Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Treatment-Decision and Evaluation of Significant Left MAIN Coronary Artery Disease (FATE-MAIN)

April 24, 2024 updated by: Seung-Jung Park

A Comparison of Fractional Flow Reserve- Versus Angiography-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Left Main Coronary Artery Disease

The primary purpose of the study was to determine whether the 2-year probability of major adverse cardiac events (primary composite outcome) differed significantly between patients who underwent angiography-guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention(PCI) and those who underwent Fractional Flow Reserve(FFR)-guided PCI in patients with Left Main Coronary Artery disease(LMCA).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

All participants will be monitored over a span of two years and the time point of the year of last subject last visit. The term "year of last subject last visit" refers to the time point of the last visit for all participants. At this specific time point, event occurrence check will be conducted to determine the occurrence of endpoint events among all participants.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

934

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Songpa-gu
      • Seoul, Songpa-gu, Korea, Republic of, 138-736
        • Recruiting
        • Asan Medical Center
        • Contact:
          • Seung-jung Park, MD, PhD
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Seung-jung Park, MD, PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. The subject must be ≥20 years of age with angina and/or evidence of myocardial ischemia.
  2. Significant de novo LMCA disease, defined as ≥ 50% diameter stenosis by visual estimation with or without concomitant non-left main major epicardial coronary artery disease, amenable to PCI with drug-eluting stent(DES) implantation.
  3. The patient or guardian agrees to the study protocol and the schedule of clinical follow-up, and provides informed, written consent, as approved by the appropriate Institutional Review Board/Ethical Committee of the respective clinical site.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Extremely calcified or tortuous vessels precluding FFR measurement.
  2. The presence of complex coronary disease anatomy or lesion characteristics or other cardiac condition(s) which leads the participating interventional cardiologist to believe that PCI is not suitable (i.e. the subject should be managed with coronary artery bypass graft or medical therapy alone).
  3. Recent ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction(<7 days prior to randomization).
  4. Cardiogenic shock and/or need for mechanical/pharmacologic hemodynamic support.
  5. Severe left ventricular dysfunction (ejection fraction <30%).
  6. Requirement for other cardiac surgical procedure (e.g., valve replacement or aorta surgery).
  7. Contraindication or inability to take aspirin or P2Y12 inhibitors (clopidogrel, ticagrelor, or clopidogrel).
  8. Prior PCI of the left main trunk.
  9. Prior coronary artery bypass graft surgery.
  10. Subjects requiring or who may require additional surgery (cardiac or noncardiac) within 1 year.
  11. End-stage renal disease requiring renal replacement therapy.
  12. Liver cirrhosis.
  13. Pregnant and/or lactating women.
  14. Concurrent medical condition with a limited life expectancy of less than 2 years.
  15. Patients who are actively participating in another drug or device investigational study, which have not completed the primary endpoint follow-up period.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: FFR-guided Left Main PCI
Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided PCI
Active Comparator: Angiography-Guided PCI
Angiography-Guided PCI

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The composite event rate
Time Frame: 2 years

Composite event consists of death from any causes, myocardial infarction, or hospitalization for unstable angina, heart failure, or resuscitated cardiac arrest, or repeat revascularization.

A composite endpoint is an endpoint that is a combination of multiple clinical endpoints. An event is considered to have occurred if any one of several different events is observed.

2 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The event rate of stroke
Time Frame: 2 years
2 years
Procedure time
Time Frame: 1 day
1 day
Amount of contrast agent used
Time Frame: 1 day
1 day
Length of hospital stay
Time Frame: an average of 7 day
an average of 7 day
The event rate of death from any causes
Time Frame: 2 years
2 years
The event rate of myocardial infarction
Time Frame: 2 years
any, spontaneous or procedural myocardial infarction
2 years
The event rate of hospitalization for unstable angina, heart failure, or resuscitated cardiac arrest
Time Frame: 2 years
2 years
The event rate of repeat revascularization
Time Frame: 2 years
2 years
The composite event rate of death or myocardial infarction
Time Frame: 2 years
2 years
The event rate of stent thrombosis
Time Frame: 2 years
Stent thrombosis by Academic Research Consortium (ARC) definition
2 years
The event rate of bleeding complications
Time Frame: 2 years
Bleeding Academic Research Consortium [BARC] type 3-5, which indicates severe bleeding
2 years
The event rate of rehospitalization
Time Frame: 2 years
Rehospitalization from any, cardiac, or noncardiac causes
2 years
Functional class
Time Frame: 7 days(discharge) and 1, 6, 12, 24 months

Functional class assessed by the Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) Angina Score classification.

The minimum and maximum values are I and IV respectively and a higher score means a worse outcome.

7 days(discharge) and 1, 6, 12, 24 months
Change of angina-related quality of life index
Time Frame: 7 days(discharge) and 1, 6, 12, 24 months

By the Seattle Angina Questionnaire [SAQ].

the SAQ is a disease-specific patient-reported outcome (PRO) with 5 domains. Lower score represents poor health status and high score represents good health status.

7 days(discharge) and 1, 6, 12, 24 months
Change of health-related quality of life index
Time Frame: 7 days(discharge) and 1, 6, 12, 24 months

By the EQ-5D.

EQ-5D is a standardised measure of health-related quality of life developed by the EuroQol Group. Range 0 - 1 and a higher score of EQ-5D mean low quality of life.

7 days(discharge) and 1, 6, 12, 24 months
Number of anti-anginal medications
Time Frame: 7 days(discharge) and 1, 6, 12, 24 months
7 days(discharge) and 1, 6, 12, 24 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Duk-woo Park, MD, Asan Medical Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

April 25, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 30, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 13, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

April 26, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 26, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 24, 2024

Last Verified

April 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Coronary Artery Disease

Clinical Trials on FFR-Guided PCI

3
Subscribe