ClassIntra® for Better Outcomes in Surgery - CIBOSurg (CIBOSurg)

February 10, 2025 updated by: University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland

Implementation of Routine Recording of Intraoperative Adverse Events According to ClassIntra® During the Sign-out Phase of the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist Using a Multifaceted, Tailored Implementation Strategy: Protocol of a Collaborative Before- and After-cohort Project

Intra- and postoperative adverse events (iAEs and pAEs) occur in up to one third of all patients undergoing surgery. They are devastating to patients and costly to health care systems. Their number tends to increase due to the rising complexity of both the patient's risk profile and the surgical procedure. Postoperative deaths have been identified to be the third most frequent cause of death worldwide. Teamwork in surgery has been attributed to have a potentially great impact on avoiding postoperative morbidity. Up to 50% of all adverse in-hospital events were rated to be potentially preventable. However, their prevention typically requires a change in systems and individual behaviour. Standardised assessments of iAEs and pAEs are a prerequisite to develop and define strategies for prevention of AEs. While awareness of pAEs has highly risen through the introduction of the Clavien-Dindo classification, the most widely used classification for grading severity of pAEs, the relevance of transparent monitoring of iAEs is still highly undervalued.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

1800

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Nijmegen, Netherlands
        • Withdrawn
        • Radboud UMC
      • Basel, Switzerland
        • Completed
        • University Hospital Basel
      • Bern, Switzerland
        • Recruiting
        • University Hospital Berne
        • Contact:
      • Berne, Switzerland
      • Chur, Switzerland
        • Recruiting
        • Cantonal Hospital Graubünden
        • Contact:
      • Geneva, Switzerland
        • Recruiting
        • University Hospital Geneva
        • Contact:
      • Lausanne, Switzerland
        • Recruiting
        • University Hospital Lausanne
        • Contact:
      • Lucerne, Switzerland
        • Recruiting
        • Cantonal Hospital Lucerne
        • Contact:
      • Lugano, Switzerland
        • Recruiting
        • Regional Hospital Lugano
        • Contact:
      • Zürich, Switzerland
        • Recruiting
        • University Hospital Zurich
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

All in-hospital patients (consecutive) undergoing surgery in the operating room with anaesthesia involvement

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

- All in-hospital patients (consecutive or random sample) undergoing surgery from general surgery, vascular, surgery, orthopaedics/traumatology and urology in the operating room with anaesthesia involvement

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients undergoing one-day-surgery (with or without anaesthesia-involvement)
  • Procedures without anaesthesia-involvement (in- or out-patient)
  • ASA risk classification (ASA) VI patients (brain-death, organ-donor)
  • Follow-up procedure of a patient already included in the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
before and after implementation cohort

consecutive cohort of 900 surgical patients (baseline)

consecutive cohort of 900 surgical patients (after implementation with a multifaceted, tailored implementation strategy to improve adherence to the WHO SSC and routine recording of iAEs)

No intervention, observational only

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Intervention fidelity - component checklist completion
Time Frame: 2 months after the end of the implementation
Checklist completion is defined as completeness of all ticks on the sign-out checklist taking into consideration the minimum standard.
2 months after the end of the implementation

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Intervention fidelity - component quality of checklist performance
Time Frame: Up to four months after the implementation

Quality of the sign-out will be measured with the WHO behaviourally anchored rating scale (WHOBARS):

Quality will be measured in a random sample of 20-25%, assessed in those centres with well-established sign-out in the baseline period and in all centres in the after-implementation phase.

Up to four months after the implementation
Implementation fidelity - Quantitative and qualitative evaluation of critical implementation steps
Time Frame: Up to four months after the implementation
Quantitative and qualitative evaluation of critical implementation steps followed or not (and why not) by each site, according to the proposed/designed implementation plan (template)
Up to four months after the implementation
Intervention acceptability - extent of perception among stakeholders that the intervention is agreeable or satisfactory
Time Frame: Measured after the implementation
Acceptability is the extent of perception among stakeholders that the intervention is agreeable or satisfactory. It will be measured according to the Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM).
Measured after the implementation
Adaptation - extent to which sign-out and documentation of iAEs have been locally adapted
Time Frame: Checklist and process modifications classified according to FRAME.
Adaptation is the extent to which sign-out and documentation of iAEs have been locally adapted. It will be measured by comparing the local checklists with the minimum standard sign-out.
Checklist and process modifications classified according to FRAME.
Appropriateness - extent to which staff perceive the intervention as being a good fit, relevant and compatible with their setting
Time Frame: Measured after the implementation
Appropriateness is the extent to which staff perceive the intervention as being a good fit, relevant and compatible with their setting. It will be measured by the Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM).
Measured after the implementation
Feasibility - extent to which sign-out and documentation of iAEs can be successfully used or carried out within a given setting
Time Frame: Measured after the implementation
Feasibility is the extent to which sign-out and documentation of iAEs can be successfully used or carried out within a given setting. It will be measured by the Feasibility of Intervention Measure FIM.
Measured after the implementation
Sustainment
Time Frame: 12 months after the last patient out
Sustainment is measured by comparing (full) adherence (defined as completeness of all ticks on the sign-out checklist) 12 months after implementation
12 months after the last patient out

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Qualitative conclusions
Time Frame: Longitudinal data collection before, during and after the implementation
Qualitative conclusions about the effectiveness of the employed implementation strategy.
Longitudinal data collection before, during and after the implementation
Characterising themes
Time Frame: Longitudinal data collection before, during and after the implementation
Themes characterising the factors that influenced the observed implementation processes, based on the results from the contextual analysis.
Longitudinal data collection before, during and after the implementation
Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI®)
Time Frame: Difference in CCI® before and after the implementation at hospital discharge and at 90 days after surgery
CCI® (Comprehensive Complication Index) is the weighted sum of all pAEs according to Clavien-Dindo. It will be assessed at hospital discharge and at 90 days after surgery.
Difference in CCI® before and after the implementation at hospital discharge and at 90 days after surgery
Severe iAEs according to ClassIntra®
Time Frame: Difference in number of severe iAEs before and after the implementation
Severe iAEs according to ClassIntra® are defined as greater than or equal to grade III.
Difference in number of severe iAEs before and after the implementation
Total number of iAEs according to ClassIntra®
Time Frame: Difference in total number of iAEs before and after the implementation
Total number of iAEs according to ClassIntra® occurring in the baseline and the after implementation period.
Difference in total number of iAEs before and after the implementation
Severe pAEs according to Clavien-Dindo
Time Frame: Difference in number of severe iAEs before and after the implementation
Severe pAEs according to Clavien-Dindo are defined as greater than or equal to grade IIIa. They will be assessed at hospital discharge and at 90 days after surgery.
Difference in number of severe iAEs before and after the implementation
Total number of pAEs according to Clavien-Dindo
Time Frame: Difference in total number of pAEs before and after the implementation
Total number of pAEs according to Clavien-Dindo occurred in the baseline and the after implementation period. They will be assessed at hospital discharge and at 90 days after surgery.
Difference in total number of pAEs before and after the implementation
Number of resulting actions due to the routine recording and discussion of iAEs during the sign-out
Time Frame: Difference in number of resulting actions before and after the implementation
Resulting actions are e.g. preventive measures for anticipated pAEs.
Difference in number of resulting actions before and after the implementation
Length of hospital stay
Time Frame: Difference in length of hospital stay before and after the implementation
Length of hospital stay will be measured in days.
Difference in length of hospital stay before and after the implementation

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 17, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 15, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 17, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

April 18, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 10, 2025

Last Verified

February 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Perioperative Patient Safety

Clinical Trials on Observational study

Subscribe