA ≥2.25 mm by visual estimation)
  • Subject is able to verbally confirm understandings of risks, benefits and treatment alternatives of receiving invasive physiologic evaluation and PCI and he/she or his/her legally authorized representative provides written informed consent prior to any study related procedure.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Non-IRA stenosis not amenable for PCI treatment by operators' decision
  • Cardiogenic shock (Killip class IV) already at presentation or the completion of IRA PCI
  • Intolerance to Aspirin, Clopidogrel, Prasugrel, Ticagrelor, Heparin, or Everolimus
  • Known true anaphylaxis to contrast medium (not allergic reaction but anaphylactic shock)
  • Pregnancy or breast feeding
  • Non-cardiac co-morbid conditions are present with life expectancy <2 year or that may result in protocol non-compliance (per site investigator's medical judgment)
  • Other primary valvular disease with severe degree: severe mitral regurgitation, mitral stenosis, severe aortic regurgitation, or aortic stenosis
  • Unwillingness or inability to comply with the procedures described in this protocol.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Fractional flow reserve-guided PCI
FFR measurement for non-IRA stenosis (>50% visual estimation) will be performed by continuous infusion of adenosine (140~180 ug/kg/min) or intracoronary nicorandil (2 mg bolus) injection. The FFR ≤0.80 will be targeted for PCI. In case of non-IRA stenosis >90%, we will judge FFR value of ≤0.80.
In FFR-guided PCI group, FFR measurement for non-IRA stenosis (>50% visual estimation) will be performed by continuous infusion of adenosine (140~180 ug/kg/min) or intracoronary nicorandil (2 mg bolus) injection. The FFR ≤0.80 will be targeted for PCI. In case of non-IRA stenosis >90%, we will judge FFR value of ≤0.80.
Experimental: Intravascular Ultrasound-guided PCI

In IVUS-guided PCI group, the current trial evaluates clinical outcome following IVUS-guided treatment decision for revascularization of non-IRA stenosis. According to pre-defined criteria, the decision of revascularization will be made.

Revascularization criteria in the IVUS-guided PCI group is 1) minimal lumen area (MLA) ≤ 3mm2 or 2) 3mm2 < MLA ≤4mm2 and plaque burden >70%.

In IVUS-guided PCI group, the current trial evaluates clinical outcome following IVUS-guided treatment decision for revascularization of non-IRA stenosis.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient-Oriented Composite Outcome
Time Frame: 2 years after last patient enrollment
a composite of death, myocardial infarction, or repeat revascularization
2 years after last patient enrollment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
All-cause death
Time Frame: 2 years after last patient enrollment
All-cause death
2 years after last patient enrollment
Cardiac death
Time Frame: 2 years after last patient enrollment
Cardiac death
2 years after last patient enrollment
Spontaneous myocardial infarction
Time Frame: 2 years after last patient enrollment
Spontaneous myocardial infarction, defined by Forth Universal definition of myocardial infarction
2 years after last patient enrollment
Procedure-related myocardial infarction
Time Frame: 2 years after last patient enrollment
Procedure-related myocardial infarction, defined by ARC II definition
2 years after last patient enrollment
Any revascularization
Time Frame: 2 years after last patient enrollment
Any revascularization (clinically-driven or ischemia-driven)
2 years after last patient enrollment
Infarct-related artery revascularization
Time Frame: 2 years after last patient enrollment
Infarct-related artery revascularization
2 years after last patient enrollment
Non-Infarct-related artery revascularization
Time Frame: 2 years after last patient enrollment
Non-Infarct-related artery revascularization
2 years after last patient enrollment
Definite or probable stent thrombosis
Time Frame: 2 years after last patient enrollment
Definite or probable stent thrombosis
2 years after last patient enrollment
Stroke (ischemic or hemorrhagic)
Time Frame: 2 years after last patient enrollment
Stroke (ischemic or hemorrhagic)
2 years after last patient enrollment
Total procedural time
Time Frame: at least 1 week after index procedure
Total procedural time (from the end of primary PCI for IRA to the completion of non-IRA PCI including amount of staged procedure)
at least 1 week after index procedure
Total fluoroscopy time
Time Frame: at least 1 week after index procedure
Total fluoroscopy time (from the end of primary PCI for IRA to the completion of non-IRA PCI including amount of staged procedure)
at least 1 week after index procedure
Total amount of contrast use
Time Frame: at least 1 week after index procedure
Total amount of contrast use (from the end of primary PCI for IRA to the completion of non-IRA PCI including amount of staged procedure)
at least 1 week after index procedure
Incidence of contrast-induced nephropathy
Time Frame: at least 1 week after index procedure
Incidence of contrast-induced nephropathy, defined as an increase in serum creatinine of ≥0.5mg/dL or ≥25% from baseline within 48-72 hours after contrast agent exposure.
at least 1 week after index procedure
A composite of all-cause death or myocardial infarction
Time Frame: 2 years after last patient enrollment
A composite of all-cause death or myocardial infarction
2 years after last patient enrollment
A composite of cardiac death or non-procedure-related myocardial infarction
Time Frame: 2 years after last patient enrollment
A composite of cardiac death or non-procedure-related myocardial infarction
2 years after last patient enrollment
Angina severity by Seattle Angina Questionnaire
Time Frame: At 2 years from index procedure
Angina severity by Seattle Angina Questionnaire
At 2 years from index procedure
Quality of life by EQ-5D-5L Questionnaire
Time Frame: At 2 years from index procedure
Quality of life by EQ-5D-5L Questionnaire
At 2 years from index procedure

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Young Joon Hong, MD, PhD, Chonnam National University
  • Principal Investigator: Joo-Yong Hahn, MD, PhD, Samsung Medical Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 18, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2029

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 22, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 13, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

April 14, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 27, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 24, 2023

Last Verified

November 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

After publication of main paper, de-identified data will be shared upon reasonable requests after discussion by Executive Committee.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

After publication of main paper.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Executive Committee will discuss to share the de-identified data upon reasonable requests.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction

Clinical Trials on FFR-guided PCI group

3
Subscribe