The Use Of FFR Guided PCI Versus Complete Revascularization and Treatment Of Infarct Related Artery Only In Patients With STEMI (FAIO)

December 21, 2015 updated by: A Abdullah, University of Limerick

Multi Centre Open Label Randomised Controlled Parallel-group Three Arm Trial To Compare The Use Of Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) Guided and Angiographically Guided Revascularization To The Treatment Of Infarct Related Artery Only In Patients With STEMI And Multivessel Disease

In patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) the treatment goal is revascularization of the occluded artery with the use of primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). There is a large subset of patients with STEMI who also have significant disease in arteries other than the site of occlusion, and away from the culprit artery. It is estimated that up to 50% have disease of more than 50% in the non-culprit arteries.

The evidence on how to treat those patients with multi vessel disease is conflicting. Earlier large-scale studies and registries have suggested early and complete revascularization is of no benefit or even harmful. More recent studies have showed the opposite of that. The CVLPRIT study showed that early complete revascularization or preventive PCI reduced primary endpoint of a composite of all cause mortality, myocardial infarction and need for repeat revascularization. The benefit was mainly due to reduced repeat revascularization in the more intensive intervention group. The PRAMI study showed very similar results as well.

The use of Fractional flow Reserve (FFR) in deciding complete revascularization has also showed conflicting results so far. A previous trial showed that FFR guided intervention post STEMI increased MACE. This was conflicted with more recent study, which showed FFR guided complete revascularization improved outcome when compared with more conservative treatment of ischaemia driven intervention.

In this study, the investigators are going to assess the issue of staged revascularization guided by FFR or by angiogram, compared to the standard treatment of ischaemia driven revascularization

Study Overview

Detailed Description

To compare the clinical outcomes measured by composite of mortality, myocardial infarction and repeat revascularization by using FFR guided and angiographically guided revascularization to the standard strategy of ischaemia driven revascularization.

Participants will be allocated to three arms, first conservative group of ischaemia guided PCI, second FFR guided PCI and third angiogram guided PCI where patients where patients with more than 50% lesion will undergo revascularization.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

560

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Galway, Ireland
        • Galway University Hospital
      • Limerick, Ireland, 000
        • University Hospital Limerick

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with STEMI and multi-vessel disease on initial angiogram.
  2. Above 18 years of age
  3. Able to give consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with indication for CABG
  2. Left main stem lesion of >50%
  3. Cardiogenic shock
  4. Intractable angina during hospital admission
  5. Patients with limited life expectancy
  6. Patients with severe chronic kidney disease
  7. Patients with contraindication to dual antiplatelet therapy
  8. Patients with very complex lesions that deemed not favourable for PCI
  9. Pregnancy or childbearing age

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Conservative
After the index primary PCI. The control group will receive best medical therapy and regular follow up and only PCI for recurrent angina with evidence of inducible ischaemia.
Active Comparator: FFR guided
FFR group will undergo FFR at 4 weeks of the index primary PCI as OPD. If FFR is less than 0.8, then PCI will be performed
Patients undergo Fractional Flow measurement (FFR) followed by PCI, if the FFR is less than 0.8
Active Comparator: angiogram guided
The group will undergo PCI for all significant lesions more than 50
Patients receive PCI without FFR measurement

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction and / or revascularization
Time Frame: 1 year
1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
stroke
Time Frame: 1 year
1 year
Myocardial infarction
Time Frame: 1 year
1 year
Cardiovascular morality
Time Frame: 1 year
1 year
Revascularization
Time Frame: 1 year
Revascularization procedure because of symptoms and evidence of ischaemia
1 year
Heart failure
Time Frame: 1 year
documented episode of presentation with symptoms consistent with heart failure and evidence from echocardiogram or laboratory test consistent with the diagnosis of heart failure
1 year
Costs
Time Frame: 1 year
total procedural costs, hospital stay costs, medications costs.
1 year

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Bleeding
Time Frame: 1 year
any major bleeding (TIMI 3)
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Thomas J Kiernan, MD, University Hospital of Limerick

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

December 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

November 1, 2019

Study Completion (Anticipated)

November 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 17, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 17, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

December 22, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

December 23, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 21, 2015

Last Verified

December 1, 2015

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on STEMI

Clinical Trials on FFR guided PCI

3
Subscribe