e-VITA: European-Japanese Virtual Coach for Smart Ageing (WAVE II)

The study is a multicentre Proof-of-Concept. The general objective of the e-VITA project is to develop a personalized virtual coach capable of interacting with its elderly interlocutor. The experimentation will be carried out in 4 sites: Italy, France, Germany and Japan.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The general objective of the e-VITA project is to improve well-being for older adults and thereby promote active and healthy ageing, contribute to independent living, and reduce risks of social exclusion of older adults by making use a virtual coach by 240 healthy older adults recruited from Europe (France, Germany and Italy) and Japan. The study is a multicenter Proof-of-Concept study with a duration of the intervention of six months.

The multidisciplinary consortium collaborating in this project will develop an innovative ICT-based virtual coaching system to detect subtle changes in physical, cognitive, psychological and social domains of older adult's daily life. The e-VITA virtual coach will thus provide personalized recommendations and interventions, for sustainable wellbeing in a smart living environment at home.

The different components of the system are:

  • Coaches, consisting of social robots, that will interact with the users and are guided by apps;
  • Sensors (both wearable and domestic) to detect physiological parameters, physical activities, and behavior of the users; these sensors are: the Huawei smart band (wearable), the NeU device (wearable), and the DeltaDore system (domestic).
  • Smartphones (the chatbot to provide insights, suggestion, and stimulation about healthy nutrition and physical exercise; the social platform to encourage users to share their interests).

These components (coaches, sensors, chatbot and social platform) together with a main software named Use Cases Configurator (UCC) constitute the Virtual Coach.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

240

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Paris, France
      • Cologne, Germany
        • Diocesan Caritas Association for the Archdiocese of Cologne
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Johanna Möller
      • Ancona, Italy, 60127
        • IRCCS INRCA Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Roberta Bevilacqua
      • Miyagi, Japan
        • Tohoku University -Smart Ageing Research Center
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Toshimi Ogawa

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Able to stand and walk unaided;
  • No acute or untreated medical problems;
  • Montreal Cognitive Assessement test (MOCA) ≥ 22;
  • Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) < 9;
  • Short performance physical battery (SPPB) ≥ 7
  • Clinical Frailty Scale score between 2 and 4.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Use of active implant or not-implant medical devices;
  • Allergy to nichel;
  • A myocardial infarction or stroke within 6 months;
  • Painful arthritis, spinal stenosis, amputation, painful foot lesions or neuropathy limiting balance and mobility;
  • Uncontrolled hypertension;
  • Pacemaker or implantable cardioverter defibrillator;

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Control group
Participant in the control group will receive a booklet containing information and activities on well-being
Experimental: NAO robot group
The coaching device used is the softbank NAO 5 and NAO 6 humanoid interactive mobile robot. These robot platform allows multimodal natural language interaction and robot autonomous movement.
Experimental: Google Nest Hub (2e generation) group
The coaching device used is Google Nest Hub (2e generation). This is a connected speaker enriched with a 7-chip touch screen. It has a loudspeaker and 3 microphones, making interaction possible.
Experimental: Gatebox group
The coaching device used is the Gatebox, a hologram like device which the user can interact. There are internal sensors such as a camera and a microphone allow the user to converse with the projected character. It connects to the Internet via a wireless LAN. With infrared rays and Bluetooth, it can also be connected to household appliances and other devices.
Experimental: CelesTE robot group

The coaching device used is the CelesTE robot, a prayer companion designed for Christian Catholic users.The intended main function of CelesTE is to be a "guardian angel", especially thought for elderly people. It can be a prayer companion, and contains a vast number of teachings, including the whole Bible. Its AI is capable of keeping a short conversation, in which the user may ask and receive an answer about a sensitive topic (such as happiness, death, faith, etc.). It can also printout a selection of contents.

The coaching device CelesTE will be substituted by DarumaTO for the Japanese centers.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in the Quality of Life
Time Frame: baseline and 6 months later
The EQ-5D-5L scale consists of five dimensions: mobility, independence, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: no problems, mild problems, moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems. The participant is asked to indicate his/her health status by ticking the box corresponding to the most appropriate statement in each of the five dimensions. The numbers from the five dimensions can be combined into a 5-digit number that describes the health status of the participant.
baseline and 6 months later

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in usability
Time Frame: At 3 and 6 months from baseline
The System Usability Scale (SUS) is a reliable tool for measuring usability. It consists of a10 item questionnaire with five response options for respondents from 'Strongly agree' to 'Strongly disagree'.
At 3 and 6 months from baseline
Change in frailty status
Time Frame: baseline and 6 months later
The Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) divides the older participants into 9 classes based on the information provided by them and their relatives: between 1 and 3 the patient is non-frail, pre-frail if 4, he is frail from 5 to 9.
baseline and 6 months later
Change in nutritional capacity
Time Frame: baseline and 6 months later
The Short Food frequency questionnaires scale (FFQ) is used to estimate the frequency of daily food intake over a period of time. The FFQ asks for the frequency of certain food intake (once daily, once or twice a week, once or twice a month), and the approximate serving size. The questionnaire asks for information on the habitual intake of the food and is not to quantify the actual amount of nutrients ingested.
baseline and 6 months later
Change in affinity with technology
Time Frame: baseline and 6 months later
The Affinity for Technology Interaction (ATI) measures a person's interaction-related affinity with technology. It consists of a total of nine items and uses a six-point Likert scale from 1 = completely disagree to 6 = completely agree.
baseline and 6 months later
Change in cognitive status
Time Frame: baseline and 6 months later
Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) is a cognitive test validated as a highly sensitive tool for early detection of mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Scores on the MoCA range from zero to 30. A score of 26 and higher is considered normal.
baseline and 6 months later
Change in psychological mood
Time Frame: baseline and 6 months later
The Geriatric Depression scale 5-items version (GDS-5 items) questionnaire assesses the current condition of the patient's mood. Scores >1 are indicative for depression.
baseline and 6 months later
Change in performance status
Time Frame: baseline and 6 months later
Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) is a short battery of tests designed to assess the function of the lower limbs. This scale consists of 3 different sections: balance assessment, evaluation of walking on 4 linear meters, evaluation of the ability to perform, for 5 consecutive times, the sit to stand from a chair, without using the upper limbs. The total scale score therefore has a range from 0 to 12. A total score below 10 indicates frailty and a high risk of disability and falls.
baseline and 6 months later
Change in person's need for technology
Time Frame: baseline and 6 months later
The Assistive Technology Device Predisposition Assessment (ATDPA-5 - scales B and E) assesses the person's need for technology. It has two parts. A part on the individual with 9 items assessing functional capacities and 11 items on well-being. These first 20 items are to be filled in on a Likert scale of 5, ranging from 1: poor/not satisfied to 5: excellent/very satisfied. Finally, this last part also assesses personal and psychosocial characteristics. There is no threshold value for these last items. The second part deals with technological tools with 12 items highlighting their expectations in terms of benefits towards three technological tools. There is no threshold for this scale, but the scores range from 0 to 60 (sum of the statements).
baseline and 6 months later

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Study Director: Roberta Bevilacqua, IRCCS INRCA, Ancona, Italy

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 24, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 30, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 30, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 18, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 18, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

April 28, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 27, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 26, 2023

Last Verified

October 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • INRCA_005_2023

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Quality of Life

Clinical Trials on Virtual coach with NAO robot

3
Subscribe